• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/30

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

30 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What is an informal fallacy?
It is concerned with the meaning of the statement. Not regarding the form of the argument, but of the truth of it.
Fallacies of Ambiguity
Where the meaning of the statements is not clear
Fallacies of Relevance
Where the meaning is clear, but it does not address the right issues of the argument
Simple Ambiguity (Equivocation)
When a word or phrase is used with two or more meanings
Amphibole
The ambiguity of amphibole is one where the words are clear but the grammatical construction is not
Accent (emphasis)
Ambiguity of accent occurs when the accent, emphasis, or tone of voice changes the meaning
Significance (circumstance)
The ambiguity of significance is committed when conditions or circumstances change the meaning of the words
Argument ad Baculum (appeal to force)
It seeks to persuade by force
Argumentum ad Hominem (abusive)
This is argument by character assassination
Argumentum ad Hominem (circumstantial)
The argument is not an assault on the man's character, but on some special circumstances surrounding him
Argumentum ad Misericordiam (appeal to pity)
Accept this because you should fel pity (or sympathy) for the one involved
Argumentum ad Populum
This is the fallacy of deciding truth by opinion polls
Consensus Gentium
Accept this because most people believe it is true
This requires a majority opinion unlike ad Populum
Argumentum ab Annis
All truth is subject to aging. It sets time as an authority, with new ideas being more valuable than old ones
Argumentum ad Futuris
The fallacy of "accept this because future evidence will support it." It appeals to the authority of progress. This is argument by anticipation, not demonstration.
Petitio Principii (begging the question)
This is an argument where the conclusion is sneaked into the premises
Straw Man
Is to draw a false picture of the opposing argument
Special Pleading
Only evidence that is presented is one sided and the opponent's evidence is left out
Ignoratio Elenchi (irrelevant conclusion)
An irrelevant conclusion gets the focus off of the point to be proved by substituting a related, but logically irrelevant, point for it. This is the more subtle fallacy of the two tactics.
Operat ergo Veritat
It works, therefore it is true
Red Herring
Accept this because this other subject is interesting (funny, witty, etc.)
Dictio Simpliciter (fallacy of the general rule)
Accept this in this case (with special circumstances) because it is true in general.
Hasty Generalization
It concludes too much from too little, choosing only the evidence it wants.
It confuses typical and atypical evidence, or ignores atypical evidence entirely, then jumps to a conclusion.
Cliche
accept this because it accords with a popular maxim
Nothing Buttery
This argues that something is nothing but some aspect of it
Genetic Fallacy
The single issue focused on is the source or origin of an idea
"Something (or someone) should be rejected because it (or he) comes from a bad source."
Complex Question
"Accept this (false) implication because of this other (true) implication."
Category Mistake
This is an "apple-and-oranges" error because it mixes up two ideas that don't belong together.
"Accept this because it falls into that category."
Faulty Analogy
This fallacy deals with the misuse of analogies in logical argument
Argument of the Beard
"Reject this because it differs only in degree from what you already reject" It is a matter of degree. It tells us that if a line is hard to draw, then it is impossible to draw.