Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
132 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
challenges facing motivating employees today
|
1. revised employment relationship
-globalization, technology, restructuring -undermines trust & commitment 2. flatter organizations (fewer supervisors to monitor employee performance) 3. changing workforce (Gen X, Y bring different expectations) |
|
3 objectives of Maslow's Hierarchy
|
1. holistic
2. humanistic 3. positivistic |
|
holistic
|
integrative view of needs, rather than thinking about each one separately from the others
|
|
humanistic
|
responses to higher needs are influenced by social dynamics, not just instinct
|
|
positivistic
|
need gratification is just as important as need deprivation
|
|
Maslow's Hierarchy (pyramid)--in order from base to peak
|
-physiological
-safety -belongingness -esteem -self-actualization |
|
Four Drive Theory
|
Drive to:
-Acquire -Bond -Learn -Defend |
|
Drive to Acquire
|
need to take/keep objects and experiences; basis of hierarchy and status
|
|
Drive to Bond
|
need to form relationships/social commitments; basis of social identity
|
|
Drive to Learn
|
need to satisfy curiosity and resolve conflicting information; basis of self-actualization
|
|
Drive to Defend
|
need to protect ourselves; a reactive drive (not proactive); basis of fight or flight
|
|
why is self-actualization a growth need?
|
because once it is satisfied, people desire more, not less, of it
|
|
features of the Four Drives Theory
|
-innate and hardwired: everyone has them
-independent of each other (no hierarchy) -complete set--none are excluded from model |
|
how Four Drives affect needs
|
1. they determine which emotions are tagged to incoming information
2. drives generate independent, and often competing, emotions that demand our attention 3. social skill set determines how to translate drives into needs and effort |
|
Learned Needs Theory
|
need for:
-achievement -affiliation -power |
|
need for achievement
|
desire for challenging/risky goals, feedback, recognition
|
|
need for affiliation
|
desire to seek approval, conform, avoid conflict
|
|
need for power
|
desire to control one's environment; personal vs. socialized power
|
|
implications for needs/drives theories
|
Four Drive
-balanced opportunity for employees to fulfill drives -employees continually seek fulfillment or drives -avoid having conditions support one drive over others Maslow -allow employees to self-actualize -power of positive experiences Offer employees a choice of rewards |
|
increase E-to-P expectancy
|
-train employees
-select people with required competencies -provide role clarification, sufficient resources, coaching feedback |
|
increase P-to-O expectancy
|
-measure performance accurately
-describe outcomes of good and bad performance -explain how rewards are linked to past performance |
|
increase outcome valences
|
-ensure that rewards are valued
-individualize rewards -minimize countervalent outcomes |
|
effective goal setting
|
-specific
-relevant -commitment -challenging -participation -feedback |
|
characteristics of effective feedback
|
-specific
-credible -relevant -sufficiently frequent -timely |
|
nonsocial feedback
|
gauges, printouts
-better for goal progress -more accurate, less damaging |
|
social feedback
|
supervisors, coworkers
-better for "good news" feedback -improves self-image, esteem |
|
elements of equity theory
|
-input/output ratio
-comparison other -equity assessment (overreward/underreward) |
|
procedural justice structural rules
|
-voice
-bias-free -listens to all -knowledgeable -appealable -consistent |
|
4 types of rewards
|
1. Membership/seniority
2. Job status 3. Competencies 4. Performance-based |
|
membership/seniority
|
fixed wages, seniority increases
ADVANTAGES: -guaranteed wages: attractive to job applicants -seniority-based rewards reduce turnover DISADVANTAGES: -doesn't motivate job performance -discourages poor performers from leaving -may act as golden handcuffs |
|
job status
|
includes job evaluation and status perks
ADVANTAGES: -job evals try to maintain pay equity -motivates competition for promotions DISADVANTAGES: -employees exaggerate duties, hoard resources -focuses employees on own jobs, not customers -inconsistent with workplace flexibility |
|
competency-based
|
-pay increases with competencies acquired and demonstrated
-more flexible workforce, better quality, consistent w/ employability... ...but potentially subjective, higher training costs |
|
ways to improve reward effectiveness
|
-link rewards to performance
-ensure rewards are relevant -team rewards for interdependent jobs -ensure rewards are valued (watch out for unintended consequences) |
|
job specialization
|
dividing work into separate jobs that include a subset of the tasks required to complete the product/service
|
|
advantages/disadvantages to job specialization
|
A:
less time-changing activities lower training costs job mastered quickly -better person-job matching D: boredom discontentment pay higher costs lower quality/motivation |
|
job rotation
|
moving from one job to another
-minimizes repetitive strain/injury -multi-skills the workforce -potentially reduces job boredom |
|
job enlargement
|
adding tasks to an existing job
|
|
job enrichment
|
given more responsibility for scheduling, coordinating, and planning one's own work
-clustering tasks into natural groups (interdependent tasks in one job) -establishing client relationship (responsible for specific clients and contacting them directly) |
|
dimensions of self-empowerment
|
1. self-determination
2. meaning 3. competence 4. impact |
|
self-determination
|
employees feel they have freedom, discretion
|
|
meaning
|
employees believe their work is important
|
|
competence
|
employees have a sense of self-efficacy
|
|
impact
|
employees feel their actions influence others
|
|
self-leadership
|
the process of influencing onself to establish the self-direction and self-motivation to perform a task
|
|
5 elements of self-leadership
|
1. personal goal-setting
2. constructive thought patterns 3. designing natural rewards 4. self-monitoring 5. self-reinforcement |
|
8 types of influence
|
1. silent authority
2. assertiveness 3. exchange 4. coalition formation 5. upward appeal 6. ingratiation/impression mgmt. 7. persuasion 8. information control |
|
soft influence tactics
|
-persuasion
-exchange -ingratiation/impression mgmt. generally more preferred/acceptable |
|
hard influence tactics
|
-assertiveness
-silent authority -coalition formation -information control -upward appeal |
|
silent authority
|
following requests without overt influence
key words: legitimate power, high power distance culture |
|
assertiveness
|
actively applying legitimate/coercive power via reminding, confronting, threatening
|
|
exchange
|
promising/reminding past benefits in exchange for compliance
key words: negotiation, networking ("There is a long and proud history of mutual back-scratching between cops and private dicks.") |
|
coalition formation
|
a group forms to gain more power than individuals alone
1. pools resources 2. legitimizes issue 3. power through social identity |
|
upward appeal
|
appealing to higher authority and firm's goals; alliance with higher status person
|
|
ingratiation
impression management |
increase similarity to target through flattery
actively shaping our public images |
|
persuasion
|
using logic, facts, emotional appeal to gain acceptance (always depends on the leader, but in this case, is probably a referent one)
|
|
information control
|
manipulating other's access to information (censorship, withholding, filtering)
|
|
power
|
the capacity of a person/team/organization to influence others
|
|
5 sources of power
|
1. legitimate
2. reward 3. coercive 4. expert 5. referent |
|
legitimate power
|
agreement that people in certain roles can request certain behaviors of others (range is higher in high power distance cultures)
|
|
reward power
|
ability to control the allocation of rewards valued by others
upward/downward |
|
coercive
|
ability to apply punishment (i.e. peer pressure)
upward/downward |
|
expert power
|
individual's or work unit's capacity to influence others by posessing knowledge or skills they value
knowledge economy: employees gaining expert power over companies |
|
referent power
|
occurs when others identify with, like, and otherwise respect the person (charismatic leadership)
|
|
control over information flow
|
legitimate power
-common in centralized structures -relates to formal communication network |
|
coping with uncertainty
|
those who know how to cope with organizational uncertainties gain power
1. prevention 2. forecasting 3. absorption |
|
4 contingencies of power
|
things that moderate power
1. substitutability 2. centrality 3. discretion 4. visibility |
|
how to increase nonsubstitutability
|
control labor, tasks, knowledge; differentiation
|
|
networking
|
cultivating social relationships to achieve one's goals; increase power via
-social capital -referent power -visibility |
|
influence
|
any behavior that attempts to alter the behavior of others
|
|
organizational politics
|
behaviors that others perceive as self-serving tactics for personal gain at the expense of other people or the organization
|
|
reasons why organizational politics exists
|
1. tolerance of politics
2. scarce resources 3. organizational change 4. complex/ambiguous decisions |
|
6 ways to minimize political behavior
|
1. introduce clear rules
2. leaders as role models 3. manage change effectively 4. manage team norms 5. support values that oppose politics 6. free-flowing information |
|
conflict
|
the process in which one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party
|
|
constructive (task-related) conflict
|
-focuses on the issue, not parties
-recognize problems, solutions -can be valuable/healthy |
|
socioemotional (relationship) conflict
|
-personal attack
-perceptual biases -distorts information processing |
|
minimize socioemotional conflict by...
|
1. emotional intelligence
2. cohesive team 3. supportive team norms |
|
sources of conflict
|
1. incompatible goals
2. differentiation 3. task interdependence 4. scarce resources 5. ambiguous rules 6. communication problems |
|
problem solving
|
-best bc it seeks optimal outcome
-doesn't work when two parties are completely opposed -difficult without trust, openness |
|
avoiding
|
*for high socioemotional conflict...but may produce long-term frustration
|
|
yielding
|
-imbalance of power
-issue isn't equally important ...but may create higher future expectations |
|
forcing
|
*when you know you're right and you need to fix things quickly
...but fuels socioemotional conflict |
|
compromising
|
-best with little hope for mutual gain, equal power, and need of a quick soln
...but may overlook a better soln in favor of "good enough" |
|
situational influences on negotiation
|
-location/physical setting
-time passage and deadlines -audience |
|
effective negotiation behavior
|
-preparation and goal-setting
-gathering information -effective communication -making concessions |
|
leadership
|
the ability to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness of the organizations of which they are members
|
|
5 leadership perspectives
|
1. transformational
2. implicit 3. competency 4. behavioral 5. contingency |
|
7 leadership competencies
|
1. emotional intelligence
2. integrity*** 3. drive 4. leadership motivation 5. self-confidence 6. intelligence 7. knowledge of the business |
|
limitations of the 7 leadership competencies
|
-implies universality
-subjective -other combinations may work -potential for leadership, not actual leadership |
|
path-goal leadership styles
|
-directive
-supportive -participative -achievement-oriented |
|
leader effectiveness
|
-employee motivation
-employee satisfaction -leader acceptance |
|
situational leadership model
|
-leaders vary style with follower "readiness"
-styles: telling, selling, participating, delegating |
|
Fiedler's contingency model
|
-style based on personality
-depends on situational control |
|
transformational leaders
|
change organization to fit environment
charisma? circular logic, cross-cultural differences |
|
transactional leaders
|
link job performance to rewards, ensure employees have necessary resources, apply contingency leadership
|
|
in four words, transformational leaders...
|
create, communicate, model, build commitment
|
|
implicit model
|
attributing leadersihp
stereotyping leadership need for situational control |
|
communication
|
the process by which information is transmitted and understood between 2 or more people, and that the sender's original meaning remains intact
|
|
4 functions of communication
|
1. fulfill need to bond
2. communicate work activities 3. knowledge management 4. decision making |
|
emotional contagion
|
the automatic process of sharing another person's emotions by mimicking their facial expressions and other nonverbal behavior
|
|
purposes of emotional contagion
|
1. provide continuous feedback
2. increase emotional understanding 3. create collective sentiment |
|
communication barriers
|
1. filtering
2. language (jargon, ambiguity) 3. information overload 4. perceptions |
|
how to reduce information overload
|
1. increase your processing of workload
-read faster -remove distractions -time management 2. decrease information load -buffering -omitting -summarizing |
|
how to effectively get a message across
|
-repeat message
-use timing effectively -be descriptive -empathize |
|
active listening process
|
sensing, evaluation, responding
|
|
communicating in hierarchies
|
-work space design
-e-zines, blogs, wikis -employee surveys -direct communication w/ mgmt |
|
grapevine benefits/limitations
|
BENEFITS:
-fills in missing information -strengthens corporate culture -relieves anxiety -signals that problems exist LIMITATIONS -distortions might increase anxiety -perceived lack of concern for employees |
|
what do influence tactics depend on?
|
-organizational position
-influencer's power base -cross-cultural expectations -age cohort |
|
why is integrity called "authentic leadership"?
|
-individual acts with sincerity
-has a higher moral capacity to judge dilemmas and apparently 73% of CEOs can't be trusted! |
|
why are teams better than an individual under the right circumstances?
|
-make better decisions
-make a better product because of increased experience/expertise -increase employee engagement |
|
task characteristics
|
1. cleary, easy to implement
2. shares common inputs, processes, outputs 3. interdependence |
|
3 levels of task interdependence
|
1. reciprocal (highest)
2. sequential 3. pooled |
|
3 aspects of team composition
|
1. motivation (to perform task and to work as a team)
2. competencies (skills/knowledge to get the job done and to work as a team) 3. homo/heterogeneous depending on the task |
|
characteristics of homogeneous teams
|
-less conflict
-faster team development -better for cooperative tasks -better coordination -high satisfaction of team members |
|
characteristics of heterogeneous teams
|
-more conflict
-slower team development -better for complex problems -more creative -better representation outside team |
|
stages of team development
|
-forming
-storming -norming -performing -adjourning |
|
team norms and how they are developed
|
informal rules and expectations established by team to regulate member behavior
-initial team experiences -critical events in team's history -experiences/values team members bring |
|
Belbin's Team Role Model
|
-9 team roles all needed for optimal performance
-people choose role based on personality -some roles become important at later stages |
|
team cohesiveness
|
the degree of attraction people feel toward the team and their motivation to remain a member
|
|
6 influences on team cohesiveness
|
-size
-interaction -difficult entry -external challenges -similarity -success |
|
how to minimize social loafing
|
1. make individual performance more visible
-smaller teams -specialize tasks -measure individual performance 2. increase employee motivation -increase job enrichment -select motivated employees |
|
decision making
|
the conscious process of making choices among one or more alternatives
|
|
Rational Choice Decision Process
|
1. identify problem
2. choose best decision process 3. develop alternate solutions 4. choose best alternative 5. implement selected alternative 6. evaluate outcome |
|
problem identification challenges
|
1. stakeholder framing
2. perceptual defense 3. mental modes 4. decisive leadership 5. solution-focused problems |
|
making choices: goals
|
R: clear
OB: ambiguous |
|
making choices: processing
|
R: all
OB: limited |
|
making choices: evaluation timing
|
R: simultaneously
OB: sequentially |
|
making choices: standards
|
R: absolute
OB: implicit favorite |
|
making choices: info quality
|
R: facts
OB: perceptually distorted |
|
making choices: decision objective
|
R: maximization
OB: good enough |
|
escalation of commitment causes
|
1. self-justification
2. prospect theory effect 3. perceptual blinders 4. cost control |
|
employee involvement
|
the degree to which employees influence how their work is organized and carried out
|
|
contingencies of involvement
|
1. Decision Structure (problem is new/complex)
2. Knowledge Source (employees have relevant knowledge beyond leader) 3. Decision Commitment (employees lack commitment unless involved) 4. Risk of Conflict (norms support company goals and agreement is likely) |