• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/67

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

67 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

terrorism

1) use or threat of violence


2) political


3) civilians are targeted

secular government

non-religious government, does not follow any rules of religion

R2P

responsibility to protect

saverty

ability for a state to govern itself

unipolar world

one superpower (at this moment the United States)

bipolar world

two superpowers (till 1945 the United States and Russia)

confirmation bias

reject the evidence that is against previous beliefs

state

has land, government, and population

nation

people of the same ethnicity, language, culture

nation-state

a state built upon the nation (Israel built upon the beliefs of the religion)

world politics

the study of how different actors try to achieve and defend their ideas, and how it affects the world

schematic reasoning

when we know some informations about a thing/person and we shape our expectations for everything to be the same or better

cognitive dissonance

I'm on welfare, but the government does not help me (can't see the truth behind his beliefs)

mirror images

states see each other similarly (Russia thinks the same things about the USA that USA thinks about Russia)

enduring rivalries

long competition because of neutral hatred = fighting over long time periods = hard to solve because both sides see the issue in a different light

actor

a state, group, organization that plays a role in world politics

power

the factors that can make one actor change another actors preferences

state sovereignty

states supreme authority to manage any international affairs and foreign policies

IGO's = Intergovernmental Organizations

institutions run by the state that have the power to manage problems of the global agenda

NGO's = Nongovernmental Organizations

private institutions that want to push their own agenda, they can bring change into the world and influence international decision making (ex. World Wildlife Foundation)

levels of analysis

global influences - UN, NATO, EU


state influences - USA, Russia, Germany


individual - Barack Obama, Vladimir Putin

state level of analysis

how much power does the state have? (ex. nobody is worried that Latvia will take over the world, they have no power!)

global level of analysis

rich states decide the choices of poor states, they have the global power

ISIS

Islamic State of Iraq and Syria

ISIL

Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

daesh

"being stamped on", terrorist hate being called this name so politicians do it

perception is greater than...

reality

transformation

a huge change in political systems (page 16)

global systems

anarchy

there is no government (ex. the global anarchy has no government because there is no government of the World)

great powers

the most powerful countries (military and economically) in the global system

cycles

like deja vu feels like has happened in the past, but actually is a completely new situation

regional powers (hejeman)

Europe = Germany; South America = Brazil, etc.

P5 = United Nations = UN

United States


Russia


France


China


United Kingdom




the permanent members of the UN, only they have veto power. they all have nukes

P5 + 1

UN permanent members + 1 (right now Germany (does not have nukes) because of their economy)

sanctions

never really work, are made to make the other side suffer.


(ex not buying stuff from Iran so their economy goes down)

have nukes but are not in the UN

Pakistan


India


North Korea (DPRK)


Israel


South Sudan (not a concern because of their low economics)

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty

Pakistan, India, North Korea (DPRK), Israel and South Sudan cannot spread their nukes


at the time of signing the treaty:


1. if you have nukes, keep them but can;t give them to others


2. if you don't have nukes, can;t get them


3. states have the right for nukes for peaceful purposes (ex. medicine)

Kantian Democratic Peace Treaty = Golden Asher

1. two states with similar situations do not go to war with each other


- they are economically interdependent


- we have Chinas stuff, they have our debt

3 branches of the Government

1. Executive Branch


2. Legislative (Senate, House of Representatives)


3. Judicial (Supreme Court)

Supreme Court Members

Left Side - Kagam, Ginsbers, Breyer, Sotomeyor


Right Side - Scalia, Roberts (Chief), Alito, Thomas


Middle - Kenedy

where does the US get their oil from?

Canada, Mexico and the US

the rule of economics

supply and demand

Kellog Brian Act 1928

outlawed war as a method for settling interstate conflicts

theory

not a fact, an idea of how the world works

hypothesis

a test of the theory

neoconservative

political movement that stands for taking the US military power and helping other countries gain freedom and democracy

realism!!!


(there is a table on -isms in the book)

1. self-interest; stats fight for power and anarchy


2. there is no world government, everyone is for themselves

national interest

a state tries to gain something selfishly, but in order to do good for their country

relative gains

some cooperative participants gain more than others

security dilemma

tendency for states to see other states defensive arming as threatening

balance of power

peace can only happen if military is distributed to prevent a single superpower controlling the world

Iran vs Saudi Arabia

1) Iran = people like us, government does not


2) SA = people hate us, government does no

Taliban in Afganistan

the government in Afganistan

Taliban in Pakistan

terrorists (but not international terrorists)

universal jurisdiction

a political leader that has been accused of something and proven guilty can be arrested anywhere in the world, any time (for crimes against humanity)

liberalism

loves the UN


does not care about the states wants, more about the individual and international interests

neoconservatism

spreading of democracy by using violence if necessary (they make people believe in democracy)

femenism

fights for equal gender rights

constructivism

made up!


example - International Relations are made up! there is nobody governing what happens internationally, so the laws are technically not real.

consicutionism

evaluating actions based on consequences


ex. should we have free education? yes or no DEPENDING on the consequences.


changing the rules of the world.


ex. if everybody in the world woke up today and decided that the US does not exist, it would not exist.

diplomacy

communication and negotiation between two or more states that seek a good solution for both without using violence

zero-sum

what is gained by A is going to be lost by B, so there is a looser

collective security

a peace agreement between states, but if one state breaks it, all states will attack (ex. if Russia breaks peace with Latvia, all NATO states will attack Russia)

norms

generalized standarts of behavior

capitalism

1. your assets is not taken away to distribute evenly to others


2. divides people into classes


3. the poor stay poor, the rich stay rich


4. competition is the key goal on changing your class


5. the amount of your financial gain is seen as your success

socialism

1. the state collectively owns everything


2. the state distributes it's assets evenly between everyone


3. eliminating classes and giving everyone the same chance


4."free" education, welfare