• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/38

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

38 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
3 elements of total compensation
base compensation
pay incentives
indirect compensation/ benefits
Fair labor standards act
covers non exempt employees
$7.25 per hour min wage
Overtime- Time & a half anything over 40 hours per week
Exempt employees from the fair labor standards act
Professional
Adminstrative
executive
outside sales
not covered by FLSA

paid by salary
Living wage- pros
right thing to do
decreases amount of govt assistance
Reverse teh downward trend in wages for low-wage workers
Living wage -cons
artifically fixing a price for labor above the market price.. cause decrease in demand
Leads to higher unemployment
Not an appropriate role of government
Eaqual pay act of 1963
Men & women must be paid teh same for "equal jobs"

skill
effort
responsibility
working conditions

it is acceptabel to pay differently based on seniority, merit, quantity/ quality differences or any other differential not related to sex`
Criteria for Compensation Plans
Job vs. Individual
Performance vs. Membership
Fixed vs. Variable
Internal vs. External Equity
Open vs. Secret
Centralization vs. Decentralization of Pay
Decisions
Job vs. Individual
Will compensation be based on how
the company values a particular job or will it be based on
how much skill and knowledge an employee brings to that
job?
Performance vs. Membership
Will compensation
emphasize performance and tie pay to individual or group
contributions, or will it emphasize membership in the
organization – logging in a prescribed number of hours
each week and progressing up the organization ladder?
Fixed vs. Variable
Will compensation be paid monthly
on a fixed basis or will it fluctuate depending on
preestablished criteria such as performance or company
profits?
Internal vs. External Equity
Will the
compensation plan be perceived as fair within the
company, or will it be perceived as fair relative to what
other employers are paying for the same type of
labor?
Open vs. Secret
Will employees have access to
information about other workers’ compensation levels
and how compensation decisions are made or will this
knowledge be withheld from employees?
Centralization vs. Decentralization of Pay
Decisions
Will compensation decisions be made
in a tightly controlled central location, or will they be
delegated to managers of the firm’s units?
Job based pay if
Employees do not need to cover for each other
• Significant training requirements
• Employees move up
• Standardized jobs within industry
Individual-based pay if
• Relatively educated workforce
• Technology and organizational structure change
• Employee participation and teamwork
• No upward mobility but skill-development opportunities
available
• Significant effect of turnover/absenteeism on lost
production
How do you determine the pay for a
particular job?
• Job analysis
• Comparison with other jobs within the company -
internal equity
• Point system
• Comparison with other jobs outside the company
– external equity
• Compensation survey
3 Assumptions of Pay for Performance/Incentive
Systems
• Real differences in performance exit between
individuals/teams/plants.
• Firm’s success is dependent on
individual/team/plant performance.
• Rewards are an important motivational tool.
Pay-for-Performance Programs Unit of Analysis Microlevel
Individual
Merit pay
Bonuses
Awards
Piece rate
Team
Bonuses
Awards
Pay-for-Performance Programs Unit of Analysis
Macrolevel
Business Unit/Plant
Gainsharing
Bonuses
Awards
Organization
Profit sharing
Stock plans
Individual-Based Plans
• Contributions accurately isolated
• Job demands autonomy
• Cooperation isn’t critical or competition is
encouraged
Challenges in Implementation
Team-Based Plans
• Interdependent work tasks
• Organization consistent with team-based
incentives
• Foster entrepreneurship in self-managed work
groups
Plant-Wide Plans Succeed
• Small to midsize plants
• Technology limits improvements in efficiency
• Consider comparative performance if multiple
plants/location
• No traditional hierarchy of authority
• Product demand relatively stable
Differences Between Gain Sharing Plans
and Profit Sharing Plans
Profit sharing
• Rewards workers based
on profits of firm (generally
outside worker control)
• Mechanistic
• Distribution to retirement

Gain sharing
• Rewards workers for their
contributions to firm
• Contingent on employee
suggestions/
improvements
• Self-funded
• Frequent cash distributions
Corporate-Wide Plans Succeed
• Difficult to isolate the financial performance of
any given segment of the corporation
• Highly cyclical ups and downs in the demand
for their product
• Creates common goals and partnership among
managers and workers
Job Dissatisfaction and Stress
Potential Reduction of Intrinsic Drives
Pay for Performance: The Challenges
The “Do Only What You Get Paid For” Syndrome
Negative Effects on the Spirit of Cooperation
Lack of Control
Difficulties in Measuring Performance
Psychological Contracts
The Credibility Gap
The “Do Only What You Get Paid For” Syndrome
The closer pay is tied to particular performance
indicators, the more employees tend to focus on those
indicators and neglect other important job components
Negative Effects on the Spirit of Cooperation
Employees may withhold information from a colleague
if they believe that it will help the other person get
ahead
Lack of Control
Employees often cannot control all of the factors
affecting their performance
Difficulties in Measuring Performance
Assessing employee performance is one of the
thorniest tasks a manager faces, particularly when the
assessments are used to dispense rewards
Psychological Contracts
Once implemented, a pay-for-performance system
creates a psychological contract between the employee
and firm, and it is very resistant to change
The Credibility Gap
Employees often do not believe that pay-forperformance
programs are fair or that they truly reward
performance
Job Dissatisfaction and Stress
Pay-for-performance systems may lead to greater
productivity but lower job satisfaction
Potential Reduction of Intrinsic Drives
Pay-for-performance systems may push employees
to the point of doing whatever it takes to get the
promised monetary reward and in the process stifle
their talents and creativity
Meeting the Challenges of pay and performance
• Link Pay and Performance Appropriately
• Use Pay for Performance as Part of a Broader
HRM System
• Build Employee Trust
• Promote the Belief that Performance Makes a
Difference
• Use Multiple Layers of Rewards
• Increase Employee Involvement
• Use Motivation and Nonfinancial Incentives
Incentive Pay for Executives
Short-Term Incentives
Long-Term Incentives
Short-Term Incentives
• Bonuses based on the
year’s profits, return on
investment, or other
measures related to the
organization’s goals.
• Actual payment of the
bonus may be delayed to
gain tax advantages.
Long-Term Incentives
• Include stock options and
stock purchase plans.
• Rationale for these longterm
incentives is that
executives will want to do
what is best for the
organization because
that will cause the value
of their stock to grow.
Incentive pay for executives lays the groundwork for
______________.
significant ethical issues.

• When an organization links pay to its stock performance,
executives need the courage to be honest about their
company’s performance even when dishonesty or clever
shading of the truth offers the tempting potential for large
earnings.