Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
10 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Carroll Doctrine
|
Allowing warrantless searches of automobiles
|
|
|
New York v. Belton
|
No limits on the scope of a search of a vehicle's passenger compartment
|
|
|
California v. Hodari
|
about the teen boys running from the cops and throwing crack away before caught by the officer
|
|
|
Chimel v. California
|
Limitation on scope (arrestee might grab)
|
|
|
Escobedo v. Illinois
|
Suspects have a right to a councel during police interrogations
|
|
|
Indianapolic v. Edmond
|
The Supreme Cout ruling that police checkpoints aimed at discovering drugs were in violation of the 4th amendment
|
|
|
Minnesota v. Dickerson
|
"Plain Feel" Doctrine
|
|
|
Mapp v. Ohio
|
Evidence obtained in violation of the 4th amendment must be excluded = exclusionay rule - Fruit of Posion Tree Doctrine
|
|
|
Terry v. Ohio
|
Must have reasonable grounds for searching a citizen
|
|
|
United States v. Ross
|
May search an entire vehicle including containers if there is probable cause
|
