• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/4

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

4 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Importance of distinction
Is the most important distinction between between legal and eqt. Es

Both are proprietary; capable of running with the land; Q is whether they actually do
Effect on purchasers

1) Legal Es
s.29 LRA 2002 and Sch. 3 para. 3: implied legal Es will be OIs if any one of four conditions is met:

i) Is an E within the Commons Registration Act

ii) Is obvious on a reasonably careful inspection

iii) Is known about by the P

iv) Was used within 12 months imm. prior to sale

--> If ANY, the legal E will override; v.v. likely
Effect on purchasers

2) Equitable Es
The eqt. E will have had to be added as a Notice to the LR to bind a purchaser; unlikely

It isn't an OI because:
- It isn't legal
- The E owner isn't in actual occupation; they are in AO of their own, dominant tenement, not of the servient tenement - 'Chaudhary v Yavuz'
Effect on non-purchasers
s.28 LRA 2002: are bound by ALL existing rights