• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/48

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

48 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Miranda V. Arizona

Right to remain silent, anything said can be used against you in court, has right to attorney, one will be appointed if you cannot afford one.

Escobedos v. Illinois

Failure to recognize escobedos constitutional right to counsel

Smith V. Ohio

A right to protect their property from unsubstantiated police search

Ashcraft v. Tennessee

Established that inherent coercion could also bring about a false confession and therefore was not allowed

Maryland v. Buie

Which allowed for the searching of premises where a dangerous person may be hiding

Terry v. Ohio

Guaranteed an officers right to stop and frisk individuals when they are ensuring their safety

Stare decisis

Precedence

South Dakota v. Opperman

That the police could search a vehicle for the purpose of inventorying property while it was impounded

Substantive due process

The creation and definition of what a person's rights are

4th amendment

To be free from unreasonable searches and seizures

Protection from double jeopardy

5th amendment

5th amendment

Protection against self incrimination

Right to speedy trial

6th amendment

8th amendment

Right to reasonable bail

Frankpledge system

Required of all men to pledge peace to the king

Organizational stress

Completing paperwork, scheduling training, writing reports add to organizational stress

Thief takers

Captured criminals and returned stolen goods to victims of theft who offered the right reward

London metropolitan police force was founded by:

Sir Robert Peel

August Vollmer

Farther of modern law enforcement

Pendleton Act

An attempt to reduce corruption

Orlando Wilson did this

Streamlined hiring and training practices within the Chicago department

Kerner Commission

Addressed issues such as police brutality, riots, and discrimination

General jurisdiction

Can hear all cases, regardless of class severity

Circuit

A group of federal districts

Deterrence

To prevent a future crime from being committed

Rehabilitation

Goal that focuses on changing the offender through sentencing

Retribution

Criminals need to pay for their actions and sees corrections as solely a system of punishment

Subjected to hard labor everyday and silence was enforced

Auburn system

Pennsylvania system

Required absolute solitude while allowed to read only the bible

Parole

Early supervised release from prison

Recognizance

Just a promise to return and is similar to bail in that regard, but no money or collateral is put up

A delay or extension

Continuance

Plea bargain

When the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge

N.C.V.S means

National crime victimization survey

UCR means

Uniform crime report

Clearance rate

Crime that is resolved with an arrest

NIBRS means

National incident based reporting

How many US Marshals are there?

94

DEA means

Drug enforcement agency

Weeks v. US

Formed the basis of the exclusionary rule

Exclusionary rule

Incriminating evidence must be seized in accordance with the constitutional elements of due process

Silverthorne lumber v. US

Resulted in fruit of the poison tree

Mapp v. Ohio

Established fruit of the poison tree to all law enforcement throughout the country

Fruit of the poison tree

Illegally seized evidence is not admissible in court. Along with evidence derived from illegally seized evidence

Maryland v. Garrison

Evidence was admissible even if the information on the warrant was incorrect

Plain view doctrine

Harris v. US

Good faith exception to the exclusionary rule

Us. V. Leon

Illinois v. Rodriguez

If the police had a reasonable belief that a person had the right to consent to a search, they could legally search