• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/32

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

32 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Idiographic approach

Studying behaviour of individual cases

Nomothetic approach

Studying behaviour through general laws that apply to everyone

Three general law types of nomothetic

Classification, establishing principles & establishing dimensions

Idiographic qualitative or quantitative?

Qualitative

Nomothetic qualitative or quantitative?

Quantitative

Which is better nomothetic or idiographic

Both used together sheds light on different areas - eg. Bowlby's law of separation & Koluchuva twins

Nomothetic evaluation

+ Scientific methodology


+ Generalisable


- narrow & restricted view of the world


- understanding often superficial

Idiographic evaluation

+ generalised laws may not apply to individual


+ Can uncover causes for behaviour unfound


+ Holistic understanding


- methods are subjective and hard to replicate


- ungeneralisable

What must researchers consider when researching socially sensitive areas

Implications (what is it giving scientific credence?)


Uses/public policy (how will the government use it?)


Validity (is it wholly valid or subjective?)

Holism

Parts of any whole cannot exist or be understood except in relation to the whole

Reductionism

All complex systems can be understood in terms of their components

Holism approach

Humanistic approach

Reductionism approaches

Biological & behaviourist approach

Biological reductionism

All behaviour is at some level biological

Environmental reductionism

We cannot access the mind so should only look to explain behaviour of stimulus-response links we can measure

Holism evaluation

+ complete picture


+ acknowledges complexity and considers factors


- more hypothetical not empirical


- little predictive power


- neglects importance of biology

Reductionism evaluation

+ scientific approach


+ Easier explanation


+ High predictive power


- ignores complexity of behaviour and lacks focus on other influencing factors


- ignores context


Psychic determinism

Personality is determined by childhood experience, internal systems dtermine how people behave as adults

Hard determinist approach

Biological

Very soft determinist approach

Humanism

Alpha bias (culture)

Emphasises difference between cultures
(sometimes wrongly argues superiority)

Beta bias (culture)

Minimises differences between cultures

Ethnocentrism

Judging one culture by the norms of another

Emic

Research carried out in own culture

Etic

research carried out by observer of culture


(Can bring imposed etic)

Androcentrism

Study conducted on men but also generalised to females

Alpha bias (gender)

Differences between men & women exaggerated

Beta bias (gender)

Differences between men & women ignored

Androcentrism examples

Milgram (1963), Zimbardo, Asch

Gynocentric examples

Moscovici, Strange Situation

Alpha bias examples

Psychodynamic approach, Bowlby's monotropic theory of attachment, psychodynamic gender development

Beta bias examples

Social learning theory, behaviourist approach, Milgram