Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
70 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
implied powers
|
-derived from necessary and proper clause (Article I, Section 8)
|
|
necessary and proper clause
|
article I Section 8
provides Congress with authority to make all laws necessary and proper |
|
reserved powers
|
10th amendment
powers that are reserved for states (coercion, power to define private property) |
|
full faith and credit clause
|
Article IV, Section 1
requires that states honor public acts and judicial decisions that take place in another state |
|
Defense of Marriage Act in 1996
|
state do not have to recognize same-sex marriage even if it legal in another state
|
|
privileges and immunities
|
Article IV, Section 2
state cannot discriminate against someone from another state or give its own residents special privileges "comity clause" |
|
Interstate Compact Clause
|
Article I, Section 10
authorizes states to negotiate agreements; Port Authority of NY and NJ |
|
Interstate Rendition Clause
|
governments of states forced to extradite criminals
|
|
home rule
|
power delegated by the state to a local unit of government to manage its own affairs
|
|
dual federalism
|
system of govt that prevailed from 1789-1937, in which most fundamental governmental powers were shared between the federal and state govts
|
|
commerce clause
|
Article I, Section 8
gives Congress the power "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with indian tribes." interpreted by SC to favor national power over the economy |
|
McCulloch v. Maryland
|
-favored national power
-Congress had power to charter bank -necessary and proper clause -1819 |
|
Gibbons v. Ogden
|
-favored national
-steamboat monopoly -power to regulate interstate commerce given to Congress -1824 |
|
cooperative federalism
|
existing since the New Deal in which grants-in-aid used strategically to encourage states (without commanding) to pursue nationally defined goals.
|
|
grants-in-aid
|
-general term for funds given by congress to state govts
-form of federal influence |
|
categorical grants-in-aid
|
-earmarked by law for specific categories
-project grants:states/local submit proposals -formula grants |
|
regulated federalism
|
-from 1960s
-natl govt actually regulates states by threatening to withhold grant money unless state/l govts conform to natl standards |
|
unfunded mandates
|
-standards/programs imposed withouth funding
-Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)-stop, look and listen |
|
block grants
|
-Reagan
-funds given with relatively few restrictions on how they may be spent |
|
devolution
|
delegating to the states more and more authority
|
|
state sovereign immunity
|
legal doctrine holding that states cannot be sued for violating an act of Congress
-11th amendment |
|
U.S. v. Lopez
|
-1995
-fueled interest in 10th amendment -Court stated Congress had exceeded its authority under commerce clause -struck down federal law that barred handguns near schools |
|
states rights
|
-Printz v. US
-City of Boerne v. Flores -U.S. v. Lopez -US v. Morrison -Gonzales v. Oregon |
|
Gramm Rudman Act of 1986
|
-struck down
-mandated balanced budget |
|
US v. Nixon
|
Pentagon papers
|
|
state sovereign immunity
|
legal doctrine holding that states cannot be sued for violating an act of Congress
-11th amendment |
|
U.S. v. Lopez
|
-1995
-fueled interest in 10th amendment -Court stated Congress had exceeded its authority under commerce clause -struck down federal law that barred handguns near schools |
|
states rights
|
-Printz v. US
-City of Boerne v. Flores -U.S. v. Lopez -US v. Morrison -Gonzales v. Oregon |
|
Gramm Rudman Act of 1986
|
-struck down
-mandated balanced budget |
|
US v. Nixon
|
Pentagon papers
-since New Deal, SC far more deferential except for 5 confrontations |
|
executive privilege
|
confidential communication between president and president's close advisers should not be revealed without consent of president
|
|
writ of habeas corpus
|
court order demanding that individual in custody be brought into court and shown cause for detention. guaranteed and can be suspended only in cases of rebellion or invasion
|
|
civil liberties
|
-protections of citizens from improper governmental action
-Bill of Rights |
|
civil rights
|
-legal or moral claims that citizens are entitled to make on the govt
-14th amendment |
|
Barron v. Baltimore
|
-1833
-city of Baltimore put gravel in Barron's wharf and destroyed it -grounds: under 5th amendment, Baltimore uncostitutionally deprived him of property -lost; confirmed "dual citizenship" -dual citizenship meant that Bill of Rights did not apply to decisions or procedures of state govts |
|
Slaughter house cases
|
1873
-federal govt under no obligation to protect "privileges and immunities" of citizens against arbitrary actions by state govt |
|
eminent domain
|
power of public agencies to seize private property
|
|
Gideon v. Wainwright
|
right to counsel in criminal trial
-expanded 14th amendment |
|
Mapp v. Ohio
|
"exclusionary rule"
-expanded 14th amendment |
|
Miranda Rule
|
convention derived from the 1966
-expanded 14th amendment |
|
Benton v. Maryland
|
double jeopardy
-expanded 14th amendment |
|
establishment clause
|
first amendment
-says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." -wall of separation between church and state |
|
Lemon v. Kurtzman
|
-Lemon test
-criteria for government aid to religious schools |
|
free exercise clause
|
first amendment
-protects a citizen's right to believe and practice whatever religion they choose -West Virginia State Board of Ed v. Barnette:Jehovah witnesses |
|
strict scrutiny
|
-criteria used by SC in racial discrimination cases and other cases involving civil liberties/rights. Strict scrutiny places burden of proof on govt.
|
|
clear and present danger
|
criterion used to determine whether speech is protected or unprotected, based on its capacity to present a "clear and present danger" to society
|
|
speech plus
|
speech accompanied by activities such as demonstrations
-protection is conditional -restrictions imposed by state/l govts acceptable is properly balanced by considerations of public order |
|
prior restraint
|
effort by govt agncy to block the publication of material it deems libelous or harmful in some other way; censorship.
-courst forbid it except under the most extraordinary circumstances -Near v. Minnesot |
|
Near v. Minnesota
|
1931
-freedom of press from prior restraint |
|
NY times v. US
|
-Pentagon papers
- |
|
libel/slander
|
libel is written. slander is oral
-statement made in "reckless disregard of the truth" and considered damaging to a victim because it is "malicious, scandalous, and defamatory." |
|
Ny Times v. Sullivan
|
newspaper had to deliberately print false and malicious material
|
|
exclusionary rule
|
ability of courts to exclusde evidence obtained in violation of 4th amendment
-Mapp v. Ohio |
|
Bowers v. Hardwick
|
-roommate let police in
-arrested for sodomy -SC ruled against Hardwick |
|
Lawrence v. Texas
|
state legislatures no longer had authority to make private sexual behavior a crime
|
|
1st Amendment
|
-Political speech
-Symbolic speech, speech plus, rights of assembly and petition -freedom of press -commercial speech |
|
2nd amendment
|
right to bear arms
|
|
4th amendment
|
searches and seizure
|
|
5th amendment
|
-due process
-grand juries -double jeopardy -self incrimination -eminent domain |
|
6th amendment
|
right to cousel
right to a speedy trial right to confront witnesses before impartial jury |
|
8th amendment
|
-excessive bail
-excessive fines -cruel and unusual punishment |
|
equal protection clause
|
-14th amendment
-guarantess citizens "the equal protection of the laws." -basis for the civil rights |
|
Civil Rights Act of 1875
|
Court declared it unconstitutional on the grounds that it sought to protect blacks from discrimination by private businesses
|
|
de jure segregation
|
racial segregation that is a direct result of law of official policy
|
|
de facto segregation
|
racial segregation that is not a direct result of law or govt policy, but is a reflection of residential patters, income distributions or other social factors
|
|
intermediate scrutiny
|
test used by SC in gender discrimination cases
-places burden partially on gov and partially on challenger |
|
Violence against Women Act
|
defined gender biased violent crimes as a matter of civil rights and created a civil rights remedy for women who have been the victims of such crimes
|
|
US v. Wong Kim Ark
|
anyone born in US entitled to full citizenship
|
|
Adarand Constuctors v. Pena
|
race based policies must survive strict scrutiny, placing the burden on the govt to show that such affirmative action programs serve a compelling govt interest
|
|
Bakke v. UC regents
|
Court permitted universities to take minority status into consideration but limited use of quotas
|