• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/59

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

59 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back


Natural Law

Originally equated with God


Now considered rights

Criticism of Natural Law/Rights

Partly due to the development of the Enlightenment and its critical treatment of religious tradition

Natural Law vs Positive Law

Natural Law exists as a fact of nature is something that humans discover


Positive law only exists because humans have posited/ proposed it- man made

Universal human rights

They apply everywhere, to all human beings

Inalienable human rights

They cannot be removed from you; even you cannot give them away

Inherent human rights

No one gave them to you; they belong to you as part of the nature of being a human being

Absolutist Control

Absolute government that has absolute/ unlimited authority and thus is subject to no limits on what it may do, including what it may do to the people it governs

Imprescriptible

Unable to made invalid or unenforceable

Moral autonomy

Is to take decisions for oneself with respect to questions of right and wrong

Edmund Burke- critic of natural/ humans rights

Thought the idea of natural rights was dangerous because as abstract concepts not anchored in the history and traditions of a particular society, the imposition of natural rights was likely to break down the bonds that tie a society together and result in chaos

Jeremy Bentham- critic of natural/ human rights

Argued against the idea of natural rights by rejecting the idea that there could be any law or rights outside of, or prior to, human-made positive law

Karl Marx- critic of natural/ human rights

Dismissed idea of natural rights by arguing that the real function of natural rights in society was to protect the property of the Bourgeoisie class

Typology

A classification of phenomena into a system of types


Important in the study of human rights because they provide useful common vocabulary that is understood by people who study and practice human rights

3 generation of rights

This typology highlights the historical chronology of when people started talking about certain types of rights as natural or human rights

Controversy of 3 generation of rights

Some people do not like this typology because it may appear to contradict the claim that human rights are "indivisible", interdependent and interrelated

First generation/Civil and Political Rights

Other terms closely associated with this category of rights, physical integrity rights and empowerment rights

Second generation/ Economic, Social, Cultural Rights

Welfare rights- which include the right to education, work, adequate standard of living and medical care

The Collective Conception

1st conception of group rights


Treats the group as a collection of distinct individuals, each of whom and only each of whom has moral standing

The Corporate Conception

2nd conception of group rights


Treats the group as monolithic or as one corpus/body. As such the group is treated as having moral standing

Negative and Positive Rights

This typology draws attention to what governments have to do for you to enjoy a right


Ex. In order to enjoy access to healthcare, government must make it affordable to you

Positive right

You must be able to do or enjoy something

Negative right

You must not experience or suffer from something

Controversy of Negative/ Positive Rights

Equate negative rights with civil and political rights and positive rights with economic, social and cultural rights

The Indivisibility of Human Rights- Langlois

Is intended to respond to this attack on the legitimacy of economic, social and culture rights as human rights

Key point about negative/positive rights typology

It does not divide all human rights into distinct categories once and for all rather this terminology allows us to frame different rights according to what the state would be required to do in order for the right to be enjoyed..

Legal and Moral Rights

You might invoke the language of this typology when asked why you think you have a certain right


You might say that you have the right because the right is defined in and protected by law

Controversy of legal and moral Rights

One key question to this typology gives rise concerns whether legal and moral rights or only legal rights should be considered real rights

International Law

Regulates the international community of states and primary legal persons which this law regulates are states( Canada, Nigeria etc.)

Sovereignty

Authority to override all other authorities

When international law is impossible

Only impossible if we insist that this law be binding on States in the same way that domestic law is binding on within States

Treaties( regular kind)

1. Such treaties are more concerned with the effect that what State A does has on Stage B than they are with the effect of what State A does on its own citizens


2. In the event that one of those countries fails to fulfil its obligations under the treaty, it makes sense for the other country to punish the violating country by not keeping up their obligation under the treaty

Human rights treaties

1. Human rights treaties are more concerned with the effect that State A's actions have on the citizens of State A than any effect that State A's behavior might have on State B


2. In the event that one of these states fails to fulfil its obligations under the treaty, it does not make sense for the other country to punish it by not keeping up its obligations under the treaty

Charter Body

Institution that was created by means of the text of the UN charter

UN Charter

A treaty that basically serves as the constitution of the UN

Treaty body

Refers to an institution that was created through the text of the treaty that this body serves to monitor

Human rights and discrimination

One complementary relationship between religion and human rights is that it is standard practice to include religion in the lists of prohibited grounds of discrimination in human rights treaties and human rights codes

The rights to freedom of religion

1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom though, conscience and religion


2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair her freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief of her choice


3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law


4. The States Parties to the present convenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions

Religion- Fazaeli

"Transcendent experience". Transcendent, in this sense refers to that which extends or lies beyond the limits of ordinary experience

Religion and the Origins of Human Rights

A special feature of the relationship between religion and human rights as Fazaeli indicates is that they often share the same philosophical currents, often addressing the same key concepts like justice equality and dignity

Secularization

Non religious

Secularization and Freedom of Religion

Non religious not understanding the need for freedom of religion may create conflict

SOGI Rights

Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Human Rights

International efforts by SOGI activists

-No single direction for the influence emanating out of the United States


-The struggle between American actors concerning the status of SOGI Rights is often played out through surrogates in the Global South

Critiques of efforts to advance SOGI Rights

1. Concerns about whether efforts of the governments and NGOs in the Global North to advance these rights in the Global South should be rejected as a form of Cultural Imperialism


2&3 concern whether it might be a mistake for these activists to try and advance their members interests by seeking human right at all

Case Study- Uganda

Brings together issues concerning the influence of Global North actors in the Global South, the role of religion,the apparent conflict etc.

Political democracy

Democratic political institutions generally refer to the minimalist concept of democracy advocated by scholars such as Schumpeter

Democracy

Political system which possesses sufficient amount of participation and opposition- Dahl

Opposition

Refers to the extent of the governments tolerance for competing policy preferences

3 aspects of democratic political institutions

A democracy is more likely to place greater contraints on its political leaders


A democracy is more likely to involve more its citizens in the selection of its leadership


A democracy is more likely to have diverse political parties as well as highly competitive elections

State Repression

Persecution of an individual or group usually for political reasons, particularly for the purpose of restricting or preventing their ability to take part in the political life of society


Often the product of Exclusionary Ideologies

Personal integrity

Individuals can go about their daily lives free from arbitrary incursions carried out by the State ( detentions, torture etc.)

Rational Decision Making

Incentive behind State Repression


Involves weighing the marginal benefit and marginal cost of any activity

Exclusionary Ideologies

Ideology behind State Repression


Define the conditions under which it is acceptable to target or exclude certain categories of people

2 Variables that Diminish Human Rights Violations

Democracy and economic development diminish something

Democracy's influence on State Repression

Cost-benefit analysis


Democratic values


Regulation of behavior


(Influencers)

First wave scholarship

Found a linear relationship: the more democracy the less repression

Second wave scholarship

Agreed that democracy had a significant influence on repression, but challenged the linear movement on this relationship

The More Murder in the Middle Hypothesis

Hypothesis


Full autocracies and democracies apply relatively low amounts of repression

Democratic Threshold model

Not all movements to democracy are comparable and it is only when a certain threshold is passed that we should expect an influence