• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Factual Causation

‘But for’ the defendants actions would the V have faced the same result?

Factual causation CASE

R v Pagett

Legal Causation

Were the Ds actions more than a minimal cause of death

Legal causation CASE

R v Kimsey

Intervening acts

Those which break the chain of causation

Unreasonable actions of V

Vs actions were unforeseeable by the D. - unreasonable

Unreasonable actions of V

Vs actions were unforeseeable by the D. - unreasonable

Unreasonable actions of V- CASE

R v Roberts

Unreasonable actions of a 3rd party

3rd party to crime act in unforeseeable manner to the D

Unreasonable actions of a 3rd party

3rd party to crime act in unforeseeable manner to the D

Unreasonable actions of 3rd party- CASE

Rafferty

Unreasonable actions of a 3rd party

3rd party to crime act in unforeseeable manner to the D

Unreasonable actions of 3rd party- CASE

Rafferty

Palpably wrong medical treatment

Medical treatment fell so far below the standards of care there was a risk of death

Unreasonable actions of a 3rd party

3rd party to crime act in unforeseeable manner to the D

Unreasonable actions of 3rd party- CASE

Rafferty

Palpably wrong medical treatment

Medical treatment fell so far below the standards of care there was a risk of death

Palpably wrong medical treatment- CASE

C