Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
8 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
|
MacLennan v MacLennan 1958
|
Artificial insemination in US not adultery. Requires physical contact with an alien and unlawful sex organ.
|
Adultery
|
|
|
Hunter v Hunter 1900
|
Thought husband was dead so had new husband. Adultery even though lacked mens rea.
|
Adultery
|
|
|
Hunter v Hunter 1883
|
Told in argument to go back to old ways (prostitution). Defence failed as said in anger.
|
Lenocinium
|
|
|
Thomson v Thomson 1908
|
Husband gave wife money for innocent day trip, although he knew she was meeting her lover and wanted grounds for divorce. Defence failed because there was no collusion.
|
Lenocinium
|
|
|
Gallacher v Gallacher 1928
|
Wrote letter to estranged wife asking for grounds for divorce so she started a new relationship. Successful as acting on encouragement. Failed 6 years as she had chosem to continue relationship.
|
Lenocinium
|
|
|
White v White 1966
|
Husband caught having homosexual sex in train station toilets. Sufficient for behaviour grounds as defender had been cruel although not directed at the purusuer.
|
Behaviour
|
|
|
Findlay v Findlay 1991
|
Late hours not sufficient to claim on behaviour. But when purusuer started associations with another man, unreasonable to expect her to return.
|
Behaviour
|
|
|
Hastie v Hastie 1985
|
Allegation husband has committed incest with daughter. Made up allegations and could not expect husband to continue to live with hed.
|
Behaviour
|
