• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/29

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

29 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

fukuyama view

liberalism



wants us to promote democracy and capitalism



believes modern society is the answer

Huntington view

realism



doesn't want to promote democracy and capitalism believes that it will create more war, not less



tradition over modernity-disruptive effects of modernity on traditional social forms



clash between democratic and autocratic group

kagan view

liberalism



unipolar world with America as the superpower an many great powers



conflict between liberalism and autocracy



yes involvement with other countries but more than just the spread of democracy. believes the spread of democracy shouldn't be the most important part of American foreign policy



believes tradition can never win over modernity



Kurtz view

realist. doesn't really believe in the inferring liberalist ideology but supports small amounts of interference in the rest of the world



doesn't favor tradition or modernity over the other. believes modernity isn't for everyone so do what ever works best for the state



same for democracy/capitalism and other governmental forms



zakaria view

a little bit of realism and liberalism. he expresses interest in the rest of the world succeeding yet he cares about the welfare of the us and their success



supporter of the spread/rise of democracy and capitalism



says that countries are becoming more modernized which is good



says the us should support the development and open up trade that way they can help the developing countries while also benefiting from them

realism

key actors: states



individual: selfish and power seeking



state: insecure, selfish, unitary, power seeking



international system: anarchic (war), balance of power stability when theirs unipolarity



major theorists: Thucydides, Machiavelli, hobbes, Morgenthau, waltz, Gilpin, mearsheimer, saint Augustine

liberalism

key actors: state, non governmental groups, international organizations



individual: good



state: selfish, can be good is they are democratic liberal or can be bad if they are authoritarian



international system: anarchy is controlled by interdependence among states; an international order



change: institutions and structure leads to the possibility of perpetual peace



major theorists: Montesquieu, kant, Wilson, keohane, doyle, ikenberry

radicalism:

key actors: social classes, elites, corporations



individual: actions are determined by economic class interests



state: agent of capitalism and the wealthy upper class



international system: very stratified and dominated by international capitalist system



change: radical change inevitable



major theorists: marx, lenin, hobson, prebisch




constructivism

key actors: people, elites, cultures



individual: creates meaning, bound by education, socialization, and culture



state and international: significance is socially constructed through discourse (communication and debate)



change: possible by means of discourse "anarchy war and peace is what we make of it"



major theorists: Foucault, derrida, kratochwil, hopf, wendt

levels of analysis in international systems

individual:



state: government, economy, interest powers, national interest



international system: alliances, norms/rules, corporations, intergovernmental organizations

plato

the republic, society should be ruled by the few intelligent good people



the people who govern are superior in the ways of philosophy and war (called them philosopher kings)



introduced class analysis and dialectal reasoning which were the bases for Marx's analysis

aristotle

first to use the comparative method of analysis



said states rise and fall largely because of internal factors

Thomas hobbs

a world without governmental authority or civil order where men rule by passions living without international authority: anarchy



described life in a state of nature as solitary, selfish, and brutish. individuals and society can escape from the state of nature through a unitary state; a leviathan where power is centrally and absolutely controlled



realism


jean Jacques rousseau

described the state of nature In both national and international society



state is an egocentric world with self preservation as main concern



argued that the solution is social contract where individuals gather in small groups and communicate to realize the general will


Immanuel kant

advocated a world federation of republics bound by the rule of law to achieve peace



sovereignties would remain intact but there s and federal order



believed that even though man was selfish he can learn new ways of cosmopolitanism and universalism

positive vs normative analysis

positive is descriptive, factual statements about the world and it uses scientific principles to arrive at objective, testable conclusions.



normative is prescriptive, value-based statements that usually use factual evidence as support, but they are not by themselves factual. its the process of making recommendations about what action should be taken or taking a particular viewpoint on a topic.

doyle view

"liberal internationalism"



pacifism


imperialism: expansion


internationalism: cooperation between states



international market leads to pace and security



liberal states benefit from a presumption of amnity non liberals suffer from a presumption of enmity

mearsheimer view

offensive realism: states care abut gaining power, aggressive action, and seek to increase power

types of realism

classical/human nature realism: states pursue self interest and have a "thirst for power"



defensive realism/structural realism: states aim to survive and seek security and they compete for power because its the best means for survival but they shouldn't seek too much power because it will upset the balance of power



offensive realism: the international system creates powerful incentives for states to look for opportunities to gain power at the expense of rivals. basically a states ultimate goal is to be the hegemon in the system in order to maximize their survival

bush doctrine

-protection of all people


-constructivist


-spread democracy to protect Americas security


-preemptive defense (don't wait until theres a real attack or threat get in there before it happens)


-unipolar world


-trade partnerships

wilsons 14 points

-self determination


-liberalism


-free trade


-peace without victory


-international communities


-transparency


-peace by arms reduction

Medvedevs 5 principles of Russian foreign policy

-spheres of influence: friendly relations with their neighbors


-multipolar world: basically screw the us they don't get to be in control and make all the rules


-protection of citizens: basically mess with us and well mess with you


-no isolation: doesn't want confrontation but doesn't want to be isolated


-respect for international law

synder view

realism



balance of power



3 major theories cant predict change

Westphalia treaty

1648 ended 30 years war



effects of treaty


-sovereignty in Europe: rights within own territory


-monarchs have power, church doesn't


-non interference with domestic politics

after Westphalia treaty

soverignity


national militaries


increased political centralization


capitalism in the west, feudalism still in the east


core states: Russia, Prussia, france, England, Austria

Europe in the 19th century

-nationalism


-concert of Europe: major powers meet to discuss power positions


-relative peace among great powers


-industrialization


-imperialism


-colonialism


between ww1 and ww2

-ottoman, Russian, and austro Hungarian empires collapse


-Germanys unhappy about ww1 settlement, fascism comes about and they align wihh Italy and japan


-league of nations is too weak to stop Germany, Italy, and japan

after ww2

-end of colonialism


-human rights atrocities led to the Geneva convention


-2 super powers: us and soviets


-decline of europe


-united nations


ending of cold war

-glasnost (political openness) and perestroika (economic restructuring) unravel communism


-soviet withdrawal from Angola and Afghanistan


-fall of berlin wall 1989


-let go of satellite countries


-Christmas day 1991 soviet union falls