Laws1116 - Final Exam Cases - Acquisition Of Property

Front 1

Pye v Renshaw

Back 1

The High Court ruled that there is no constitutional guarantee for compensation.

Front 2

ICM v Commonwealth

Back 2

The High Court ruled that state rights to compensation can be nullified by legislation.

Front 3

Magennis v Cth

Back 3

The High Court ruled that the Commonwealth cannot grant financial assistance to states that involves acquisition of property through unjust means.

Front 4

Tasmanian Dam Case

Back 4

The High Court ruled that the legislation did not constitute acquisition.

Front 5

Georgiadis v Telecommunications Commission

Back 5

The High Court ruled that extinguishment of a right did not constitute acquisition.

Front 6

Health Ins. Comm'n v Peverill

Back 6

The High Court ruled that reduction in payable benefits did no constitute acquisition.

Front 7

Army Minister v Dalziel

Back 7

The High Court ruled that exclusive possession of land without title constituted property.

Front 8

Bank of New South Wales v Commonwealth

Back 8

The High Court ruled that company shares constituted property.

Front 9

Smith Koine v Secretary, Department of Community Services

Back 9

The High Court ruled that confidential information protected by equitable remedies constituted property.

Front 10

Georgiadis v Telecommunications Commission

Back 10

The High Court ruled that the right to sue constituted property.

Front 11

Health Insurance Commission v Peverill

Back 11

The High Court ruled that statutory rights to government payments constituted property.

Front 12

Murphyores v Commonwealth

Back 12

The High Court ruled that compensation need not be paid for diminished property value resulting from export restrictions.

Front 13

Trade Practices Commission v Tooth

Back 13

The High Court ruled that compensation need not be paid for diminished property value resulting from land zoning.

Front 14

British medical Association v Commonwealth

Back 14

The High Court ruled that compensation need not be paid for diminished property value resulting from price controls.

Front 15

Newcrest Mining v Cth

Back 15

The High Court ruled that the cancellation of a licence to use land for a purpose would amount to acquisition.

Front 16

Cth v Western Australia

Back 16

The High Court ruled that Commonwealth authorization for use of state land that inhibits use of that land does not constitute acquisition.

Front 17

British American Tobacco Australasia v Commonwealth

Back 17

The High Court ruled that restrictions on how a company may promote their goods using logos and phrases constitutes acquisition.