• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Pye v Graham

Requirements for adverse possession


•physical/factual possession of the land


•possession must be adverse


• intention to possess the land to exclusion of others


Intention to possess


• remains even if claimant would have accepted permission


• previous permission - remaining after it ends may be sufficient

Powell v McFarlane

Intention to possess - put to his own use


Physical possession - using as landowner might

Buckinghamshire CC v Morgan

Intention to possess


•still present if used for same purpose as landowner was going to use it for


• actions of adverse possessor may give indication

Blackburn

Awareness that land belongs to another is not fatal, acknowledgement is

Michington

Fence


• keep out world or prevent dog’s escape

Best v Chief Land Registrar

Criminal offenses


• not themselves a bar to adverse possession claim

Ofulue v Bossert

Acknowledgement of title before expiry of limitations period


• court pleadings acceptable


•written document operated at time - not continuous

Smith v Waterman

Limitations period does not stop merely by paper owners going on land

Colchester v Smith

Written acknowledgement of paper owner’s title given after period of limitations has ended can be enough to prevent reliance on adverse possession

Asher v Whitlock

Adverse possessor waiting for completion of limitation period may transfer rights they have by will or inter vivos

Baxter v Mannion

LRA 2002


10 years adverse possession has occurred and is occurring


• paper owner may recover land if false

IAM group v chowdrey

Boundary exception


•belief that land belonged to him - reasonable


• has to be his belief, not jis solicitors


• being told that his land was not his did not make belief unreasonable

Purbrick v Hackney LBC

Factual possession - enough is more than enough

Mitchell v Watkinson

Later admission of title is also valid, possess in meantime

Clowes v Walter

Belief that land is currently held with permission is fatal