Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
29 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
expectation interest
|
interest in having the benefit of the bargain by being put in a position as good as the one they would have been in had the contract been performed
|
|
reliance interest
|
interest in being reimbursed for loss caused by reliance on the contract by being put in a position as good as the one they would have been in had the contract not been made
|
|
restitution interest
|
interest in having restored to them any benefit that they had conferred on the other party
|
|
compensatory damages
|
contract damages aimed at protecting injured parties expectation interest; equals loss of value minus loss avoided by injured party plus incidental damages plus consequential damages
|
|
loss of value
|
value of promised performance minus value of actual performance
|
|
cost avoided
|
loss or costs the injured party avoids by not having to perform
|
|
incidental damages
|
damages arising directly out of a breach of contract (ex: costs incurred to acquire the nondelivered performance from some other source)
|
|
consequential damages
|
damages not arising directly out of a breach but arising as a foreseeable result of the breach (includes lost profits and injury to person or property)
|
|
reliance damages
|
contract damages that place injured party in as good a position as she would have been had the contract not been made (satisfies reliance interest)
|
|
nominal damages
|
a small sum awarded where a contract has been breached but the loss is negligible or unproved (may include court costs)
|
|
damages for misrepresntation
|
most states will give benefit-of-bargain for fraud and out-of-pocket for nonfraudulent misrepresentation (a few will give out-of-pocket for both)
|
|
out-of-pocket damages
|
difference between value given and value received
|
|
benefit-of-the-bargain damages
|
difference between the value of the fraudulent party's performance as represented and the value the defrauded party received
|
|
punitive damages
|
not recoverable for breach of contract (unless accompanied by a tort)
|
|
liquidated damages
|
reasonable damages agreed to in advance by the parties to a contract (enforced if it amounts to a reasonable forecast of loss that results)
|
|
foreseeability of damages
|
potential loss that party now in default had reason to know of when contract was made
|
|
certainty of damages
|
damages are not recoverable beyond an amount that can be established with reasonable certainty
|
|
mitigation of damages
|
injured party may not recover damages for loss he could have avoided by reasonable effort
|
|
remedies in equity
|
only available when there is no adequate remedy at law
|
|
specific performance
|
court decree ordering breaching party to render promised performance (always granted for breach of contract for sale of real property)
|
|
injunction
|
court order prohibiting a party from doing a specific act
|
|
reformation
|
court order correcting a written contract to conform with the intent of the contracting parties
|
|
restitution
|
restoration of the injured party to the position she was in before contract was made (satisfies restitution interest)
|
|
party injured by breach
|
if the other party totally breaches the contract by nonperformance or repudiation (restitution available)
|
|
party in default
|
one party partially performs, then breaches party in default is entitled to restitution; for any benefit conferred in excess of the loss caused by the breach
|
|
statute of frauds
|
where a contract is unenforceable because the statute of frauds, a party may recover the benefits conferred on the other party in reliance on the contract
|
|
voidable contracts
|
a party who had avoided a contract is entitled to restitution for any benefit conferred on the other party
|
|
election of remedies
|
if remedies are inconsistent, a party injured by a breach of contract may seek more than one remedy
|
|
loss of power of avoidance
|
a party with the power to avoid a contract may lose that power by affirming the contract, delaying unreasonably in exercising the power of avoidance, or being subordinated to the intervening rights of third parties
|