• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/51

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

51 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Realism
individual level
Machiavelli
machiavelli
weak vs strong state leaders
do whats best for the state
Neo- Realism
systems level
ok to lust for power
Thucydidies
Hobbes
Thucydides
Melian Dialogue
Athenians took over Melos
Hobbes
constant state of war
everyone at an equal level
anarchy
social contract-order
5 assumptions of Neo-Realism
1) Anarchy
2) state most important actor
3) States and rational and unitary
4) Security trumps all
5) military force policy tool
power resources
long term
get actor to do what you want
tangible
intangible
Tangible power resources
GDP
wealth
population
natural resources
Intangible power resources
loyalty
trust to help you
reputation
political power
ability to achieve preferred outcome
int'l politics
relations among states
no boundaries
politics
who gets what
Conflict and cooperation/security
War
Terrorism
Balance of Power
Political Economy
How power relates to the economy
Debt
trade
rich v poor
Individual Level of Analysis
background and characteristics that might effect policymaking
State level of analysis
type of state
domestic policies
systems level of analysis
state interactions internationally
Security dilema
build up of arm by one state countermoves by another state
unstable
Arm race
build up of arms such as in security dilema- US and soviet union
Relative gains
when one party gains more than the other
neo-realists support
absolute gains
all party better off
neo-realists dont support
Balance of power
distribution of capabilities
multipolar
3 or more central powers
none dominant
bipolar
2 central powers
cold war
US and Soviet union
Neo- real stable
unipolar
only one dominant power
US
Liberalism
people are good in nature
political and economic freedom
individuals rational
progress for increased human freedom
copperation-interdependance
Neo-Liberalism
create order in the int'l system
int'l law
sustain cooperation possible
Neo-Liberalism Assumptions
1) Only some anarchy- inst and rules
2)state most important but other actors impact outcomes
3) differences in rationality- long v short term
4) multiple voices and perspectives
5) security most important when theres a direct threat
6) military force rarely used
Collective goods problem
all product available to everyone( tangible and intangible)
free riders
no incentive
benefits from goods
Institutions
state making mutual goods
trade offs in cooperation
Regimine theory
better good globally (trade)
norms
principles-embedded in regimine
rules- treaties
decision making- IGOs
Hegemonic stability theory
unipolar system
force imposes order
Democratic Peace hypothesis
no 2 democracies have gone to war with one another
Marxism
1)class antagonism- root
2) organizing production-historically identify
3) internal conflict- downfall of mode, new mode
4) capitalist mode best- go globally and downfall
5) powerful exploit weak
Post-Modernism
scientific method doesnt apply
bias on all, refer to txts
no single reality, multiple perspectives
Contructivism
socially constructed world
shared knowledge
material conception-based on shared experiences-marker
Liberal Feminism
Women act the same in positions of power
Differences between men and women trivial
expand talent pool- more knowledge and expeience
Difference Feminism
Womens way of knowing different than men
perceive world differently-peacekeeping, copperation
fund shift in system
Post modernist feminism
criticize overgeneralizations
questions assumptions
Conventional theories dont take gender into consideration
Conflict of interest
territory-succession
control of gov-sovereignty
indirect- soft power
direct-military
Conflict of Ideas
Ethniticity-majority v minority
religion- dominant religion, conflict of cultures
Group animosity structural
weak state, security dilema
group animosity political
political favoring, animosity
group animosity cultural and perceptual
religion
group history
GDP and military spending
% used, varies among states
Ways to pay for war
taxes
bonds
print money
looting
Mutually Assured destruction
Realist- leaders of nuclear states rational
permenent fixed address
threat to use military credible
2nd strike capability- dont strike first
Non proliferation treaty
no nuclear weapon transfer
disarmament talks
states w/o nuclear weapons denounce them
int'l atomic energy agency
internal affairs
uphold commitments to NPT
Humanitarian intervention
Civil war- refugees bad for other countries
defense of democracy
state failure
hidden strategic reasons
unilateral v multilateral
violations of humans rights- who is worthy of protection