Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
30 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
What is an informal fallacy?
|
It is concerned with the meaning of the statement. Not regarding the form of the argument, but of the truth of it.
|
|
Fallacies of Ambiguity
|
Where the meaning of the statements is not clear
|
|
Fallacies of Relevance
|
Where the meaning is clear, but it does not address the right issues of the argument
|
|
Simple Ambiguity (Equivocation)
|
When a word or phrase is used with two or more meanings
|
|
Amphibole
|
The ambiguity of amphibole is one where the words are clear but the grammatical construction is not
|
|
Accent (emphasis)
|
Ambiguity of accent occurs when the accent, emphasis, or tone of voice changes the meaning
|
|
Significance (circumstance)
|
The ambiguity of significance is committed when conditions or circumstances change the meaning of the words
|
|
Argument ad Baculum (appeal to force)
|
It seeks to persuade by force
|
|
Argumentum ad Hominem (abusive)
|
This is argument by character assassination
|
|
Argumentum ad Hominem (circumstantial)
|
The argument is not an assault on the man's character, but on some special circumstances surrounding him
|
|
Argumentum ad Misericordiam (appeal to pity)
|
Accept this because you should fel pity (or sympathy) for the one involved
|
|
Argumentum ad Populum
|
This is the fallacy of deciding truth by opinion polls
|
|
Consensus Gentium
|
Accept this because most people believe it is true
This requires a majority opinion unlike ad Populum |
|
Argumentum ab Annis
|
All truth is subject to aging. It sets time as an authority, with new ideas being more valuable than old ones
|
|
Argumentum ad Futuris
|
The fallacy of "accept this because future evidence will support it." It appeals to the authority of progress. This is argument by anticipation, not demonstration.
|
|
Petitio Principii (begging the question)
|
This is an argument where the conclusion is sneaked into the premises
|
|
Straw Man
|
Is to draw a false picture of the opposing argument
|
|
Special Pleading
|
Only evidence that is presented is one sided and the opponent's evidence is left out
|
|
Ignoratio Elenchi (irrelevant conclusion)
|
An irrelevant conclusion gets the focus off of the point to be proved by substituting a related, but logically irrelevant, point for it. This is the more subtle fallacy of the two tactics.
|
|
Operat ergo Veritat
|
It works, therefore it is true
|
|
Red Herring
|
Accept this because this other subject is interesting (funny, witty, etc.)
|
|
Dictio Simpliciter (fallacy of the general rule)
|
Accept this in this case (with special circumstances) because it is true in general.
|
|
Hasty Generalization
|
It concludes too much from too little, choosing only the evidence it wants.
It confuses typical and atypical evidence, or ignores atypical evidence entirely, then jumps to a conclusion. |
|
Cliche
|
accept this because it accords with a popular maxim
|
|
Nothing Buttery
|
This argues that something is nothing but some aspect of it
|
|
Genetic Fallacy
|
The single issue focused on is the source or origin of an idea
"Something (or someone) should be rejected because it (or he) comes from a bad source." |
|
Complex Question
|
"Accept this (false) implication because of this other (true) implication."
|
|
Category Mistake
|
This is an "apple-and-oranges" error because it mixes up two ideas that don't belong together.
"Accept this because it falls into that category." |
|
Faulty Analogy
|
This fallacy deals with the misuse of analogies in logical argument
|
|
Argument of the Beard
|
"Reject this because it differs only in degree from what you already reject" It is a matter of degree. It tells us that if a line is hard to draw, then it is impossible to draw.
|