• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/6

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

6 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Dipboye et al. (2012)

Unstructured interviews good for measure personality; have loose format that encourages unrehearsed responses; difficult to fake personality in interview

Morgeson et al. (2007)

Interviews have highest corrected validities with agreeableness and emotional stability, even greater than self-report

Mount et al. (1994)

observer ratings of personality are valid (average predicting performance was .30); validity of personality measures based on self-report may underestimate true validity of personality constructs. customer ratings of agreeableness most valid,




Validities differ according to observer (Funder, 1995)

Connelly & Ones (2000)

observer ratings are strong for academic achievement and job performance; incremental variance above self-report. some traits (e.g., neuroticism) need to be interpersonally intimate to rate.

McDaniel et al. (2007)

behavioral tendency SJTs measure personality and have substantial incremental validity above self-report

Hooper et al. (2006)

behavioral tendency SJTs vulnerable to faking, validity drops under faking