• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/11

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

11 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Gibson V MCC


Invitation to treat

Invitation to treat is simply an expression of willingness to enter into negotiations with hope that they will lead to the conclusion of a contract at a later date.

Display of goods


General rule


Fisher V Bell


PSGB V Boot


Lefkowitz V GMSS

The display of goods for sale is an invitation to treat.

Exception


Display of goods


Chappleton V Barry

The display of goods can be considered as an offer when the courts find it unfair to leave the claimant without remedy i.e backward reasoning of prof. Atiyah.


Bowerman V ABTA

Advertisements


General rule


Patridge V Crittenden

It is an invitation to treat rather than an offer.


Parker CJ: it makes business sense to make advertisements as an invitation to treat.

Advertisement


Exception


Carllil V Carbolic Smoke ball Co

Advertisements which have a unilateral nature are offers.

Auction sale


General rule


British Car Auctions V Wright

An auctioneer by inviting bids makes an invitation to treat.


Harris V Nickerson: the advertisement of an auction sale is generally an invitation to treat.

Auction sale


General rule


British Car Auctions V Wright

An auctioneer by inviting bids makes an invitation to treat.


Harris V Nickerson: the advertisement of an auction sale is generally an invitation to treat.

Auction sale


Exception


Warlow V Harrison


Barry V Davies

They are considered to be offers when the words highest bidder or without reserve are added.


Martin B stated obiter that advertisements can only be considered offers if the auctioneer states terms which makes the invitation to treat a unilateral offer and this was then applied in Barry V Davies.


If there is a reserve price & it is exceeded then the same analysis as Barry should be adopted.

Tenders


General rule

Invitation to tender is simply an invitation to treat.

Tenders


General rule

Invitation to tender is simply an invitation to treat.

Tenders


Exception


Harvela V Royal trust of canada


Blackpool V Blackpool

They can be considered as an offer.


In Blackpool V Blackpool where an invitation to tender can be construed as both an ITT and a unilateral offer.


It is held that there is only an implied duty to consider the tenders.