• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/37

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

37 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

actual productivity

the degree of success of a teams performance at a given time during a game or event

autocratic leader

an authoriatian style of leadership, where the leader makes all the decisions and does not consider opinions of the group

coordination losses

breakdown in team work, ringlemann effect

degree of congruence

the level to which two factor coincide

democratic leader

a leader who shares decision with the group and looks to form meaningful relationships

distraction conflict theory

baron


suggests that pecators have the same demand on a performer as the data form the performers display

emergant leader

a leader appointed from the group formally r informally

evaiulation apprehension

cottrel


suggesting that an audience inhibits performance if the performer perceives that the audience is judging or assessing them

faulty processes

the factors that go wrong in a team

great man thoery

trait theory suggested that sons inherit necessary leadership qualities if their fathers were successful leaders

group cohesion

the level to which a team sticks together and remains united in working for theit common goals

group dynamic s

social processes between group members

home adv effect

a large supportive crowd is thought to benefit the home team

interatice sports

sports where team memeber work together

laissex faire leader

a leader who leaves the gorup to make their own decisions

motivation losses

an individuals decrease motivation during performance causing the to withdraw their efforts


delibrate coasting and social loafing


why?- others not trying


-perceived lack of ability


- ack of reward or incentive


- low self confidence


- coach doesn't value players


- previous negative experience


- injury


- don't know role in team


-poor leadership

multi-dimensional model of leadership

chelladurai


devised the model that measured the effectiveness of a leader based on the degree of success at completing a task and how satisfied the group were during the process


situational (number, time, opposition,activity), leadership(style skills,experience,personality) and member characteristics (age, gender, otivation) behaviour is either required, actual, preferred

potential productivity

the full capabilities of the group when they are working together

prescribed leader

an appointed leader who is selected from outside f the group

proximity effect

schwartz ]relating to the athletes performance to the closeness of the audience the closer the audience the more intense the effect on performance whether it is positive or negative

ringlemann effect

a breakdown in teamwork when the effectiveness of the team to operate as a group cannot be sustained


coordination losses

social cohesion

the formation of relationships within the group

social facilitation

when arousal is stimulated by the presence of an audience hase a postive efffect on performance

social inhibition

when the presents of an audience has a negative effect on performance

social loafing

when a player has decreased motivation, due to feeling their contribution is not being observed, valued or evaluated, causing them to coast through a perid of play or the whole game

steiners model

actual productivity= potential productivity - faulty processes

task cohesion

the way a team works together to complete a task succesfullly

leader Have?

-communiction skills


chriasma


experience


vision


motivates


decision maker


empathy/ understnding

trait theory of leadership?

born not made


great man theory


tough minded


decisive


charisma


blend well with population


_ve


no enviromental factors


no evidence leaders can adapt to all situation

social learning theory

leadership skills are learned


inherited trait/ predispositions

interactionist

common beliefs


situations trigger leadership traits

styles of leadership

task orientated- autocratic , make all the decisions


social orientated- democratic, decision making taking group opinion into account via consultation


laissez-faire - let it be, group independent

group characteristicss

PUPCI


Pattern of communication


Unity


Purpose


Common goal


Identity

team cohesion by?

carren


SILT 4 factors characteristics


SITUATIONAL - opposition, time, enviroment, group size


INDIVIDUAL- characteristics of an individual, motivation and past experience


LEADERSHIP - style


TEAM- goal, communication, experience success/ failure





factors that promote participation

- success


-team building


- peer evaluation


-punishment of non-cohesion and social loafing


- team goals and team players


- plenty of rehearsal and practise


-strong leadership


-postive reniforcement

group cohesion

encourages commitment to exercise


groups adopt similar norms and values and social support


sense of being valued by a group increases motivation

autocaratic vs democratic

-size


- speed of action


- friendly/hostile


- danger


- stage of learning


- personality of leader


-gender