• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/66

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

66 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
taphonomy
the study of how fossils come to be the way they are
law of superposition
older sediments are usually lower
biostratgraphy
using plant and animal fossils to date a layer
paleomagnetism
read the orientation of the ferrous particles in the dirt around the fossil to find if any flip in the earth's magnetic poles had occurred
absolute dating
chronometric
fill the time between 1.25 by and 40 ky
dendrochronology
use tree rings to date things
K-Ar
some potassium has an extra neutron and decomposes into argon
argon gas commonly gets trapped in igneous rocks
during eruptions, the argon gas escapes, but the potassium is still there, so the clock is restarted
what species is it
lumper = there are variations in the species vs. difference in time of fossil record
plesiadapiforms
paleocene era
early primate-like mammals
possibly grasping hands and feet, arboreal
diastema
no post-orbital bar or closure
claws, not nails
diastema
gap in teeth row, usually found in rodents
also found in plesiadapiforms
nocturnal visual predation idea
primate evolution theory
forward facing eyes, nails, grasping hands and feet for cautiously sneaking along branches to grab insects
but squirrels don't have grasping hands of stereoscopic vision
but nocturnal insect hunting is common among small-bodied primates
angiosperm coevolution
primate evolution theory
angiosperms produce fruits and flowers
grasping hands would be useful for feeing on fruit on terminal branches
but gray squirrels forage there just as much as other monkeys
narrow niche
primate evolution theory
they lost other behaviors that caused them to differentiate
gray squirrels differ from Tamarin monkeys in that monkeys don't go on the ground?
Proconsul
Miocene era
21-14 mya
No tail, Y5 molar pattern, diastema for huge canines
Sahelanthropus tchadodensis
brain size 360cc (chimps 380, humans 1350)
huge brow ridge

Bipedal
small canines(but not human-like yet)
tiny sagittal crest
foramen magnum
foramen magnum
a big hole that the spinal cord goes through
45 degrees in chimps
90 degreed in chad
120 degrees in humans
adapids, omomyids
Eocene era
first true primates
Post-orbital bar
nails
steroscopic vision
grasping hands and feet
Orrorin tugenesis
Kenya
6.1-5.8

bipedal
femur thickness
femur thickness
all the weight from the upper body is transmitted through the hip into the upper femur
in response to mechanical stress, top of neck is thin, and bottom of neck is thick
shown in Orrorin
used to claim autrolopithecus is like humans, although it's so mineralized a lot of detail is lost
hominin
anything on the branch including humans that diverge from the most recent common ancestor of bonobos and chimps

brain size, bipedalism, small canines, no sagittal crest, stone tools, fire, art, culture
Ardipithecus Kadabba
5.8-5.2
Ethiopia
bipedal?
ape-like canines (smaller, but still pointy)
Ardipithecus ramidus
hundreds were found last fall
Ethiopia
5.8?-4.4

molars suggest more than ripe fruit
bipedal

small brain (325)
smaller canines, though still pointy
feet are ape-like with divergent big toe
Ardipithecus ramidus is bipedal
hands and arms suggest not a knuckle walker
pelvis makes bipedalism almost certain: blades of pelvis out and to the side, pulls the inner muscles around the side of the trunk
ilium is wide and low like other hominins

hamstring attachment(butt bone) is on the side like chimps, not behind hip joint like in humans
upper part is like humans, lower part is like chimps
Savannah theory
theory for bipedalism
toward the end of the miocene, forests were disappearing, the climate was cooling
hominins took advantage of the increase in savanna
traveling by foot was more efficient
Austrolopithecus anamensis
4.2-3.9
Ethiopia, kenya
Bipedal: tibia top has big expansion of bone, longer triangle, ankle joint oriented horizontally
small, but pointy canines
low-quality diet specialist?
Austrolopithecus
increase in molar size
australopithecus afarensis
Chad, Tanzania(Laetoli), Ethiopia(Hadar), Kenya(West Turkana)
3.7-3.0: a long time (3x as long as us, 0.2)
projecting face

433 cc, bigger than chimps for the first time, but not by much
big molars, small canines (for the first time), curved tooth row, thick enamel
looks like normal walking as opposed to crouched
knees have carrying angle
femurs bends into feet, directly under hip

Laetoli footprints
Lucy
Dikika
Laetoli footprints
3.7 mya
ash from volcano was wet and muddy, preserved small and big footprints
foot was like ours, big toe next to others, though arch wasn't as good
Lucy
Austrolopithecus afarensis
small adult, all the teeth in, no evidence for language
clearly bipedal: hip blade wraps around, brings gluteus medius around hip to support joint while walking
intermembral index is 85 (70 for humans, 108 for chimps): probably uses trees a fair amount
Dikika skeleton
scapula in between being at side like humans and upward like chimps
dentin
the tooth center, not as strong as enamel
Keynathropus platyops
Kenya
3.5-3.2
Flat face
small molars
Fragemented: afarensis?
Underground holes sometimes upon up and trap mammals, mineral-rich -> good fossils
Australopithecus africanus
South Africa
sites Makapansgat, Sterkfontain, Taung
3.2-2.5
Bipedal
451 cc
BIG molars, small canines
postcrania similar to afarensis
big toe in line with others

wide ilium
Australopithecus sediba
recently discovered
1.9 mya
South Africa(Malapa)
similar to Africanus, but some cranial and pelvic traits are similar to homo
Australopithecus garhi
a surprise
Ethiopia
2.5
450 cc
large molars, but different from afarensis
associated with cut marks on bones: scavenging and hunting?
diet and foraging is at the transition between austro and homo
Austrolopithecus aethiopicus
Kenya
2.5
Robust: huge molars(4x), sagittal crest, zygomatic arch, masseter muscle
zygomatic arch
the cheekbone which houses the masseter muscle
size is due to stress from temporalis muscle(chewing muscle) at top
Wolfe's Law
the bone responds to mechanical stress
australopithecus boisei
Kenya(East and West Turkana), Tanzania(Olduvai Gorge), Ethiopia (Omo)
2.4-1.4
465 cc
Robust: huge molars(4x), sagittal crest, zygomatic arch, masseter muscle
Huge jaw and face
looks like other austrolopitheci from the neck down
Robust australopithecines
large face and jaw
so robust, it's unlikely it gave rise to us
Australopithecus robustus
2.0-1.4
South Africa: Swartkraans, Krombaii
476 cc
robust face and dentition
slight weight dimorphism
loridosis
the spine is s-shaped
shock absorber, pulls body over hips
Homo Habilus
1.6-2.0
Kenya, Tanzania(Olduvai)
Leakey: first in the Homo genus
Oldowan tools: stone, for hunting?
612 cc
Smaller molars than australopithecus(diet is shifting, everything about physical interaction is changing)
Postcrania: short 4 inches
Long arms
FLK butchery site
Olduvai Gorge
Super important
A. Boisei and H. Habilus
FLK butchery site
As the Earth get pulled apart in the Serengeti, you see more fossils
FLK butchery site
Olduvai
earliest rock-solid evidence of meat-eating
they they even more prime wildebeests than lions
hunting, not scavenging
Homo genus
brain size bigger than 600 cc
smaller teeth
stone tools
Homo Redolfensis
1.6-2.4
Could be habilus with small women and big men
753 cc
Flat face

Larger molars than habilus
Homo Erectus
0.4-1.8
Africa, China, Indonesia, Republic of Georgia(Dmanisi)
970 cc
Similar size to humans, a bit larger
Similar postcrania to modern humans
Acheulian industry (1.5 mya)
Tools are tear-shaped, hard to make

Went everywhere except Europe
Pushed into extinction by Heidelbergensis about 50kya
Transverse torus
insertion mark in back of skull for neck muscle attachment
H. Erectus
post-orbital constriction
behind eyes, hindered development of frontal and temporal lobes
H. Erectus
Homo erectus cranial morphology
Long, low cranium
Big brow ridges
Transverse torus
Post-orbital constriction
Teeth are only slightly larger than normal humans'
Homo erectus is more than one species?
African: H. ergaster
Asian: homo erectus
Dmanisi
H. Erectus
In republic of Georgia
1.8 mya, there was a volcanic eruption
The river valley was flooded with lava
Fossils found on the side of the river
evidence of butcher
Expensive tissue hypothesis
theory for bigger brains
hunting for meat is a complex behavior that provides high-quality food
with a better quality diet, we could cut down on guts and stomach, which were big energy users
then we focused energy on brain

why: hunting requires planning, social interaction; selection pressure for bigger brain
fire
not used until 800 kya
Turkana Boy
Homo erectus
6' tall, 60 kg
long legs
narrow pelvis
large leg joints
foot arch(from other specimens)
evolved for endurance running?
Homo Florensiensis
Island of Flores, Indonesia
95-125 kya
Tiny, 3.5 feet tall
Tools are similar to Erectus, but no handaxes
Island dwarfism
possible theory for florensiensis
the island is closed and restrictive
favors tinier and tinier animals
Homo heidelbergensis
Europe, Africa, Asia
Atapuerca(Spain), Bodo(Ethiopia)
1 mya-200 kya
1206 cc, around humans
Postcrania similar to humans, tall, powerfully built
Levallois tradition
hunting, fire
Atapuerca
Oldest hominins in Western Europe
Heidelbergensis
Sima del elefante: 1.1 mya
Gran Dolina: 800 kya
Middle Pleistocene
126-781 kya
Gran Dolina
800 kya
H. heidelbergensis
hyoid bone: holds bone up, snaps when strangled, very delicate
Heidelbergensis culture
Strong evidence of hunting: butchered horses, rhinoceri, other animals
Schoningen spears: 6 feet, first time in preserved fossil record
Levallois: prepared core
fire: cooking
central place foraging: rock shelter, probably start of division of labor
Homo neanderthalensis
Europe, Middle East
Neandertal(Germany), La Chapelle(France), Shanidar(Iraq), Kebara (Israel)
130-28 kya
Mousterian technique
First burials
Speech wasn't human-like due to pallet
Homo sapiens
200 kya-
Omo(Ethiopia), Klasies and Border(S. Africa)
Culture doesn't develop until 50 kya
see chart
admixture
throwing different gene pools together