• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/5

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

5 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Aim
To assess whether anger-management programmes work with a group of adult male offenders.
Sample
50 prisoners who had completed an anger-management course and a control group of 37 who hadn't completed one. They were matched on the following three criteria: their responses to a cognitive behavioural interview; the Wing Behavioural Checklist (WBC) which was completed by prison officers rating 29 angry behaviours with scores of 0, 1 or 2 for the week before the interview; a self-report questionnaire on anger-management (AMA) with 53 items completed by the prisoners themselves.
Methodology
A quasi-experiment taking advantage of the two naturally occurring groups. The measures above were given to the prisoners in the treatment group before and after they completed the programme; the control group also got them twice but without intervention in between.
Results
There was a significant reduction in prison wing-based aggression in the experimental group scored lower on the self-report measures after completing the course but there was no difference in the control group. Overall, 92% of the prisoners in the experimental group showed improvement on at least one measure and 8% showed deterioration on both measures upon completing the course.
Conclusions
In the short term these prisoners appeared to be helped by the programme, but in this case we have no re-conviction data further down the line. It is interesting that 8% actually got worse, which would require further investigation.