• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/14

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

14 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Performance Systems
the systematic description of job-relevant strengths and weaknesses within and between workers
Why Performance Managment & Feedback
Companies that seek competitive advantage through employees must be able to man-age the behavior and results of all employees.
Employees don't like because
lack of consistency of use of performance appraisals across the
inability to differentiate among different performance levels; and the inability of the appraisal system to provide use-ful data for development
Criticism steps not from evaluating employees usually but
Rather, they result from how the performance management system is developed and used.
An important part of appraising performance is to establish employee goals which should be tied
to the company’s strategic goals.
Performance managment defined
The means through which managers ensure that employ-ees’ activities and outputs are congru-ent with the organi-zation’s goals.
Performance Appraisal
The means through which managers ensure that employ-ees’ activities and outputs are congru-ent with the organi-zation’s goals.
Performance Feedback
The process of providing employ-ees information regarding their performance effectiveness.
Identification
-- deciding what criteria will be measured, based on JA
Measurement –
the tools and methods used to judge and evaluate perf.
Managing people –
giving balanced feedback, listening, and coaching
PM How to do it right
Process should align with ER values
Visible senior mgmt support
Have the right measures (quantity and quality)
Link ee goals to business unit and orgzn goals
Have a clear and transparent processes
Give managers training in perf mgmt, giving feedback, and coaching
Take notes and communicate those notes over email after the meeting (i.e. paper trail) – ESPECIALLY if perf is low…
… But realize that you can be purposeful in what you write, vs. what you say
Identify and communicate if the perf mgmt system is suboptimal
Attribute/Traits (Leadership, judgement, creativity)
Pros/cons
Pros: Most popular. Easiest to devlop andare generalziable across jobs, strats, orgs. Can be reliable and valid.

cons: Little congruence between the tecniques and company strategy. Vague performance standars open to different interpretations by different raters. Raters provide extermely diff ratings resulting in lower validy/reliablity.
No feedback on how to correct performance deficencies. Feedback can be defensive.
Behavioral Approach: Define behaviors employee must exhibit to be effective in the job. Mangers asses extent to which employees exhibit behaviors defined
Process should align with ER values
Visible senior mgmt support
Have the right measures (quantity and quality)
Link ee goals to business unit and orgzn goals
Have a clear and transparent processes
Give managers training in perf mgmt, giving feedback, and coaching
Take notes and communicate those notes over email after the meeting (i.e. paper trail) – ESPECIALLY if perf is low…
… But realize that you can be purposeful in what you write, vs. what you say
Identify and communicate if the perf mgmt system is suboptimal