Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
41 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
|
Inspection |
An evaluation that measures performance against a standard and should identify the root cause of any deviation. |
|
|
|
Standard |
The way things should be. |
|
|
|
Principles of Army inspections |
1. Purposeful 2. Coordinated 3. Focused on feedback 4. Instructive 5. Followed up |
|
|
|
Principles of Army Inspections Purposeful |
Related to mission accomplishment |
|
|
|
Principles of Army Inspections Coordinated |
Does the inspection replicate or compliment another inspection? |
|
|
|
Principles of Army inspections Focused on feedback |
Written inspection reports |
|
|
|
Principles of Army Inspections Instructive |
Teaching and Training is the overreaching purpose |
|
|
|
Principles of Army Inspections Followed up |
To ensure the implementation of corrective actions |
|
|
|
Purpose of the OIP |
To coordinate inspections and audits into a single, cohesive program focused on command objectives |
|
|
|
Role of the IG in the OIP |
-Develop the IG inspection program -Advise and mentor commanders and staffs on inspection policy -Advise the commander on OIP effectiveness -Conduct IG inspections |
|
|
|
Categories of inspections |
1. Command inspections 2. Staff inspections 3. IG inspections |
|
|
|
Command inspections Initial command inspections |
ARFORGEN -All components during reset phase Non-ARFORGEN -90 days for Active Component -180 days for NG and USAR |
|
|
|
In order to be a command inspection... |
The commander must be present and participate |
|
|
|
ICI vs SCI |
ICI identifies unit strengths and weaknesses and cannot be used to evaluate a commander SCI measures progress and reinforces goals and objectives established during the ICI ICI-Identifies SCI-Measures |
|
|
|
An inspector General Inspection should... |
-Pursue systemic issues -Identify sub-standard performance and determine the root cause |
|
|
|
Who may direct an IG inspection? |
1. Secretary of the Army (SA) 2. Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA) 3. Vice Chief of Staff of the Army (VCSA) 4. Commander (Directing Authority) 5. The Inspector General (TIG) |
5 |
|
|
What is the lowest level organization win which a commander has a staff to perform internal inspections on subordinate units as part of an OIP? |
Battalion level |
|
|
|
IG root cause analysis CAUSES |
-Don't know -Can't comply -Won't comply |
|
|
|
What are the three phases of the inspections process? |
-Preparation Phase -Execution Phase -Completion Phase |
|
|
|
What are the components of the preparation phase? |
Research Develop Concept Commander approval Plan in detail Train up Pre inspection visits |
|
|
|
What are the steps of the execution phase? |
Visit units Update the commander Analyze results and crosswalk Out brief the proponent |
|
|
|
What are the steps of the completion phase? |
Outbrief the commander Taskers Finalize the report (Handoff if necessary) Distribute the report Schedule follow up |
|
|
|
Prep phase RESEARCH |
Narrows the scope of the inspection purpose and inspection objectives |
|
|
|
Prep phase Commander approves the concept |
The physical output of this step is the one page inspection directive |
|
|
|
Prep phase - plan in detail INFORMATIIN GATHERIMG DOMAINS |
- Interviewing - Sensing sessions - Document reviews - Observations - Surveys and questionnaires |
|
|
|
Prep phase - plan in detail NOTIFICATION MEMO |
Officially notifies the unit or staff agency that an inspection is forthcoming Should go out al least six weeks before first unit visit |
|
|
|
Prep phase - last step PRE INSPECTION VISITS |
Helps to validate and refine your inspection methodology and your information gathering tools Do not use the information gleaned in this inspection in the final inspection report |
|
|
|
Execution phase IN PROCESS REVIEW |
The purpose of the IPR is to share and discuss information the team had gathered so far. |
|
|
|
Execution phase CROSS WALKING |
The purpose is to verify or validate the accuracy of what you saw, read or, heard May take you vertically up the chain or horizontally across command lines. |
|
|
|
Execution phase 5 PARTS OF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FORMAT |
1. Finding statement (thesis) 2. Standard 3. Inspection results 4. Root Cause 5. Recommendation (Should ID or tag the proponent) Proponent is the person or staff agency you recommend to fix the problem. |
|
|
|
Execution phase - outbrief the proponent WHO IS THE PROPONENT?
WHO IS THE PROPONENT? |
The person or staff agency responsible to fix the problem You brief them as a courtesy, not to get their approval |
|
|
|
Completion phase (if necessary) HANDOFF |
Handoff is the transfer of a verified finding to a higher level agency or command that can correct the problem |
|
|
|
Completion phase - Distibute the report INSPECTION REPORTS MUST |
- Be free of unit or individual info - Will not be used for adverse action - Will not be used to compare command or commanders - Contains appropriate markings (FOUO statement) |
|
|
|
In compressed IG inspections... |
-IGs make compress some steps by combining others but we'll follow each step of the process. -Adhere to the 5 inspection principles outlined in AR 1-201 |
|
|
|
IG responsibilities for Intelligence Oversight |
- Inspect OIP to ensure compliance with AR 381-10. - Report any questionable activities within 5 days to SAIG-IO in accordance with procedure 15. - ensure that inspected personnel are familiar with and know how to report questionable activities in accordance with procedure 15. |
|
|
|
Intelligence components |
G2 S2 Anything with MI in the title Any unit conducting intel |
|
|
|
IO inspection methodology |
- Identify your commands intelligence components - Involve your local Staff Judge Advocate - Request a briefing from these intelligence components on their program to comply with AR 381-10 - Quiz unit or activity members on AR 381-10 using scenarios ( see the IO guide appendix F) - Phisically check the intelligence files of US person info - Determine if the unit or activity knows about procedure 15 and how to report a questionable activity |
|
|
|
Who can submit an IGAR? |
Anyone. |
|
|
|
What is a DA form 1559 used for? |
- Base control document. - Document workload. - Identify trends. - Identify systemic issues. |
|
|
|
IGAP Process |
|
|
|
|
7 step IGAP STEP ONE 5 FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS |
1. What do you want the IG to do for You? 2. Do you have any supporting documentation? 3. Have you requested assistance from any other source or agency? 4. Have you given your chain of command and opportunity to address the problem? 5. What is your status? |
|
