Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
24 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Organizaitons want to ensure that:
Good performers are... Low perfomers are |
Organizations want to ensure that:
Good performers are motivated to stay with the organization Chronically low performers are allowed, encouraged, or if necessary, forced to leave |
|
Note on Separation and Retention
|
Retaining top performers is not always easy, however. Similarly, the increased willingness of people to sue their employer, combined with an unprecedented level of violence in the workplace, has made discharging employees legally complicated and personally dangerous.
� |
|
Turnover Benefits
|
Savings may be achieved by not replacing leaver
Infusion of new skills Vacancy creates opportunity for current Cost Savings for lower priced replacement Replacement by be a better performer Replacement could enchnce diversity Departure may offer opportunity to reorganize |
|
Separation
|
blank
|
|
Seperation
|
Managing Involuntary Turnover
-Turnover initiated by the organizaton Employment-at-will doctrine -- in the absence of a specific contract, either an employer or employee could sever the employment relationship at any time � |
|
Seperation Violence
|
Violence in the workplace caused by involuntary turnover has become a major organizational problem in recent years
A standardized, systematic approach to discipline and discharge is necessary |
|
Terminations are helpful when
|
Managing out poor performers
Setting performance standards Enforcing performance management process Managing company culture Proactively managing employee behavioral issues E.g. employees who steal, harass, or otherwise break the rules and/or contribute to a negative work environment Choosing to do something rather than nothing Opportunities for others Promotion or lateral / developmental openings When doing so can save the company! |
|
Mass Layoffs/Downsizing
The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (WARN Act) |
CALIFORNIA: For example, California requires advance notice for plant closings, layoffs, and relocations of 50 or more employees regardless of percentage of workforce, that is, without the federal "one-third" rule for mass layoffs of fewer than 500 employees. Also, the California law applies to employers with 75 or more employees, counting both full-time and part-time employees.[4]
|
|
Mass Layoffs/Downsizing
|
Plan ahead:
Starts at the top Have a stated reason Have criteria for selection (e.g., performance, seniority) Review the final list for legality (e.g., adverse impact, the “smell test”) Date selection WARN Act, holidays, day of the week Training Notifiers How and where to deliver the message HR Paperwork, calculates severance pay, benefits |
|
Mass layoffs downsising 2
|
Identify the business need for downsizing, and communicate this to employees
D-Day considerations: Pre-notify board members, union Security (e.g., computer access, documents, company property, personal security) Post-Notification: When is the last day worked? Outplacement consultants? Services? (e.g. resume, job hunting, etc.) EAP’s involvement? (employee assistance program) HR’s assistance (e.g., benefits explanation, checkout procedures, removal of personal property, vacation payout, proactively identify problem cases) |
|
Individual Termination
|
For cause - Single incident (e.g., law breaker), sexual harassment
Not for cause – Inability to perform job effectively, new management team, “chemistry” |
|
Summary of Termination
|
Terminations are not fun. But you do have to learn how to do them right
Plan, plan, plan! Gather evidence, and have it on hand Should never be an “off-the-cuff” or “You’re fired!” decision Conduct a thorough investigation and gather sufficient facts before termination decision Execute the plan, but be human Express empathy Preserve dignity Follow through Take notes during the conversation Have resources and phone numbers/websites on hand |
|
Preventing Voluntary Turnover / Job Withdrawa
|
l
HOW TO RETAIN EMPLOYEES THAT ARE WITHDRAWING OR ARE NOT SATISFIED |
|
Allen article "Why we should care" tangibles
|
Tangible
HR Staff time managers time Accrued paid time off Temp coverage |
|
Allen article retention why we should care intangibles
|
Loss of workforce diveristy
diminshed quality while job's unfilled loss of org memory loss of clients competition from quitter if he/she opens new venture contagion-other employees leave teamwork disruption loss of seasoned mentors |
|
Allen why care more. Replacement costs
|
HR staff time, hiring manger time
Recuriting: advertising, agency fees, referessl bonues. slection: selection measure expenses, application expenses Orientation and training pogram time and reosurces formal informal triaing, socialization, productiviity loss |
|
Sources of Job Dissatisfaction: Perosnal Dispostions
|
Negative affectivity = a disposition that reflects pervasive individual differences in satisfaction with any aspect of life
� |
|
Sources of Job Dissasfaction
Supervisors and coworkers |
A person may be satisfied with his or her supervisor and coworkers because of:
Shared values, attitudes, and philosophies Strong social support Many surveys now indicate this is the #1 reason for leaving What can you do? Rearrange reporting or work social structures |
|
Sources of Job Dissasfaction
Pay and Benefits |
For many people, pay is a reflection of self worth, so pay satisfaction takes on critical significance when it comes to retention
What can you do? Meet the market; give spot cash awards, give retention bonuses, non-monetary rewards (e.g., plaque, resort weekend, memberships) |
|
Sources of Job Dissasfaction
Pay and Benefits |
dissatisfied individuals enact a set of behaviors in succession to progressively avoid their work situation
Behavior change (e.g. performance decreases) Psychological job withdraw (e.g. “checked out”) Physical job withdraw (e.g. absenteeism) |
|
Behavior change from dissatisfied EEs
|
blank
|
|
Job Withdrawel
|
Process of Job Withdrawal is a theory that dissatisfied individuals enact a set of behaviors in succession to avoid their work situation (see Figure 10.3).
If the source of dissatisfaction relates to organization wide policies, organizational turnover is likely. |
|
Job Withdrawel
|
Most attempts to measure job satisfaction rely on workers' self-reports. For example, the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) emphasizes various facets of satisfaction: pay, the work itself, supervision, co‑workers, and promotions (text Table 10.5). Also engaging in an ongoing program of employee satisfaction provides a means of empirically assessing the impact of changes in policy (text Figure 10.5).
� |
|
WHAT MANAGERS CAN DO TO PREVENT UNWANTED TURNOVER
] |
answers on printout
|