Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
7 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Berstein v Skyviews |
Beyond a certain height the landowner would have no better right |
|
|
Anchor Brewhouse v Berkley House |
Overswinging cranes are capable of trespass |
|
|
Two areas to consider when considering if it is a chattel or fixture |
Degree of Annexation Purpose of Annexation |
|
|
Elitestone v Morris |
Degree of annexation: Bungalow was on the land and needed to be damaged by removing it from the free standing pillars. The harder to remove the more likely for it to be a fixture |
|
|
Holland v Hodgson |
Purpose of looms was to improve the value of the land |
|
|
Leigh v Taylor |
The tapestry were for the mere enjoyment of the land and even if fixed were not meant to add value. |
|
|
Peel land & Property v Sheerness Steel |
Leasehold tenants can remove fixtures at the end of the lease or within reasonable period |
