Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
23 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Successful deterrence
|
1. Definition of commitment 2. Communication of threat 3. Capabililty to back it up 4. Resolve to back it up
|
|
Successful compellence
|
1. Credibility (resolve) 2. Communication 3. Compromise (target needs face-saving way out; issues must be divisible) 4. Control - use of force carefully calibrated
|
|
Bush doctrine
|
1. Political regime determines foreign policy 2. Grave threats require preventive war 3. USA willing to act unilaterally 4. US must assert hegemonic power for peace
|
|
UN Peace Operations
|
1. Peace enforcement (collective security) 2. Peacekeeping (buffer between combatants) 3. Peace observation (monitor truce)
|
|
Functions of force
|
1. Compellence 2. Deterrence 3. Swaggering 4. Defensive
|
|
Why do states fail
|
1. Decrease in economic conditions 2. Increase in corruption 3. Increase in violence
|
|
Why do ethnic groups fight
|
1. Security dilemma - neither trusts the other 2. Importance of territory, issue indivisible 3. Offense dominant when groups so closely intermixed
|
|
Methods of transitional justice
|
1. Criminal trials 2. Truth commissions
|
|
Landowning aristocrats who dominate military and bureaucracy
|
Junker class
|
|
Institutionalism
|
Emphasizes international institutions
|
|
Societal theories
|
Assume that state does what power interest groups want
|
|
Statist theories
|
Looks at states' internal organization
|
|
Classical vs Neorealism
|
Classical says that states seek power out of human greed, neorealism says states seek power for security
|
|
Offensive vs Defensive Realism
|
Offensive says states try to gain as much power as possible; all strive for hegemony. Defensive says states only want enough power to remain secure
|
|
Offense-Defense Balance
|
Military technology and geography make a state offense or defense-prone. An offensive state is more likely to go to war because it is easier to conquer than to defend.
|
|
Internal vs External Balancing
|
Internal balancing is internal buildup of military force in a state, external is forming alliances with other states to balance the adversary's power.
|
|
Aspects of globalization
|
1. Trade - import/export 2. Finance - FDI/FPI 3. Migration - movement of people; typically they send earnings back home 4. Illicit - "black market"
|
|
Globalization causes
|
1. Lower cost of transportation/communication 2. Policy changes - liberalization and de-regulation, starting with developed countries and moving down
|
|
GATT
|
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade -Liberalized trade in rounds. Came out of Bretton Woods, replaced by WTO in Doha round 1994.
|
|
GATT Components
|
1. Non-discrimination (MFN) 2. Commitment to continuing negotiations - "round" system 3. Trade dispute resolution - Due process + rule of law
|
|
WTO
|
Replaced GATT in Doha round 1994. WTO agreements ratified in legislatures of all member states. WTO has stronger power of coercion (states act against cheaters) and covers a broad area = services, intellectual property, standards, griculture. Many industries untouched though
|
|
Heckscher-Olin Model
|
Countries have more of one factor of production. So they will export products that require this factor. Ex China exports clothes, imports cars, US vice versa
|
|
Stolper-Samuelson Theorem
|
Extension of Heckscher-Olin. Trade benefits the abundant factor in a country. Ex. USA trade w/ China helps USA capital owners and hurts USA farmers, vice versa in China. Eventually trade produces Factor Price Equalization.
|