Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
31 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Marbury v Madison 1803
|
principle of judicial review by declaring part of Judiciary Acr of 1789 unconstit
|
|
|
Fletcher v Peck 1810
|
the first case to declare a state law unconstitutional
|
|
|
McCulloch v Maryland 1819
|
a state cannot tax an instumentality of the federal govt
|
|
|
Trustees of Dartmouth College v Woodward 1819
|
private charters are protected by Constitution
|
|
|
Cohens v Virginia 1821
|
fed courts have jurisdiction over state cases involving federal rights
|
|
|
Gibbons v Ogden 1824
|
fed govt has right to control interstate commerce
|
|
|
Cherokee Nation v Georgia
|
declare Cherk. dependent domestic nation possessing some sovereignty
|
|
|
Worcester v Georgia
|
georgia has no force in Cherokee territory
|
|
|
Commonwealth v Hunt 1842
|
Workers have right to organize
|
|
|
Dred Scott v Sandford 1857
|
slaves were porp and remained slaves, even when taken to fee territories
|
|
|
Ex Parte Milligan 1866
|
fed courts are open during wartime, military courts do not take precedence
|
|
|
Munn v Illinios
|
when private property affects public interest, states can act when federal policy is absent
|
|
|
Wabash, St. Louis, and Pacific Railroad Co v Illinois 1886
|
only fed govt can regulate interstate commerce
|
|
|
US v EC knight Co.
|
1895 - first case under Sherman Antiturst Act; manufacturing is not the same as commerce
|
|
|
Plessy v Ferguson 1896
|
sepearate but uqual
|
|
|
Insular Cases
|
constitution does not follow the flag, congress determine the procedural rights of a territory
|
|
|
Northern Securities Co. v US
|
A holding company owning stock of competing railroads violates Sherman Antitrust Act
|
|
|
Muller v Oregon
|
upheld women's work hour laws
|
|
|
Danbury Hatter Case (Lowe v Lawler) 1908
|
a union boycott violates the Sherman Antitrust Act.
|
|
|
Schenck v US 1919
|
no freedom is absolute; every act must be judged according to circurmstances, clear and present danger test
|
|
|
Adkins v Children's Hospital 1923
|
denied congressional and state regulation of a minimum wage
|
|
|
Schechter Poultry Corp. v US 1935
|
declared the national industrial recovery act unconstitutional
|
|
|
US v Butler
|
Agricultural Adjustment Act 1933 unconst.
|
|
|
National Labor Relations Board v Jones and Laughlin Steel CO. 1937
|
upheld the National Labor Relations Act
|
|
|
West Virg. BoEducation v Barnette
|
reverse, jehovah's witnesses can't get expelled for not saluting Amer Flag
|
|
|
kOREMATSU V us
|
Upheld arrest conviction of Korematsu for not complying with military order to go to relocation camp
|
|
|
Brown v Bo Education of Topeka 1954
|
ended segregation of public schools
|
|
|
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
|
lawyer must be provided to those charged with felony and can't pay
|
|
|
Escobedo v Illinon
|
lawyer must be present in police interrogation before indictment is made
|
|
|
mIRANDA V Arizona 1966
|
accused right to remain silent and must be informed their rights
|
|
|
Roe v Wade
|
women right to chose abortion
|
