• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/25

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

25 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
historical perspective of team leadership 20's-30's
-human relations movement
-collaborative efforts at work
historical perspective of team leadership 40's
-group dynamic
-social science theory
historical perspective of team leadership 50's
-T group
-Leader's role in T group
historical perspective of team leadership 60's-70's
-organizational development
-team leader effectiveness
historical perspective of team leadership 80's
-quality teams
-benchmarking
-continuous improvement
historical perspective of team leadership 90's
-global perspective
-flatter organizational structure
-strategies for competitive advantage
-group dynamics
-social science theory
-team based, technology enabled
historical perspective of team leadership Parker 1990
-the use of teams has led to :
a. greater productivity
b. more effective use of resources
c. better decisions and problem solving
d. better quality products and services
e. increased innovation and creativity
TL description: perspective
team research
-focus on team variables
-role of affective, behavioral and cognitive processes in team success
-team performance and viablility
a. role of mediation
b. trust, bonding, planning, adapting, structure, and learning
Issues
-difficult to understand the team process because of its complexity
-leader ineffectiveness is a major obstacle to overall team effectiveness
objectives
-understand role of leadership in teams
-ensure team success and avoid failure
leader's function
-complexity involved in performing these functions
-how performance of these complex functions relates to actual team performance
TL capacity
-shared or distributed leadership
-encompasses entire team
TL model
-provides leader or designated team member with a mental road map to help diagnose team problems and how to correct them
-mental model reflects
a. components of the problem
b. environmental and organizational contingencies
TL model
leadership behavior
-seen as team based problem solving
leader uses direction
-which problems need intervention
-make choices about which solutions are most appropriate
effective leaders have the ability to determine
-what interventions are needed
leadership decisions
-monitor or take action
-task or relational
-internal or external
internal task leadership actions
skills/actions leader can use to improve performance:
-goal focusing
-structuring for results
-facilitating decision making
-training team members in task skills
-maintaining standards of excellence
internal relational leadership actions
improve relationships
-coaching team members in interpersonal skills
-collaborating
-managing conflict and power issues
internal relational leadership actions
-build commitment and esprit de corps
-satisfying individual member needs
-modeling ethical and principled practices
external environmental leadership actions
-networking and forming alliances in environment
-advocating and representing team to environment
-negotiating upward to secure necessary resources, support, and recognition for team
-buffering team members from environmental distractions
-assessing environmental indicators of team's effectiveness
-sharing relevant environmental info with team
team effectiveness
-performance and development
team effectiveness
-clear, elevating goals
-results driven structure
-competent team members
-unified commitment
-collaborative climate
-standards of excellence
-how things were accomplished
-external support and recognition
-principled leadership
how TL works
1. leader engages in mediation process
2. determine exact intervention needed
3. determine action needed/ which level to intervene
4. decide to intervene at any or all 3 levels
strengths
-provides answers to what is an excellent team
-provides a cognitive guide
-recognizes changing role of leaders and followers
-can be used to select group leaders
criticisms
-not totally supported and tested
-may not be practical
-fails to provide much guidance
-more focus required on how to teach and provide skill development in areas of diagnosis and action taking
application
-useful in leader decision making
-can be used as team diagnostic tool