• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/27

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

27 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
International strategic management has evolved by four factors:
1. Political factors
2. Technological factors
3. Social factors
4. Competitive factors
Verbeke distinguished between three types of advantages that a firm can have which create an FSA
1. Resources
2. Routines
3. Recombination skills
Why do wrong firms internationalise and right firms fail to internationalise? Two main reasons:
1. Bounded rationality
2. Bounded reliablility
Absolute (cost) advantage
The ability of one party to produce more of a good or service than competitors, using the same amount of resources
Comparative advantage
Lower marginal and opportunity costs
Heckscher-Ohlin model
Suggests that coutnries will tend to export products that use their abundant and cheap factors of production and will import products that use the country's scarce factors
The Uppsala model; four steps:
1. Gain experience of their domestic market
2. Begin to operate in a nearby market and then slowly penetrate far away markets
3. Choose to enter markets through export
4. After several years, etablish wholly owned or majority owned operations
Key features of the Uppsala model
1. Distance can mean one of two things
2. Commitments should be increases slowly
3. Commitments are reversible
The Born Global Concept is a type of firm with one of the following names
1. Leap-frog firm
2. International new ventures
3. High tech start-ups
4. Innate exporters
5. International entrepreneurs
Two dimensions determining what kind of firm it is (Born Global Concept)
1. Increasing number of activities coordinated across countries
2. Increasing number of countries involved
Filling in the Born Global Concept matrix
1. Export/import start-ups (low, low)
2. Multinational trader (low, high)
3. Geographically focused start-ups (high, low)
4. Global start-ups (high, high)
The Cluster Model
Suggests that a firm should internationalize to destinations with the necessary supplier, competitor, networks, to improve the efficiency of the firm's operations
Assessing country attractiveness; Country risk analysis:
1. Political risk
2. Economic risk
3. Operational risk
4. Competitive risk
Assessing country attractiveness: Market opportunities
1. Market size
2. Market growth
3. Quality of demand
Assessing country attractiveness: Industry opportunities
1. Quality of the competitive climate
2. Resource endowments
3. Government incentives
Transaction cost economics (TCE) suggests that:
- Activities are internalised when the (transaction) cost of internalisation are lower than the costs of outsourcing
- Activities are out-sourced when the (transaction) cost of out-sourcing are lower than the cost of internalising
The level of additional transaction costs incurres depend on three critical factors:
1. Asset specificity
2. Uncertainty/complexity
3. Frequency
Agency theory:
Agency cost arise from the seperation of ownership-and-control = principal-agent problem
Principal-agent problems arise when:
1. The principal pays the agent for perfeorming certain acts that are useful to the principal and costly to the agent
2. There are elements of the performance that are difficult (or costly) for the principal to observe
Agency cost increases in any contact with:
1. Information assymetry
2. Uncertainty
3. Risk
Agency costs can be solved by:
1. Fully specify all contracts
2. Monitor all agents of the firm
Foreign distributor
Firm sets up contract with local distributor
Strategic alliance allows a firm to:
1. Share risk and costs
2. Benefit from the parner firm's complementary recourses
3. allow for the development of capabilities to deliver products and services valued by the market
4. provide access to scarce resources
Two factors influencing the ease of transferring FSAs:
1. Mobility
2. Embeddedness (tacit of explicit)
Alliances are preferred when:
1. Each firm needs only a subset of FSAs
2. With M&A it would be hard to dispose the unusable FSAs
Merger and acquisition when:
1. The firm want full and direct control over the foreign market
2. FSA risk
3. Cost for M&A are lower than for FD or alliance
Problems with M&A
1. Cost of integration are underestimated
2. Expected benefits from the deal are overestimated