• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Impeachment by Contradiction
--if matter is material, can use EE.

--if matter is collateral, can't use EE.
Impeachment via misdemeanor not involving dishonesty
inadmissible.
Impeachment by Bias or Motive
Foundation: must be asked about it first, with opp to explain or deny before EE introduced.

(usually used for Policy (insurance, settlement offer) exclusions..remember you need Opp to Deny/explain)
Impeachment by ANY crime involving dishonesty
Court has no discretion to bar. Must come in.
Impeachment by Felony not involving dishonesty
if D: probative value must substantially outweigh prejudicial effect.

If W: normal 403.
Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statement
--cross examination, or by EE

--EE requires foundation (explain/deny),

--no EE allowed if collateral matter

--if hearsay declarant, no foundation (explain/deny) just let in.

--if PIS under oath --> to prove and impeach

(CEC: whether under oath or not can prove and impeach)
Limitations
--more than 10 years from date of conviction or date of release (whichever later) --> inadmissible.

--juvenille convictions = inadmissible.

--conviction obtained in violation of CTT

--pardoned based on innocence or pardoned and person doesnt commit a crime again.
Foundational requirements by impeachment by conviction
Can be shown by direct, cross-examination of W, or by simply introducing record of judgement.
Impeachment by Specific Instances of Conduct
--Must be probative of truthfulness

--can use OT/RT that are probative of truthfulness

--CANNOT use EE.
Sensory Deficiences
EE admissible,

or on cross examination (eliciting)
Prior Consistent Statement
admissible only if credibility attacked.

must be made before motive to lie arose.
California: Crime of Moral Turpitude
lying

violence

theft

extreme recklessness

sexual misconduct

(scienter stuff, not negligence stuff)
California: Felonies
Moral Turpitude Felony: Admissible, subject to 352.

Non-moral turpitude felony: Inadmissible.
California: Misdemeanors
ONLY allowed in CRIMINAL cases,

and must be misdemeanor of moral turpitude (due to prop 8)
California:

Impeachment via Specific Instances of Conduct
CEC kills it, Prop 8 revives it for Criminal cases (if involves moral turpitude). And can use EE.