• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/52

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

52 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Rational Choice Theory
A theory that suggests a juvenile will engage in criminal acts after carefully weighing the benefits of gain against the cost of possible punishment
Trait Theory
Another theory that explains especially violent, criminal acts as not being done rationally but without control, and may be caused by physical or psychological traits
When does the decision to forego a delinquent act occur?
When the belief is that the benefits are no longer worth it or that the chances of finishing the crime is less than the chance of being caught
Utilitarians
Hold onto the belief that before a person decides on a course of behavior for the future, but only after weighing the benefits and consequences
Does an adolescent having a job increase or decrease delinquency? Why? Or why not?
activity rather than slow it. Teens seeking the employment may be looking for cash to spend on drugs or alcohol. The non existent parental supervision enhances the problem when the jobsite makes an excellent place for like minded peers’ seeking trouble to fraternize with one another. On the other hand, a job can be a positive experience if it includes support toward academic achievement.
Classical criminology is known as
Choice theory
Drug gang members make (more/less/the same) money as legitimate job holders?
Only slightly more at around six to eleven an hour
The focus of choice theory
is reactive behavior not instinctive behavior
Routine activities theory
The combination of three variables working at the same time: Suitable targets (CD player in unlocked car), absence of capable guardians (owner of car or security guard), the presence of motivated offenders (street wandering teen)
When does the decision to commit a delinquent act occur, according to choice theory?
After weighing the benefits and consequences
Who/what are capable guardians?
Neighbors, police officers, parents, car owners, business owners
“Awareness space”
Areas that are considered familiar to kids and make for comfort in the knowledge of escape routes, which will ultimately give opportunity to commit crimes
Recidivate
When first time offenders commit another crime
General deterrence
Policies that are created with the idea in mind that delinquents will refrain or choose not to commit a criminal act based on the fear of punishment, such as harsh penalties. (Severe, certain, and swift = Greater deterrent)
Why does punishment sometimes contribute to delinquency?
Juveniles that have been taken out of positive support systems by being placed in a facility for punishment and their stay with the facility draw them closer to their deviant peers. Just as important, the stigma placed on a person who is incarcerated makes employment much harder to gain so legitimate opportunities are lessoned
Why might deterrence threats not work for teens in bad neighborhoods?
They are surrounded by people that are consistently arrested and may not understand that being arrested is wrong. There’s no gamble in loosing anything if the threat of being arrested presents itself, since their place in society is already jeopardized and they tend not to worry about what the future holds anyway. They also live among many criminals and have watched them get away with many crimes
Situational crime prevention strategies
In contrast of focusing on the punishing of the individual, these are policies created to convince any possible offender that the risks would more than likely out weigh any opportunities and are aimed at reducing opportunities for would be offenders like: Increasing the effort to commit a crime, Increasing the risks, reducing the rewards, and increasing the shame of committing the crime
Co-offending
The process of juveniles committing criminal acts in groups, making peer pressure impede the deterrent effect of the law
Target hardening
Taking action toward increasing the effort to commit a crime in a practical manner like using bullet proof glass, breath analyzer that will automatically lock a person’s car, enforcing security, and using a form of photo I.D. in order to use a credit card
Specific deterrence
Focuses on the individual by punishing them severely in order to convince them not to repeat the offense
Are crackdowns effective?
Crackdowns are initially effective due to the shock effect. The effectiveness is short lived when the shock wears or worse yet the criminal activity relocates into an area less monitored by police
What crimes is choice theory weak on explaining?
Activity that is regarded as irrational, for example a crime such as vandalism or arson
Susceptibility rationale
This is an attempt to explain a link between learning disabilities and delinquencies. This view claims the link was caused by side effects of learning disabilities like impulse control and acceptable social norms
Atavism
A theory developed by Cesare Lombroso that claims delinquents can be identified by a particular set of physical characteristics. The traits he describes seem to be primitive, as in a stage of human evolution similar to our ancestors. A few of these traits are large jaws, strong canines, flat looking noses, and occasionally double rows of teeth. Also noted were arms occasionally exceeding the height of the person, which is characteristic of apes
School failure rationale
This view claims that the link between learning disabilities and delinquency draws from the frustration of poor school performance, which causes a negative self image, ultimately brings on a behavior of acting-out
Sociobiology
A science that studies the idea that behavior changes by adapting to the environment from which it evolved
Sensation seekers
The type of kids that are looking for a higher degree of environmental stimulation, seeking out stimulating activities similar to aggressive behavior
Can diet effect learning?
There have been a number of experiments done with data collected claiming that groups of kids were split in two and one group was given a placebo while the other a diet enriched with vitamins and minerals. The group with the improved diet showed a significant academic improvement while the other group was not as much improved
Heart rate and delinquency
The concept that kids with lower heart rates would commit criminal acts because their seeking the “rush” in order to bring arousal to normal levels
Can diet effect behavior?
Studies have been done within the confines of correctional facilities based on diet modifications. Some inmates were given an enriched diet with vitamins and minerals while others were not. The data showed that violent anti-social behavior was reduced on average by 48% with the diet modification including the vitamins and minerals
ADHD more common in boys or girls
Effect five to seven times more males than females
Is bullying inherited?
This behavior is brought on by a cycle that never ends. Bullies have kids that bully and they also bring up kids who bully
Role of reinforcement
The reinforcement of a positive or negative reaction toward a particular act determines whether the behavior is continued and/or learned
Findings in twin studies
Twins often have similarities whether they are raised together or apart, leaving us to believe that their behavior is caused from genes and not environment
Social learning theory
The concept that behavior is determined by social experiences along with values and expectations. Kids model their own behavior by watching how others react toward a particular behavior. They usually observe adults (mostly their parents) on television and movies. They model observed behavior
Findings in adoption studies
Many adoptee children behave and hold onto traits of intelligence similar to that of their biological parents. Regardless of the environment that the people who raise them provide for them
Children more likely influenced by what parents
do not say
Id – The pleasure seeking part of a person’s personality
Ego – This part of a person’s personality is a development through living and undergoing the realities of the world and helps the Id part of a personality to control it’s unrestrained desire for instant pleasure
Superego – The development of the conscience and moral degrees based on interactions with parents and other people
Id – The pleasure seeking part of a person’s personality
Ego – This part of a person’s personality is a development through living and undergoing the realities of the world and helps the Id part of a personality to control it’s unrestrained desire for instant pleasure
Superego – The development of the conscience and moral degrees based on interactions with parents and other people
How would Kohlberg explain delinquency?
Because Kohlberg believes moral development changes during stages throughout one’s life, delinquents are classified within whatever stage they obviously stopped their growth of moral development
Behaviorism and delinquency
Behaviorism is a theory based on observations and responses that create learning situations. The interpretation is that people learn to behave by observing how others respond to their behavior. If the response is positive then they repeat the behavior and the behavior is eventually learned
Information processing and delinquency
Information processing explains behavior through perception and data analysis. Before someone makes a decision there is input of information and experience a sequence of thought processes. A delinquent juvenile may have cognitive issues causing the delinquent to process the information incorrectly, resulting in an output of bad decisions.
Role of “scripts”
They are learned during early childhood and is how a child learns how to interpret events, expectations of them, and what the reaction should be, and what the outcome of the interactions should be
Nature and nurture arguments
Nature theory is based on the idea that persons have a predisposition toward delinquency. The nurture theory is based on the idea that intelligence is partly biological but mostly sociological. It also argues that intelligence is not inherited and parents with low IQs don’t necessarily produce offspring with low IQs
Personality traits of delinquents
Assertive, defiant, impulsive, narcissistic, superstitious, destructive, sadistic, unconcerned with others feelings, ambivalent, unappreciative, untrusting, mentally slow, resentful, aggressive
Hirschi and Hindelang’s findings
The findings of their study ultimately concluded that IQ, for predicting delinquency, is above race and social class
Antisocial personality disorder
Suffer from a multitude of negative personality traits and as a youth suffer somewhat from guilt and anxiety. Practice violating the rights of others and are incapable of forming honest and true relationships with other people. They’re often thrill seekers and have destructive streaks in their personalities. They have severe disability emphasizing with other’s feelings
IQ’s indirect influence
School failure is supported by low IQ and being uneducated is linked with delinquency
Role of IQ in delinquency
There is a general belief that delinquents have a lower IQ and are more likely to act criminally than juveniles with higher IQs.
IQ’s direct influence
Low IQ inhibits ones ability to weigh the consequences of an offence and lack feeling for their victims. Lower IQ individuals tend to misinterpret events, take risks, and become involved in harmful behavior
Nature and nurture arguments
Nature theory is based on the idea that persons have a predisposition toward delinquency. The nurture theory is based on the idea that intelligence is partly biological but mostly sociological. It also argues that intelligence is not inherited and parents with low IQs don’t necessarily produce offspring with low IQs
McCord’s findings on Cambridge-Somerville Youth Study
Those adolescents that were treated clinically were more likely to become involved with criminal violations than those who were left untreated (the control group)
Why didn’t it work (the youth study)
The clinical treatment quite possibly left the juveniles feeling stigmatized, labeling themselves as “different” or instigators of trouble, which ultimately hindered the efforts of clinical treatment