Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
22 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
IDENTIFY THAT THE NATIONAL CONSENSUS THAT RESULTED FROM THE CHURCH COMMITTEE ERA RESTRICTED INFORMATION SHARING AND OTHER COOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES BETWEEN THE IC AND LEA'S |
THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY AND LEA'S ARE SEPARATE AND THEIR ARE RESTRICTIONS ON COLLECTION, RETENTION AND DISSEMINATION |
|
|
DESCRIBE HOW THE CONCEPT OF THE "CRIMINAL STANDARD" SERVES TO DISTINGUISH LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES FROM THE IC ACTIVITIES |
DOMESTIC INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION IS ACCOMPLISHED PRIMARILY BY LEA'S NOT THE IC; REASON FOR THIS IS A CONCEPT KNOWN AS THE "CRIMINAL STANDARD" FOCUS IS TO BALANCE CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE NEEDS AGAINST THREATS TO PRIVACY & CANNOT COLLECT IF SOLEY TO MONITOR THE EXCERCISE OF 1ST AMENDMENT OR OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS |
|
|
DESCRIBE HOW THE TERM "U.S. PERSON INFORMATION" AFFECTS THE IC'S ABILITY TO COLLECT, RETAIN AND DISSEMINATE INFORMATION |
THE IC CANT LOOK AT US PERSONS WITHOUT A VALIDATED COLLECTION REQUIREMENT
|
|
|
DESCRIBE WHY THE IC'S NECESSITY (AND LEGAL REQUIREMENT) TO PROTECT ITS SOURCES AND METHODS MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR LEA'S TO USE IC COLLECTED INFORMATION IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
|
SOME SOURCES AND METHODS COULD BEDAMAGED BY PUBLICIZING THEM IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL
|
|
|
IDENTIFY THAT AUTHORIZED UNITED STATES IC COLLECTION ACTIVITIES VIOLATE THE DOMESTIC LAW OF THE FOREIGN COUNTRIES IN WHICH THEY ARE CONDUCTED
|
|
|
|
DESCRIBE HOW THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT (FISA) AUTHORIZES INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY COLLECTION ACTIVITES WITHIN THE UNITED STATES WHILE PROTECTING THE SOURCES AND METHODS OF THESE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
IDENTIFY THE PRINCIPLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE OBJECTIVES OF TITLE-III (T-III) ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE (ELSUR) AND THE OBJECTIVES OF FISA ELSUR
|
T-III IS A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE TOOL; TIII'S AUTHORIZE ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE FOR CERTAIN, BUT NOT ALL, DOMESTIC CRIMES FISA IS A DOMESTIC FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE & COUNTERINTELLIGENCE COLLECTION AUTHORITY |
|
|
DESCRIBE WHAT THE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION PROCEDURES ACT (CIPA) IS DESIGNED TO DO
|
INFO SHARING; A WAY FOR THE IC TO SHARE INFORMATION WITH LEA'S FOR USE IN TRIAL |
|
|
IDENTIFY THE PRINCIPLE OBJECTIVE OF THE CONCEPT KNOWN AS "THE WALL" AS IT EXISTED PRIOR TO 9/11 BETWEEN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) |
|
|
|
DESCRIBE THE PROS AND CONS OF OVERSIGHT OF FEDERAL ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
DESCRIBE THE MEANING OF THE TERM "SURREPTITIOUS ENTRY" (AKA DELAYED NOTICE SEARCH WARRANT OR SNEAK AND PEEK WARRANT) |
CHANGE TO FISA RULE; ALLOWS A NEW STATUTORY AUTHORITY BY WHICH TO ISSUE "SNEAK AND PEEK" SEARCH WARRANTS |
|
|
ARTICULATE THAT POST-9/11 CHANGES ANNOUNCED IN THE PATRIOT ACT ENHANCED THE GOVERNMENTS ABILITY TO SHARE FEDERAL GRAND JURY INFORMATION THAT RELATES TO COUNTERING TERRORISM AND OTHER NATIONAL SECURITY THREATS TO THE UNITED STATES |
THE SCOPE OF GRAND JURY MATERIAL THAT MAY BE DISSEMINATED OUTSIDE THE GRAND JURY WAS EXPANDED TO INCLUDE BROAD CATEGORIES OF FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE INFORMATION; THE TERM "FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION" WAS ADDED TO THECATEGORIES OF INFORMATION THAT MAY NOW BE DISCLOSED FROM A GRAND JURY TO OTHER GOVT AGENCIES FOR OFFICIAL PURPOSES |
|
|
ARTICULATE THAT POST-9/11 CHANGES ANNOUNCED IN THE PATRIOT ACT ENHANCED THE GOVERNMENTS ABILITY TO SHARE INFORMATION OBTAINEDBY T-III OPERATIONS THAT RELATES TO COUNTERING TERRORISM AND OTHER NATIONAL SECURITY THREATS TO THE UNITED STATES |
CHANGES TO T-III RULES
|
|
|
ARTICULATE THAT POST-9/11, THE PATRIOT ACT EASED THE STANDARD FOR OBTAINING A WARRANT UNDER THE FISA BY CHANGING THE STANDARD FOR OBTAINING A WARRANT FROM THE "PRIMARY PURPOSE" TO "A SIGNIFICANT PURPOSE" OF COLLECTING FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION |
CHANGES TO FISA RULES:STANDARDS FOR FISA COLLECTION, FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE/ COUNTER INTELLIGENCE MUST BE A "SIGNIFICANT" PURPOSE IN ORDER TO START COLLECTING (NO LONGER THE "PRIMARY PURPOSE") - STANDARDS ARE EASED |
|
|
ARTICULATE THAT POST-9/11, THE PATRIOT ACT ELIMINATED THE CONCEPT KNOWN AS "THE WALL" AS IT EXISTED PRIOR TO 9/11 BETWEEN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY DIVISION OF THE FBI |
|
|
|
DESCRIBE THE SCOPE OF THE ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES THAT THE HOMELAND SECURITY ACT OF 2002 GRANTED TO THE DIRECTOR OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
|
|
|
IDENTIFY THAT THE INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT OF 2004 AMENDED THE DEFINITIONS OF THE TERMS "NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE" AND "INTELLIGENCE RELATED TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY" SO THAT THEY NOW REFER TO INFORMATION COLLECTED BY DEA AND OTHER LEA'S |
|
|
|
IDENTIFY THAT IN THE INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT OF 2004, CONGRESS ADOPTED AN UNUSUAL APPROACH OF AUTHORIZING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (DNI) TO DRAFT GUIDELINES LIMITING THE INFORMATION SHARING AUTHORITY REQUIRED BY THIS ACT |
|
|
|
IDENTIFY THE KINDS OF INFORMATION HELD BY ANY AGENCY OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT THE NEW DEFINITION OF "TERRORISM INFORMATION" REQUIRES TO BE SHARED WITH THE DNI |
|
|
|
IDENTIFY THAT THE 2008 ATTORNEY GENERAL GUIDELINES COMBINE PREVIOUSLY CLASSIFIED AND UNCLASSIFIED GUIDELINES INTO ONE SET OF UNCLASSIFIED GUIDELINES DESIGNATING THE FBI AS THE LEAD AGENCY FOR INVESTIGATING DOMESTIC INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST THREATS |
|
|
|
IDENTIFY THAT THE 2008 ATTORNEY GENERAL GUIDELINES SPECIFY THAT THE FBI HAS AUTHORITY TO DETECT, OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT, AND PREVENT AND PROTECT AGAINST THREATS TO NATIONAL SECURITY |
|
|
|
IDENTIFY THAT THE PROTECT AMERICA ACT OF 2007 AND FISA AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2008 REAUTHORIZED POST-9/11 AMENDMENTS CONCERNING FISA
|
|
