Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
38 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
OVERVIEW of Indiana Con Law (Tested 19/24 past exams) Four Main Areas: |
I. The Structure of Indiana's Governement II. The Bill of Rights and State Institutions III. Education IV. Finance, Corporations and Indebtedness |
|
INTRODUCTION:
(4) Step Analysis to Reviewing Indiana Constitutional Claim? |
1. Text of the provision,
2. History of the provision's passage,
3. General purpose and structure of the constitution, and
4. Case precedent. |
|
SPECIAL LAWS: |
Persons |
|
SPECIAL LAWS: |
1. Will a general law work?
2. If yes, is the law special in application? |
|
SPECIAL LAWS: |
Substantial Deference |
|
SPECIAL LAWS: |
1. Rational Basis for the classification? |
|
SPECIAL LAWS: |
- granting individual divorce |
|
GERMANENESS (Single-Subject Laws): |
Laws must be confined to a "single subject" |
|
GERMANENESS (Single-Subject Laws): |
Substantial Deference
|
|
GERMANENESS (Single-Subject Laws): |
"Rational Unity" |
|
Judicial Branch:
Is the Judicial Branch allowed to give "advisory opinions"? |
YES |
|
Judicial Branch: |
Death Penalty cases |
|
CORE VALUES or FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: |
The State cannot impose a "Material Burden" on a "Core Constitutional Right" |
|
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: |
1. matters of public concern, and |
|
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION:
Truth in prosecutions for Libel -Burden is on alleged Defamer to prove truth |
Truth is an affermative defense to libel. |
|
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION:
Truth in prosecutions for Libel: Actual Malice -Matters involving public or general concern |
For both Public and private individuals must prove actual malice to recover in defamation cases involving matters of public or general concern. |
|
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: |
1. Right to Worship |
|
FREEDOM OF RELIGION: |
NO
YES |
|
EQUAL PRIVILEGES & IMMUNITIES: |
Substantial Deference
|
|
EQUAL PRIVILEGES & IMMUNITIES: |
1. The legislation must be reasonably related to inherent characteristics that distinguish the unequally treated classes; and |
|
EQUAL PRIVILEGES & IMMUNITIES: |
Is the preferential treatment "rationally related" to the law in question? |
|
EQUAL PRIVILEGES & IMMUNITIES: |
If people who are "similarly situated" in the same class, are treated differently, the law will be struck down. RB review, likely Consitutional. |
|
EQUAL PRIVILEGES & IMMUNITIES: |
To prove or disprove "every conceivable basis" which might have justified the classification. |
|
EQUAL PRIVILEGES & IMMUNITIES: |
Article 1 Section 12 Open courts: all courts shall be open and every person shall have a remedy by due course of law without delay. |
|
Search and Seizure: |
the search was "Reasonable"
|
|
Right to Confrontation: |
FACE - to - FACE
|
|
Arrest or Confinement without "UNNECESSARY RIGOR": |
Cases of "Extreme Physical Force" |
|
CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT:
Indiana's two (2) Requirements: |
1. Proportionality of Sentence |
|
CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT: |
1. Nature and Gravity of "Current Offense", and |
|
CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT:
Appellate Court Power to Set New Sentence |
AP ct has power to set new sentence where it determins that Tr Ct's sentence is unconsitutional. |
|
DOUBLE JEOPARDY: Criminal Defendant 2 test: |
1. Statutory element test: one element that is separate and distinct from the other offense.
2. Actual evidence test: Whether actual evidence show that each challenged offense was established by separate and distinct facts. |
|
Penal Code Shall be Founded on "REFORMATION": |
As a Whole
not to Individual Treatment |
|
RIGHT TO COMPENSATION FOR "TAKINGS": |
Value of Property |
|
RIGHT TO COMPENSATION FOR "TAKINGS": |
1. Have the services been historically paid for? |
|
EDUCATION: |
1. uniform system |
|
PROPERTY TAXATION: |
Property Wealth
|
|
PROPERTY TAXATION:
"Uniform and Equal" Taxation is NOT based on? |
FMV
|
|
PROPERTY TAXATION: |
1. uniform assessments |