• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/12

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

12 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Gauthier (1999)

Two prosopagnosics tested, found that they couldn't match target objects or faces to a sample (impaired face and object matching)

Gauthier (1997)

Experts on greebles recognised parts of greebles more quickly when they were part of the greeble they had studied them from (global processing)




This effect wasn't found for novices or when the greebles were inverted

Gauthier (2000)

FMRI shows greeble experts recruit FFA and OFA when viewing greebles


Other homogenous categories like birds and cars produce more FFA activation than other familar objects


Expertise can be used to predict the relative activation of the FFA for birds vs Cars




She suggests expert/high level categorisation is what recruits the FFA

Freiwald and Tsao (2010)

6 face selective patches identified by single cell recordings


Middle patches are viewpoint selective


AL is symmetrically viewpoint specific


AM has 73% Identity selective cells with consistent response to certain faces from all angles, apart from the back of the head



Sugita (2008)

Monkeys deprived of faces for 6-24 months show preference for monkey + human faces


Neuronal pruning can be used to make the infant monkeys specialise in discriminating human or monkey faces - you expose them to only the faces of the species you want them to discriminate and they lose ability in the other




Evidence for genetics and environmental critical period

Nelson (2001)

Review of literature on whether faces are a special class of processing.


Support for faces being seen as a separate class of objects within 6 months.


Face recognition is likely 'experience-expectant'


Early specialisation leads to lack of later plasticity (adults fail to recover after damage)


More research needed on what experience, when, and how long for

Nelson (2001) - Quote

'Tissue in the inferotemporal cortex becomes specialised, and continued exposure maintains the tissue until it becomes dedicated to face recognition'

Harris (2012)

On spectra of face emotions, the pSTS responds with equal changes in intensity to spectrum changes of the same distance.The amygdala has larger changes in response when the spectrum change crossed a perceived category boundary

Harris (2014)

The changes in response intensity in the amygdala following perceived emotional category changes are not dependent on identity




As long as the distance on the spectrum is the same, replacing the identity of the face doesn't significantly change the response

Richler (2011)

Face recognition is disproportionately impaired by inversion


But this study shows that they are processed in qualitatively the same way, but quantitatively it is less efficient and takes a longer time to occur

Joo (2015)

Trained model to predict perceived traits using facial attributes


Used the model to predict real world events where first impressions affect the outcome




Predicted political elections 67% of the time


Predicted political party affiliation 61% of the time




Analysis reveals governers are more likely elected if young and masculine faces, senators more likely if old, rich and non-energetic faces



Driver (2005)

Created morph continua between famous faces. Somepairs of faces were:Identical, 30%different but perceived as the same identity, 30%different across the identity threshold




IOG - Sensitive to physical changes


FFA - Sensitive to identity rather than physical changes


Bilateral anterior regions - Sensitive to changes varied by pre-experimental familiarity