• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/54

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

54 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
For a team working on an interdependent task...
-group goals are more effective than individual goals, a combination is group and individual goals is no more effective
-group goals=group goals AND individual goals
Level of organizational commitment is most predictive of:
-turnover
**organizational commitment: LOYALTY and concern for company's welfare
**commitment has minimal effects on productivity
**related to higher levels of motivation and satisfaction
Job dissatisfaction linked to...
turnover, absenteeism, and tardiness
Conscientiousness...
best predictor of job performance
Rest Breaks
-fourth and 8th hour of work (time of greatest fatigue)
-frequent short breaks are more effective than longer, less frequent ones
-rise in daily output despite the fact employees actually spend less time on the job
Relationship btwn job satisfaction and mental and physical health
there is a positive relationship between job satisfaction and mental and physical health
Situational Leadership: Telling
(high task, low relationship)
subordinate is low in ability and low in willingness; provides the employee with close supervision and specific instructions
Situational Leadership: Selling
(high task, high relationship)
low ability and high willingness
Situational Leadership: Participating
(low task, high relationship)
high ability and low willingness
Situational Leadership: Delegating
(low task, low relationship)
high ability, high willingness
needs assessment
beginning a training development
Stages in group development
forming, storming, norming, performing
Flex Time
greatest impact on absenteeism
Transformational Leaders
use framing
**defining organization's goals and activities in ways that make them more meaningful
Group heterogeneity and Task performance
-preferable on disjunctive tasks
(group members must select the solution or decision offered by one of the group members)
Mediation
-can offer specific recommendations but no formal power and can't impose settlement upon the parties
-INSTEAD role is to facilitate the flow of information btwn involved parties by opening the lines of communication and helps them progress towards an acceptable compromise
LEAST useful for eliminating rater biases
Likert Scale
Identical Elements
ensures transfer of training by providing a maximized degree of similarity btwn aspects of the learning and performance environments
Incremental Validity/Predictor
-moderate base rate with many applicants and few job openings
Mixed Standard Scale
-rater is provided with behavioral examples
-indicates whether ratee's performance is equal to, worse than, or better than performance described
Forced Choice
-consists of two to four alternatives
-rater selects the alternative that best or least describes the ratee
Social Loafing
-likely to occur during an additive task (when all group members are doing the same thing)
-individual exerts less effort as group member that if working alone
-increases as group size increases
-(decrease it) each individual sticks out
Job Analysis
Job Descriptions:what are u duties and responsibilities

Job specification: what skills and characteristics are necessary
Job Analysis vs. Job Evaluation
ordinarily, the former precedes the latter
-JOB EVAL is worth, salary
Comparable Worth
males and females should get paid same amount for doing the same job (continuously stated as being biased)
Leniency Bias
just like it sounds, too lenient, using the upper part of the scale
Strictness Bias
just like it sounds, too strict, using the lower part of the scale
Frame of Reference Training:
Frame of Reference for raters in order to avoid biases (you teach someone about the scales and how to rate ppl more effectively)
Subjective Measures-->Relative (Comparitive) Measures
paired comparison: compare each ratee with every other (think of hard to do if you have a lot of ppl working for you)

forced distribution: grading on the curve (lowest 10%, middle 40%)
Relative (Comparitive) Measures
-great for avoiding biases
-but not fair, placing ppl higher or lower than actuality
-prohibited for most federal jobs
-raters and ratees hate it
Absolute Measures
Critical Incident: have watch ppl but good, useful for feedback

Behaviorally-Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) (dimensions with behavioral anchors, again good feedback, may reduce bias, but requires a lot of time to make)
More Absolute measures
Forced choice:time consuming to make and disliked by raters, using more alternatives

Graphic Rating: susceptible to rater biases, on a likert-type scale
3 ways to avoid rater biases
-train the raters (FOR)
-Incorporate critical incidents/behavioral anchors
-use something other than a likert-type scale
The 80% Rule
-adverse impact, 4/5 rule
-hiring rate for the majority group is multiplied by 80% to determine the minimum hiring rate for minority group
Reliability
-you take a test again, and again, and get same results
-repeated measures yield similar results
Validity
measures what it was designed to measure (doing it's job)
low selection ratio/moderate base rate
-you want this
2 reasons why adverse impact might be happening
-differential validity: measure is valid for one group not the other

-Unfairness: when members of one group consistently obtains lower scores (but not reflected in actual performance)
Multiple Cutoff
-no, don't cut it off!!!
-noncompensatory
-must obtain minimal score
Multiple Regression
compensatory
ADA
requires companies with 25 or more employees to avoid discrimination
Tests of cognitive abilities are
the very best predictors of job performance (correlational coefficient r=.53 to .75)
Job Knowledge Tests
also good predictors, similar to cognitive tests BUT specific, only good with previous experience
Interviews
Interviews SUCK! Poorest predictor of job performance, but they get better if you use a structured interview with all applicants in the same way or panel
Work Samples
sometimes are good predictors, helps reduce turnover because it gives them a realistic idea of what job will be like
Personality Tests
not very good in prediction, EXCEPT in the area of conscientiousness because they are successful in job performance across all jobs…BIG 5 ([exception of conscientiousness], neuroticism, openess, agreeableness, extraversion) do not have impact otherwise
Types of Training
Job Rotation: on the job
Vestibule-off the job (simulated work environment)
Learning Principles:
• Active learning is more useful than passive learning…teach these principles to others!
• Identical Elements: it’s better to train people where they’re going to perform (i.e. it would be best to take licensing exam in the same room that you trained for it)

--overlearning: learning beyond the point of mastery
Behavioral Modeling
-an off the job technique
-learning is facilitated when a person observes a skilled worker perform the target behavior and is then provided with opportunities to practice the behavior
Kirkpatrick
• No matter how good your training is, if it doesn’t change the bottom-line (or how much money is going to be made), then it’s not effective!
Super
life career rainbow
-self concept
-life span (career development occurs over the life span, career maturity-->cope with developmental task as his life stage)
-Life Space
Holland
RIASEC
-realistic (mechanic, plumber)
-investigative (biologist)
-artistic
-social
-entepreneurial
-conventional (banker)
WORK SCHEDULES: compressed work week and flextime
compressed: improves satisfaction only

flextime: improve satisfaction, absenteeism, tardiness
Shift Work
night shift--> bad

even worse is rotating shift-->make it move forward with the clock