Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
54 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
For a team working on an interdependent task...
|
-group goals are more effective than individual goals, a combination is group and individual goals is no more effective
-group goals=group goals AND individual goals |
|
Level of organizational commitment is most predictive of:
|
-turnover
**organizational commitment: LOYALTY and concern for company's welfare **commitment has minimal effects on productivity **related to higher levels of motivation and satisfaction |
|
Job dissatisfaction linked to...
|
turnover, absenteeism, and tardiness
|
|
Conscientiousness...
|
best predictor of job performance
|
|
Rest Breaks
|
-fourth and 8th hour of work (time of greatest fatigue)
-frequent short breaks are more effective than longer, less frequent ones -rise in daily output despite the fact employees actually spend less time on the job |
|
Relationship btwn job satisfaction and mental and physical health
|
there is a positive relationship between job satisfaction and mental and physical health
|
|
Situational Leadership: Telling
(high task, low relationship) |
subordinate is low in ability and low in willingness; provides the employee with close supervision and specific instructions
|
|
Situational Leadership: Selling
(high task, high relationship) |
low ability and high willingness
|
|
Situational Leadership: Participating
(low task, high relationship) |
high ability and low willingness
|
|
Situational Leadership: Delegating
(low task, low relationship) |
high ability, high willingness
|
|
needs assessment
|
beginning a training development
|
|
Stages in group development
|
forming, storming, norming, performing
|
|
Flex Time
|
greatest impact on absenteeism
|
|
Transformational Leaders
|
use framing
**defining organization's goals and activities in ways that make them more meaningful |
|
Group heterogeneity and Task performance
|
-preferable on disjunctive tasks
(group members must select the solution or decision offered by one of the group members) |
|
Mediation
|
-can offer specific recommendations but no formal power and can't impose settlement upon the parties
-INSTEAD role is to facilitate the flow of information btwn involved parties by opening the lines of communication and helps them progress towards an acceptable compromise |
|
LEAST useful for eliminating rater biases
|
Likert Scale
|
|
Identical Elements
|
ensures transfer of training by providing a maximized degree of similarity btwn aspects of the learning and performance environments
|
|
Incremental Validity/Predictor
|
-moderate base rate with many applicants and few job openings
|
|
Mixed Standard Scale
|
-rater is provided with behavioral examples
-indicates whether ratee's performance is equal to, worse than, or better than performance described |
|
Forced Choice
|
-consists of two to four alternatives
-rater selects the alternative that best or least describes the ratee |
|
Social Loafing
|
-likely to occur during an additive task (when all group members are doing the same thing)
-individual exerts less effort as group member that if working alone -increases as group size increases -(decrease it) each individual sticks out |
|
Job Analysis
|
Job Descriptions:what are u duties and responsibilities
Job specification: what skills and characteristics are necessary |
|
Job Analysis vs. Job Evaluation
|
ordinarily, the former precedes the latter
-JOB EVAL is worth, salary |
|
Comparable Worth
|
males and females should get paid same amount for doing the same job (continuously stated as being biased)
|
|
Leniency Bias
|
just like it sounds, too lenient, using the upper part of the scale
|
|
Strictness Bias
|
just like it sounds, too strict, using the lower part of the scale
|
|
Frame of Reference Training:
|
Frame of Reference for raters in order to avoid biases (you teach someone about the scales and how to rate ppl more effectively)
|
|
Subjective Measures-->Relative (Comparitive) Measures
|
paired comparison: compare each ratee with every other (think of hard to do if you have a lot of ppl working for you)
forced distribution: grading on the curve (lowest 10%, middle 40%) |
|
Relative (Comparitive) Measures
|
-great for avoiding biases
-but not fair, placing ppl higher or lower than actuality -prohibited for most federal jobs -raters and ratees hate it |
|
Absolute Measures
|
Critical Incident: have watch ppl but good, useful for feedback
Behaviorally-Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) (dimensions with behavioral anchors, again good feedback, may reduce bias, but requires a lot of time to make) |
|
More Absolute measures
|
Forced choice:time consuming to make and disliked by raters, using more alternatives
Graphic Rating: susceptible to rater biases, on a likert-type scale |
|
3 ways to avoid rater biases
|
-train the raters (FOR)
-Incorporate critical incidents/behavioral anchors -use something other than a likert-type scale |
|
The 80% Rule
|
-adverse impact, 4/5 rule
-hiring rate for the majority group is multiplied by 80% to determine the minimum hiring rate for minority group |
|
Reliability
|
-you take a test again, and again, and get same results
-repeated measures yield similar results |
|
Validity
|
measures what it was designed to measure (doing it's job)
|
|
low selection ratio/moderate base rate
|
-you want this
|
|
2 reasons why adverse impact might be happening
|
-differential validity: measure is valid for one group not the other
-Unfairness: when members of one group consistently obtains lower scores (but not reflected in actual performance) |
|
Multiple Cutoff
|
-no, don't cut it off!!!
-noncompensatory -must obtain minimal score |
|
Multiple Regression
|
compensatory
|
|
ADA
|
requires companies with 25 or more employees to avoid discrimination
|
|
Tests of cognitive abilities are
|
the very best predictors of job performance (correlational coefficient r=.53 to .75)
|
|
Job Knowledge Tests
|
also good predictors, similar to cognitive tests BUT specific, only good with previous experience
|
|
Interviews
|
Interviews SUCK! Poorest predictor of job performance, but they get better if you use a structured interview with all applicants in the same way or panel
|
|
Work Samples
|
sometimes are good predictors, helps reduce turnover because it gives them a realistic idea of what job will be like
|
|
Personality Tests
|
not very good in prediction, EXCEPT in the area of conscientiousness because they are successful in job performance across all jobs…BIG 5 ([exception of conscientiousness], neuroticism, openess, agreeableness, extraversion) do not have impact otherwise
|
|
Types of Training
|
Job Rotation: on the job
Vestibule-off the job (simulated work environment) |
|
Learning Principles:
|
• Active learning is more useful than passive learning…teach these principles to others!
• Identical Elements: it’s better to train people where they’re going to perform (i.e. it would be best to take licensing exam in the same room that you trained for it) --overlearning: learning beyond the point of mastery |
|
Behavioral Modeling
|
-an off the job technique
-learning is facilitated when a person observes a skilled worker perform the target behavior and is then provided with opportunities to practice the behavior |
|
Kirkpatrick
|
• No matter how good your training is, if it doesn’t change the bottom-line (or how much money is going to be made), then it’s not effective!
|
|
Super
|
life career rainbow
-self concept -life span (career development occurs over the life span, career maturity-->cope with developmental task as his life stage) -Life Space |
|
Holland
|
RIASEC
-realistic (mechanic, plumber) -investigative (biologist) -artistic -social -entepreneurial -conventional (banker) |
|
WORK SCHEDULES: compressed work week and flextime
|
compressed: improves satisfaction only
flextime: improve satisfaction, absenteeism, tardiness |
|
Shift Work
|
night shift--> bad
even worse is rotating shift-->make it move forward with the clock |