Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
62 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is the most important law in the state and federal government?
|
Constitution
|
|
What are Case Laws?
|
- court decisions from appeals courts
- ex. common law, Tarasoff v UC Regents -called a case law b/c it is derived from a case and upholded by the court |
|
What are "codes of ethics?"
|
Not law
-written by private assoc -can be amended w/o consent or approval of an elected rep, judge, or govt employee -est. acceptable standards of conduct -can be adopted by state licensing boards |
|
Necessity of License
|
In CA, one needs a license in order to provide psychotherapy/counseling services for money
|
|
B&P Code 2903 - Psychologist Scope of Practice
|
any psychological service to individuals, gps, orgs, or the public, including but not restricted to: diagnosis, prevention, treatment, & amelioration of psychological problems & emotional & mental disorders of individuals and groups
|
|
What does IRAC stand for?
|
Issue
Rule & exception Application Conclusion |
|
3 parts of Competence
|
Technical knowledge
Social Skills Emotional Well being |
|
Why must psychologists ensure that they are practicing legally & ethically?
|
to protect the welfare of the client
|
|
Statutes
|
- written by legislatures (fed & state laws) these reflect the minimum standards that society will tolerate
-sometimes termed "citations" in CA -ex: Welfare & Institutions Code, Business & Professions Code |
|
Regulations
|
- written by agencies under the authority of a legislature
- ex: CA Code of Regulations |
|
Ethical Standards
|
-reflect the IDEAL standards set forth by a profession
ex: APA standards |
|
Major CA codes affecting Psychologists
|
- considered binding to APA members & disciplinary actions can come from violations
-Business & Professions Code -Civil Code (marriage; minors) -Evidence Code (Psy-Patient privilege) -Welfare & Institutions Code (5150; elder abuse) -Penal Code (child abuse recording) -Family Code (parental custody) |
|
What is the difference between STANDARDS & GUIDELINES?
|
Standards - mandatory & enforced (APA Ethical Code)
Guidelines - newer; aspirational & edu about specific professional bx or conduct |
|
How is the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists & Code of Conduct organized?
|
1. Intro & Applicability (what's enforceable)
2. Preamble (relevance) 3. General Principles (aspirational; not enforceable) 4. Ethical Standards (mandatory) |
|
Principle A: Beneficence & Nonmaleficence
|
Psychs seek to safeguard the welfare & rights of clients, etc
-alert to personal factors that may pose challenges to client's treatment |
|
Principle B: Fidelity & Responsibility
|
-Psychs est trust
-are aware of responsibilities -uphold pro standards of conduct -clarify their role & refer out/consult |
|
Principle C: Integrity
|
In APA Principles of Psychs & Codes of Conduct
-promote accuracy, honesty, truthfulness; don't cheat, steal, defraud, or misrepresent |
|
Principle D: Justice
|
-entitle all ppl access to/benefit from quality serves of psychs
-take precautions to avoid biases/crossing boundaries |
|
Principle E: Respect for Ppl's Rights & Dignity
|
-respect rights of indis to privacy, confidentiality, & self determination
-respect cultural, indiv, & role differences |
|
What do the ethical standards in Ethical Principles of Psychs & Code of Conduct address?
|
1. Resolving ethical issues
2. Competence 3. Human Relations (avoid harm, informed consent, multiple relationships) 4. Privacy & Confidentiality 5. Ads & other Public Statements 6. Record Keeping & Fees 7. Edu & Training 8. Research & Pub 9. Assessment 10. Therapy |
|
What are the ethical codes regarding COMPETENCE?
|
2.01 Boundaries of Competence
2.02 Providing services in Emergencies 2.03 Maintaining Competence 2.04 Bases for Scientific & Prof Judgments 2.05 Delegation of work to others 2.06 Personal Problems & Conflicts |
|
What are the ethical codes regarding HUMAN RELATIONS?
|
3.01 Unfair Discrimination
3.02 & 3.03 Sexual; Other Harassment 3.04 Avoiding Harm 3.05 Multiple Relationships (avoid, resolve, clarify confidentiality) 3.06 Conflict of Interest 3.07 3rd Party Requests for Services 3.08 Exploitative Relationships 3.09 Cooperation w/other Pros 3.10 Informed Consent 3.11 Psych Services Delivered to/thru Orgs 3.12 Interruption of Psych Services |
|
APA Ethics Committee -
Complaint Process |
Submitted by members & non members, evaluation to determine if it warrants investigation
|
|
Possible Recommendations/Outcomes of the complaint process done by APA Ethics Committee
|
-Dismissal, censure/reprimand of psych
- Expulsion from APA - Offer opp to resign w/stipulations -If expelled, CA & BoP can take away your license |
|
CA Board of Psychology (BoP)
|
-is in charge of licensing & regulation of psychologists
-can investigate anonymous ethical complaints & impose sanctions |
|
Virtue Ethics
|
-rely on character traits of the provider
-involve ideals to which the profession aspires -involve the right mixture of motives, knowledge, & character |
|
Principle Based Ethics
|
Set of principle-based obligations that hold unless over-ridden by a superior obligation
-supererogatory obligations |
|
Kitchener Model of an approach to ethical decision making
|
There are levels of ethical decision-making
1. Intuitive Level (ex. child abuse) 2. Critical Evaluative Level --ethical rules (APA Ethics Code, standards) --ethical principles -----Autonomy, non-malificence, beneficence, fidelity, justice, veracity --ethical theory -----Univeralizability (look at lgr impact), Balancing Principle (least amount of harm) |
|
Keith- Spiegel & Koocher approach to ethical decision making
|
ID the Problem --> See Ethics Code
Consider sources of what you could do Find colleague --> See JD to consult Eval rights/respons of all affected parties generate alt decisions --> look at consequences of each make decision --> implement |
|
Problem Solving approaches to Ethical Decision Making
|
-consistent, methodical
- consider rights, responsibilities, vulnerabilities -consider alternative decisions Ex. Keith-Spiegel & Koocher, Canadian PA |
|
Which PRINCIPLES and STANDARDS in the APA Ethics Code address MULTICULTURAL CONCERNS?
|
Principles -
D: Justice E: Respect for Rights & Dignity Standards- Competence, Human Relations, Therapy |
|
Business & Practice Code 2903 [Psychologist Scope of Practice]
|
-any psychological service offered to individuals, gps, orgs, or public, including diagnosis, prevention, treatment, & amelioration of psych and emotional problems and mental disorders to gps and individuals
|
|
3 parts to COMPETENCE
|
1. Technical knowledge
2. Social Skills 3. Emotional well-being (emotional competence, prudence) |
|
What does IRAC stand for? What is it?
|
-a template used in clinical situations
ISSUE- ex. confidentiality, RULE & exception - every issue has a rule APPLICATION - what does this look like? CONCLUSION - resulting decision |
|
Boundaries
|
- rules of the prof relationship btwn a psych-client
-set limits, provide structure, prevent harm to client -support idea that primary purpose of therapy is to promote the welfare of the client |
|
Boundary Crossing
|
-when a prof deviates from a strictly prof role (ex. helpful therapist self-disclosure)
-may or may not also be a boundary violation (ex. having sex w/a patient) |
|
Boundary Violation
|
-a boundary crossing that creates a reasonable risk of harming/exploiting a patient
-represent 1/2 of the disciplinary actions of APA Ethics Committee |
|
Standard 3.05 Multiple Relationships
|
when a psych is in a prof role w/a person and
1. simultaneously is in another relationship w/the person 2. is simultaneously in a relationship w/a closely assoc/related person 3. promises to enter into another relationship in future w/the person or close relation/relative |
|
How does the APA define a concurrent multiple relationship?
|
-when psychs have social/business relationships w/patients at the same time as they have prof relationships
|
|
How does the APA define a Consecutive Multiple Relationship?
|
-as when psychs have a social/business relationship w/patient either before/after professional relationship
|
|
Positive Limit Setting
|
responding to a client's request that pushes boundaries, while simultaneously reframing the response in a way that meets a legitimate underlying need (ex. reject a social invitation but recognize client's need to dvlp other social relationships)
|
|
Standard 10.08a &b Sexual Intimacies w/Former Therapy Clients/Patients
|
a. Psychs can't engage in sexual intimacies w/former clients/patients for at least 2 yrs after end of therapy; after 2 yrs only in highly unusual circumstances
b.if psychs do have sexual relations w/ former patients they must not involve exploitation, and have to show 1. the amount of time since therapy ended 2. nature, duration, & intensity of therapy 3. circumstances of termination 4. client's/patient's personal history/ (5) current mental status 6. likelihood of adverse impact on client/patient 7. any statements/actions by therapist during therapy suggesting/inviting chance of posttermination sex/romantic relationship |
|
What was the legal case that established informed consent?
|
Medical : Canterbury v Spence
Psychology - Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge |
|
Tarasoff, Civil Code 43.92, and Ethics Code 4.05 all cover what?
|
duty to protect and disclosure of info in specific cases
|
|
What are the components of informed consent?
|
Competency of the client
Disclosure of material information Comprehension of Info Voluntary consent |
|
When is informed consent not necessary?
|
-situations that are life-threatening to the client
-when client is deemed incompetent to consent to treatment - the client's prerogative -therapeutic privilege |
|
What if an individual is legally incapable of giving informed consent?
|
-provide an appropriate explanation
-seek individual's assent - consider individual's prefs/ best interests - obtain approp permission from legally authorized person, if req by law |
|
What does informed consent look like in therapy without established techniques & procedures?
|
-an explanation of the dvlping nature of the treatment
-potential risks -alternative treatments - voluntary nature of participation |
|
What are the 4 reporting options for therapist sexual misconduct?
|
-Administrative action (filing w/ licensing board)
-Criminal Action (filing w/local law enforcement) -Civil Action (lawsuit to seek compensation) - Professional Association action (filing w/ prof assoc's ethics committee; doesn't keep therapist from practicing) |
|
What are the exceptions to confidentiality that must be included prior to getting a client's informed consent?
|
1. danger to self
2. danger to others 3. child abuse 4. elder abuse 5. dependent adult abuse |
|
When can a clinician withhold information from a client regarding their diagnosis?
|
When the potential impact is very severe (ex. you can w/hold diagnosis from someone with paranoid schizophrenia if you know it would be detrimental)
|
|
Which APA Ethics Code Standards have to do with informed consent?
|
Standard 3.1 - age appropriate language
Standard 10.01b - therapy w/o est'd techniques & procedures Telemedicine B&P - redo informed consent specifically in regard to each electronic transaction |
|
According to Civil Code 43.93, what must you tell any client who reports having been sexually exploited by another therapist?
|
- information regarding document titled "professional therapy never includes sex"
|
|
What steps do most individuals take when filing a complaint against a therapist who sexually exploited them during therapy?
|
1. Professional (to est. it as unethical)
2. Administrative (to have license revoked) 3. Criminal or civil |
|
What is an Ethical Dilemma
|
Kitchener; situations in which there is no "right" decision, only a decision that is thoughtfully made & perhaps "more right" than the alternatives
|
|
Who proposed the ethical decision making model?
|
Kitchener
|
|
What did Tarasoff establish?
|
"duty to warn"; informed consent
|
|
What is the CPA's Problem Solving approach to ethical decision making?
|
1.Who might be impacted by possible solutions?
2. For each effected part, list reason for consideration, why, & the rights & responsibilities involved 3. Which action would you choose & why? 4. What alternatives are there? Why not pick them? 5. If something changed that might influ your decision, what would the change need to be? Why? 6. Any further thoughts/comments? 7. Assume responsibility for consec of action taken |
|
What are Kitchener's 5 moral principals that are basis for ethical guidelines
|
1. Autonomy
2. Beneficience 3. Justice 4. Nonmaleficence 5. Fidelity |
|
Feminist ethical decision making model
|
1. Recognize problem
2. Define problem 3. Develop solutions 4. Choose a solution 5. Review the process 6. Implement & evaluate decision 7. Continue reflection |
|
Kitchener's Model of ethical decision making - what are the steps?
|
1. Intuitive - look at facts & use ordinary moral sense (prereflective)
(critical evaluative level) 2. Look at ethical rules/ codes 3. ID ethical principle it impacts 4. Ethical theory - which consequence is the most in balance? |
|
What are the 4 prerequisites for establishing malpractice claims?
|
1. Duty (of care)
2. Deviation (breach of that duty) 3. Damages 4. Direct causation (deviation caused damages) |