• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/59

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

59 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Explain the difference between the facts and the law in a lawsuit
Facts are what happened; law is what should be done because of the fact
What is judicial review?
The right of any court to declare any law or official governmental action INVALID because it violates a constitutional provision
Original Jurisdiction
Determines both the facts and law in the case
Appellate Jurisdiction
Courts that hear appeals only from lower courts and other agencies
4 Elements to determine constitutionality of time, place or manner restrictions or rules
1. Rules must be content neutral
2. Rules must not constitiue a complete ban on communication
3. Rules must be justified by a substantial state interest
4. Rules must be narrowly tailored
Learned Hand
"The language of the law must not be foreign to the ears of those who are to obey it."
Gitlow doctrine
Incorporation Doctrine
Zenger was not important legally because..
The jury had ignored the existing law, which remained in effect despite the decision
Common Law
an inductive system of law in which a legal rule is arrived at after a consideration of great many specific instances or cases
Written guarantee of freedom of expression was..
Regected by the 1787 Constitutional convention
Congress can abolish all courts save Supreme because..
The Constitution calls for only one court: the Supreme Court
Gitlow is important because
It applied protections in the Bill of Rights to state and local regulations
Writ of Certiorari
Agreeing to hear the appeal of a lower court ruling
Absolutist and access theory...
Have received the least support from members of the Supreme Court
Near vs Minnesota
Prior restraint was unconstitutional IN THIS CASE
Statutory law vs Common law
Statutory can deal with problems affecting society or a large group; common law focuses on problems relatinig to specific dispute among 2 people
Government agencies create rules that make up what kind of law?
Administrative Law
Historical significance of common law and equity law
Equity law began as a supplement to common law
United States sedition laws...
may have been given new life recently because of prosecutions and federal statutes that are the result of recent terrorist attacks in the United States
T/F Mayors and governors have the power to issue rules of law
True
T/F A law that is not specific enough may be declared unconstitutional
True
T/F A provision of the U.S. Constitution give federal courts the power of judicial review
False
T/F Judges today most commonly apply the preferred position balancing strategy to cases involving freedom of speech and press
True
T/F The Supreme Court ruling on power of school adminstators to censor the student press clearly applies to student newspapers at public colleges and universities
False
T/F Son of Sam laws involve prior restraint
True
Which of the following cannot sue for civil libel?
The estate of any dead person who has been libeled.
The members of a group may sue for libel on the basis of a defamatory story about the group if
the group is small enough that each member can be identified.
In evaluating the truth or falsity of an article, a court will consider
all of the items listed above.
Anti-SLAPP laws regulate
none of the above.
A person who is libel proof will have difficulty winning a libel suit because
his or her reputation was seriously damaged even before the publication of the libel.
The difference between libel per se and libel per quod is that the former is
clearly defamatory on its face.
Which of the following was not a reason the Supreme Court used as a rationale in the New York Times v Sullivan case?
A ruling for Sullivan would imperil the civil rights movement.
Some courts have used three criteria suggested by the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether a reporter or editor exhibited reckless disregard for the truth. Which of the following is not one of these three?
Was the story verified by two independent sources?
The First Amendment was first applied to libel law by the Supreme Court in
the 1790s.
Bootstrapping in libel law occurs when
the plaintiff pulls the reporters who prepared the story into court as well as the publication or broadcast outlet
Actual malice is best described as
ill will and intent to harm the plaintiff.
In determining whether a government employee is a public figure for the purposes of a libel suit, the court will consider
what the story is about, and if it was a breaking news story.
Which of the following is covered under the statute of limitations?
A libel suit must be filed within a specific period of time after the libel is published.
When considering whether a defamatory story qualifies for the defense of qualified privilege, courts consider
all of the above.
. In defending a lawsuit based on statements of opinion, a defendant may win the case
all of the above.
T/F The target of the typical SLAAP suit is always a major media company
False
T/F A libelous statement is something that injures an individual’s character but not his/her reputation
False
T/F A person must be specifically named or pictured to be identified for purposes of a libel suit.
True
T/F The burden of proving truth or falsity of the material generally falls on the plaintiff.
True
T/F The cost of defending against a libel suit is as much of a problem for the press as multi-million dollar judgments
True
T/F Attributing a statement to a third party will usually not shield a reporter from a libel suit.
False
T/F It is always the judge’s responsibility in a libel suit to decide whether the words are defamatory
False
T/F A libel suit cannot be based on an isolated phrase taken out of context.
False
T/F A person who was considered a public figure in connection with a public controversy remains a public figure with regard to stories published or broadcast about that controversy in the future, despite the passage of time
True
T/F Proof that the defendant failed to investigate a charge that later turns out to be false is sufficient to prove actual malice.
False
T/F The New York Times rule was generated by a lawsuit stemming from the Clinton-era Whitewater controversy
False
T/F A business regulated by the government is always regarded as a public figure
True
T/F The statute of limitations for libelous matter on the Internet begins the day the matter is first accessed by a user
False
T/F The statute of limitations for libelous matter is two years in Michigan
False
T/F A summary judgment occurs when a judge or jury makes a decision in a lawsuit after hearing only a summary of the plaintiff’s allegations and the defendant’s defense
Fasle
5 Elements for initial burden of proof in a libel action (5)
1. Libel was published
2. Words were concerning the plaintiff
3. Material was defamatory
4. Material was false
5. Defendant was at fault
Critera for limited purpose public figure (3)
1. Public controversy must exist before publication
2. Plaintiff must have voluntarily participated
3. Plaintiff must have tried to influence public opinion regarding the controversy
Actual Malice
Knowledge before publication that material was false, or reckless disregard of truth or falsity
Intentional infliction of emotional distress (3)
1. Must prove that it was extreme or outrageous
2. That it caused emotional distress
That emotional distress was severe
3. That it was intentional