• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/38

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

38 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Aristotle

Pre-modern




Father of modern western philosophy

St Augustine

Pre-modern




City of God: world without sin


City of Man: coercive law because humans are weak




Human autonomy <---> human law

St Thomas Aquinas

Reconciled lex Aeterna with lex Humana, forming Lex Naturalis: Reasoning of law of God which translates back to secular governance

Hugo Grotius

Using natural law (Aquinas) natural law to understand interstate relations - father of public international law




How does a secular state it derive its authority?


- Consent through the social contract


- natural rights = guarantees of individual autonomy

Hobbes

Social contract w state establishes the ruler = leviathan, w complete authority to prevent social conflict.




No natural rights. Law = SOCIAL CONTOL

Rousseau

Non-monarchical form of state government.




The state = Representative assembly of people


General will of the polity = law




Nationalist identity of the state

Kant

Pure practical reason - reason without intuition and moral inclination so that it is universal




Moral justification of modern state power


- Positive & negative freedom is uniformly coercively enforced >> social cooperation and autonomous action

Code Napoleon

Codified system of legal rules for a non-monarchical state that




(i) expresses the 'general will' of the people


(b) applies universally and comprehensively through the state




Nationalism: Unity of the state derives from shared cultural-political psychology

Carl von Savigny

German historical school of law to rival French code




Roman law (German law derives from Roman law)




vs




Germanic law (Study of Germany's distinct legal practices)

Max Weber

How does industrialization of society impact law?




Bureaucracy = regulatory shift to abstract rules to replace relational decision-making

Hans Kelsen

Foundations of law found in a legal system = self-referential collection of norms




State is purely legal construct established by constitution, legitimacy

Carl Schmitt

Law and action are different from another.



National legitimacy comes from the cultural will of the people and expressed in the sovereign



Sovereign = the exception who can override the law when the law conflicts with the people




State of emergency?

John Locke

Constitutional monarch in England




Social contract where "life, liberty and property" are at the core of natural rights. There is legitimacy in consensus and cooperation




State has coercive power because of the social contract/public law (grundnorm)

Jeremy Bentham

Tries to codify English law (ie Penal Code)




Utilitarianism: government purpose is to bring greatest aggregate happiness to citizens and maximize social welfare

John Austin

Law is the "commands of the sovereign" in either code or English common law

AV Dicey

1) Common law reasoning for finding England's unwritten constitution


2) Constitutional system lies in judiciary, free from democratization


3) English constitution is not legal rights but judicial norms/precedent




Westminster system



HLA Hart

Law as autonomous from morality




Primary rules = legal rules


Secondary = process rules




Rule of recognition for public officials to recognize secondary rules. A sociological fact

Joseph Raz

Direct law


Primary function of law = social control (ie preventing undesirable behavior, dispute resolution)




Secondary function of law = ensuring law's own existence (ie rules of procedure, decision-making, processes of changing the law, regulating laws.

Lon Fuller

Innate morality in legal practice. Locating morality in law w/o revoking that people are morally autonomous. Inner morality in the legal process




8 rules of law - sufficiently general, publicly promulgated, applies prospectively, generally understandable, free of contradictions, relatively stable, practically possible to obey, administered w/o wildly diverging from apparent meaning

Ronald Dworkin

Intrinsic morality of the law in its decision-making process. Right answer thesis is controversial




Interpretation: Norms of law converted into judgments in concrete cases. Balancing positivist legal norms (integrity) and moral considerations (justice). 3 stages of interpretation - take a collection of relevant rules, find intent and apply it to the case at hand. Modify it so that it's consistent w larger jurisprudence




Weighing the outcome vs spirit of the law intending to advance




Inner morality of law found in its interpretive process. Justice is an aesthetic

Law as reason/rationalization
Raz

Dworkin

Law as practical governance

Grotius - social contract, natural rights giving rise to autonomy


Hobbes - social contract, with Leviathan. No natural rights




To help us live and function in society




Finnis - Guide for action



Law as will

Gramsci - Problem of Hegemony/domination




Schmitt - The Exception makes law and doesn't have to follow




Code Napoleon

Legal pluralism

When there's a conflict of official legal system and normative customary systems

Transnational Law

Global economic order makes domestic/foreign distinctions v arbitrary.




Territoriality is important - rise of nationalism, and the perception of self-determination of "nation-states"




Cultural pluralism emergent from globalization.

Legal vs political constitution

Dowdle: Singapore should have a political constitution b/c it is in a dynamic context and the constitution is not normatively enforced




Kevin Tan: Singapore has a legal constitution - separation of powers is paramount.

Zhu Suli

The state's right to rule is in what they've done. Advancing the interests of the people, in exchange for authority. Pragmatic approach

Roberts

Law schools should focus on state law because that's what lawyers do. Non-state law shouldn't be regarded as law - widens the definition too much.




Where does non-state law derive its authority? From norms of society?

Twining

When we're lawyering, we have to look beyond law and non-state law to see the relations.



Boundaries between state law actors and non-state law actors are porous

Jessup

Germinal articulation of transnational law: Everyone in Europe followed the jus commune and jus gentium because of understanding of Christendom. Safeguarding interests of jurists and of their class.




Premises of transnational law within the European context. Westphalian conception of the state.




Did not change much until colonialism, and exploration.

Jurisprudence

An internal collection of norms that is made intelligible by its internal coherence and autonomy.

Neoliberalism

The political project to make traditional liberalism and the global democratic order as the sole model of future development.

Normative systems

- Customary/cultural: creations of colonialism


- Religious: Islamic courts/Sharia Law


- Economic/capital: lex mercatoria


- Functional: system of rules with purpose beyond commercial ie schools, hospitals


- Community: common identity/history

Shapiro

Law gets authority from the state

- It is moral to follow law


- Practicality - helps social ordering


- We obey the law for our own reasons, and not for any intrinsic morality of the law. We choose to obey the law because we think we have to, and at any time we can remove that authority

Posner

Judge then gathers materials not as a way of answering the case, but justifying interpretation. It is an intuitive process rather than inductive process.

Trial of Gandhi

Resistance against the authority of the law: Law has no authority if it doesn't have some sort of persuasive force. We can't blindly follow the law.

Gramsci

Dominance was a form of command and threat (traditional marxist view) But this is not enough. Other classes (the masses) would unite and overthrow the hegemon.




For control to be effective, the dominated classes have to consent. Consent to domination = hegemony (churches, schools, popular culture AKA civil society)




Hegemony = guide for choice, just in a bad way.




Hegemony doesn't allow you to make an informed choice, but it feels like a choice (social control)

Oakeshott (Optional)

Societas (legal constitution) - People bound together by common set of rules




Universitas (political constitution) - Not everyone is equal but they are working towards a common enterprise.