Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
12 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Balfour v Balfour |
DOMESTIC
-Husband and wife divorced -Contract to pay wife money on the basis on love and affection
FLOODGATE ARGUMENT |
|
|
Jones v Padavatton |
DOMESTIC
-Mrs Jones (mom) made daughter leave job and go and study Barr -Mom brought a house in England -Mom sued for the possession of the house as daughter failed the exams
Mother had possession over the house |
|
|
Merritt v Meritt |
REBUTTAL
-Licence for occupation of land -Contract wasn't made on the basis on love and affection -Wife made the husband right the contract down -Intended to enter into a contract |
|
|
Parker v Clark |
-Parker solid there house and lived with Clark's -And brought a new car and meet household expanses
Dispute
Where substantial financial reliance under the agreement is more likely to be seen as intend and legal enforcement |
|
|
Tanner v Tanner |
-Married women living in the house of another man -In reliance on this promise moved out her rent controlled flat
Where substantial financial reliance under the agreement is more likely to be seen as intend and legal enforcement |
|
|
Albert v Motor Insurer's Bureau |
-Albert was passenger in a car- which got into a accident -Question of Intention -Similarly as taxi service - If so, liable to pay money |
|
|
Jones v Vernon's Pool Ltd |
GAMBLING
-Send coupons to defendants- but denied receiving it
But coupons had exclusion clause - not to send by post
Millions of coupons send in post |
|
|
Simpkins v Pays |
Plaintiff and defendants entered into a game -Upon winning game refused to share the money -They intented to enter into a relations -Held the plaintiff was entitled third £250 |
|
|
Esso Petroleum v Customs and Excise Commissioners |
-Esso produced millions of coins - Was expected to pay taxi for them - But coins were solid with petrol
There was intention to create legal relations with customers |
|
|
Edwards v Skywards |
-Pilots in the airlines were made redundant -Ex gratia payment
The agreement was enforcement and there was an intention to create legal relations |
|
|
Rose and Frank Company v Crompton and Brothers Ltd |
-Apellants were US company -They had a clause which excluded them to not be subjected to legal jurisdiction
Held that this clause was effective "of honor only and unenforceable" |
|
|
Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corporation |
-The defendants formed a subsidiary company -Lend £10 million to this company -Comfort letter -M ceased training
held comfort letter was not contractually binding promise. It was a statement of present fact |
