• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/3

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

3 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Legal and equitable easements
s.1 LPA 1925: E can be leg./eqt. depending on the instrument of creation:

LEGAL: deed + registration
Failure to register --> eqt. E (s.27(1) LRA 2002)

EQT.: enforceable written instrument (not oral):
s.2 LPA 1989: the contract must be:
i) In writing
ii) Incorporating all the terms
iii) Signed by both parties

-- 'Walsh v Lonsdale'

Usually have an eqt. E because:
- Failed legal formality requirements
- From PE - 'Ives v High'
a) Express grant
i) Already separate ownership: e.g. A grants B (neighbour) ROW for a fee/for free
Relatively uncommon
-- 'CP Holdings v Dugdale'

ii) A sells/leases part of his land: the E will be expressed in the conveyance
V. common
-- 'Hillman v Rogers': E to cross road at a defined point
b) Express reservation
A's reservation must be clearly and unequivocally expressed in the deed (leg.) or enf. written instrument (eqt.)