• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Red Lion Broadcasting v. FCC (1969)
red lion provide free airtime to person who doesnt want to

rules in favor of FCC

Section 315-equal opportunity rule legally qualified candidate

section 312
The Fairness Doctrine
applies to broadcasting
balanced programing required
personal attack rule
The Fairness Doctrine
The Balanced Programming Requirement (a.k.a., The Fairness Doctrine) –
repealed in 1987

Trigger: Controversial issue

Reasonable opportunity offered free to spokesperson for other side
NOT applied to entertainment or advertising => Banzhaf v. FCC
The Personal Attack Rule
repealed in 2000

Trigger: Attack on person
summary of broadcast provided and reasonable opportunity offered
free to person attacked
Access for Political Candidates
Section 312(a)(7) — candidates for federal office must have “reasonable
access”

Section 315 — candidates for office
Equal Opportunity Rule
Trigger: Candidate’s appearance paid, if other candidates paid
NOT “Equal Time” Rule
Miami Herald v. Tornillo (1974)
Print case

If newspaper takes opposition it must provide space for opponent. Herold doesnt want to give space, Tornilla looses
Florida’s Right To Reply Statute
Ocala Star Banner v. Damron (1971)
Who’ll take care of the Damrons of the
world?

Although a desirable goal, “press responsibility is not mandated by the
Constitution and like many other virtues it cannot be legislated.”
. Why are the broadcast media treated differently than the print media?

wrote false information about someone, got sued for libel
FCC v. Midwest Video (1979)
Cable Television

FCC cannot make cable television a common carrier.

ways to beat an administrative agency

Procedural grounds — Did it violate its own internal rule-making
procedures?

Overbreadth — Did it overstep the bounds of its authority?

FCC: have to by fed law to create public access channels
-req is unconstitutional (LA vs preffered)

Midwest video wins-gov cant require public access channels