• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/51

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

51 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Thirteenth Amendment
Applies to private conduct and state conduct

Only slavery violates the 13th Amendment

Congress can adopt laws under 13th A that prohibit private race discrimination
Commerce Clause
Congress can prohibit private establishments from discriminating based on race
Laws prohibiting private discrimination based on race
Can be adopted under
(1) the Thirteenth Amendment
(2) The Commerce Clause

NOT 14th A, § 5
Fourteenth Amendment, § 5
Congress can regulate state and local govts (NOT private behavior)
Where Private Behavior Involves State Action
(1) Public functions exception (private entity performs a task traditionally exclusively done by govt, like running a city)

(2) Govt affirmatively authorizes, encourages or facilitates unconstitutional activity
Examples of State Action
(1) Courts cannot enforce racially restrictive covenants
(2) Govt cannot lease premises to restaurant that racially discriminates
(3) State cannot provide free books to private schools that racially discriminate
No State Action
Constitution doesn't reach
(1) Private school 99% funded by federal govt
(2) NCAA order
(3) Private establishment with govt license
Provisions of Bill of Rights that are Not Incorporated
3rd A right not to have soldier quartered in home
5th A right to grand jury indictment in criminal cases
7th A right to jury trials in civil cases
8th A right against excessive govt fines
Rational Basis Test
Law is upheld if rationally related to legitimate govt purpose

Challenger has burden of proof
Intermediate Scrutiny
Law is upheld if substantially related to important govt interest

Govt has burden of proof
Strict Scrutiny
Law will be upheld if necessary to achieve compelling govt purpose

Least restrictive means must be used

Govt has burden of proof
Procedural due process
Procedures govt must follow to take away someone's
(1) life
(2) liberty
(3) property
Was there a deprivation of life, liberty or property?
Liberty: Loss of significant freedom provided by Constitution or a statute

Property: Failure to fulfill an entitlement (reasonable expectation of a benefit)

Requisite level of fault by govt: intentional or reckless (NOT mere negligence)
Emergency situations & Due process
Govt liable only if its conduct shocks the conscience
Termination of welfare benefits
Requires notice and hearing
Permanent termination of parental rights
Requires notice and hearing
Institutionalization of an adult (not emergency)
Requires notice and hearing
Termination of social security disability benefits
Post-termination hearing
Harm to reputation
NOT a loss of liberty
Punitive damage awards
Require
(1) jury instructions to guide discretion
(2) Judicial review to ensure award is reasonable

Factors to determine whether reasonable
(1) was D's conduct reprehensible?
(2) difference between amount of punitive damage award and criminal/civil penalties allowed for the same type of misconduct
(3) discrepancy between actual or potential harm to P and punitive damage award
Non-citizen held as enemy combatant
Entitled to challenge continued detention
US citizen facing criminal charges in foreign country
Can file habeas corpus petition seeking review of detention in federal court
Judicial bias
Judge must recuse if there is substantial risk of actual bias
Procedural due process analysis
(1) Liberty or property right?
(2) Deprivation by govt?
(3) Was due process afforded?
How to Decide Whether Process Was Sufficient
Balance
(1) Importance of interest to individual
(2) Ability of additional procedures to increase accuracy of fact finding
(3) Government's interests (efficiency, $)
Substantive Due Process
Does the govt have an ADEQUATE REASON for taking away person's life, liberty or property
Economic liberties
Rational basis test (min wage laws, consumer protection)
Takings Clause: Is there a Taking?
(1) Possessory Taking: Govt confiscation or physical occupation of property (e.g., require apt owners to install cable boxes)

(2) Regulatory Taking: Govt regulation leaves no reasonable economically viable use of the property

(3) Conditions on Development of Property: benefit is not roughly proportionate to the burden imposed

(4) Temporarily denying an owner use of property if Govt's action is UNreasonable
Is Taking for Public Use?
Required

Taking is for Public Use as long as Govt acts out of a reasonable belief that the taking will benefit the public

If not for public use, no taking is allowed
Taking: Is Just Compensation Paid
Look at reasonable market value of property at time of taking

Gain to Govt is irrelevant
Contracts Clause
Applies only to state or local interference with already existing contracts
When Can State Substantially Interfere with PRIVATE Contract?
Law must be
(1) a reasonably and narrowly tailored means of
(2) promoting an important and legitimate public interest
When Can State Substantially Interfere with GOVT Contract?
Law must be necessary to promote a compelling state interest
Ex Post Facto Clause
Neither federal nor state govts can adopt Ex Post Facto Clause (only applies to criminal liability)

Law that
(1) criminally punishes conduct that was lawful when done or
(2) increases punishment for crime after it was committed or
(3) makes it easier to prove commission of crime after it was committed
Privacy rights (fundamental rights)
Right to marry
Right to procreate
Right to custody of one's children
Right to keep family together (extended family)
Right to control children's upbringing
Right to buy and use contraceptives
Right to abortion
Right to engage in private same-sex consensual activity
Right to abortion before viability
(1) states cannot prohibit abortions b4 viability
(2) states can regulate abortions as long as they do not create an undue burden on ability to obtain an abortion
NOT undue burden
24 hour waiting period

requirement that abortions be performed by licensed physicians

prohibition on partial birth abortions

Parental notice and consent laws (but judge must be able to approve the abortion by finding it would be in minor's best interests, or that she is mature enough to decide for herself)
After viability
states may prohibit abortions, except where necessary to protect woman's life or health
Subsidizing abortions
Govt never required to pay for abortions
Examples of undue burdens
Spousal consent and notification laws
Refusing medical treatment
Competent adults have right to refuse medical treatment
Even if treatment would save life

But state can require clear and convincing evidence that a person wanted treatment terminated

State can prevent family members from terminating treatment for another

NO constitutional right to physician assisted suicide
Second Amendment
Individuals have a right to have weapons for self defense (level of scrutiny is unclear)
Consensual homosexual activity
Individuals have right to engage in private, consensual same-sex activity (level of scrutiny is unclear)
Right to domestic travel
Laws that must meet strict scrutiny
(1) laws that prevent people from moving into state
(2) laws requiring person to live in jurisdiction for certain period to get a benefit (can't make ppl wait longer than 50 days to vote)
Right to international travel
Rational basis test
Right to vote
Laws that deny some citizens right to vote must meet strict scrutiny (poll tax, pay fee, own property)
One Person -- One Vote
Must be almost exact mathematical equality between congressional districts within a state
At Large Elections
unconstitutional if there is proof of a discriminatory purpose

Otherwise, constitutional
Use of Race in Drawing Election District Lines
Must meet strict scrutiny
NOT fundamental rights
(1) right to practice a trade or profession
(2) right to physician assisted suicide
(3) right to education

--> rational review
Level of scrutiny unknown
(1) right to engage in private consensual same-sex activity
(2) right to refuse medical treatments
(3) right to possess firearms