• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/70

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

70 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
implied powers
-derived from necessary and proper clause (Article I, Section 8)
necessary and proper clause
article I Section 8
provides Congress with authority to make all laws necessary and proper
reserved powers
10th amendment
powers that are reserved for states (coercion, power to define private property)
full faith and credit clause
Article IV, Section 1
requires that states honor public acts and judicial decisions that take place in another state
Defense of Marriage Act in 1996
state do not have to recognize same-sex marriage even if it legal in another state
privileges and immunities
Article IV, Section 2
state cannot discriminate against someone from another state or give its own residents special privileges
"comity clause"
Interstate Compact Clause
Article I, Section 10
authorizes states to negotiate agreements; Port Authority of NY and NJ
Interstate Rendition Clause
governments of states forced to extradite criminals
home rule
power delegated by the state to a local unit of government to manage its own affairs
dual federalism
system of govt that prevailed from 1789-1937, in which most fundamental governmental powers were shared between the federal and state govts
commerce clause
Article I, Section 8
gives Congress the power "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with indian tribes."
interpreted by SC to favor national power over the economy
McCulloch v. Maryland
-favored national power
-Congress had power to charter bank
-necessary and proper clause
-1819
Gibbons v. Ogden
-favored national
-steamboat monopoly
-power to regulate interstate commerce given to Congress
-1824
cooperative federalism
existing since the New Deal in which grants-in-aid used strategically to encourage states (without commanding) to pursue nationally defined goals.
grants-in-aid
-general term for funds given by congress to state govts
-form of federal influence
categorical grants-in-aid
-earmarked by law for specific categories
-project grants:states/local submit proposals
-formula grants
regulated federalism
-from 1960s
-natl govt actually regulates states by threatening to withhold grant money unless state/l govts conform to natl standards
unfunded mandates
-standards/programs imposed withouth funding
-Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)-stop, look and listen
block grants
-Reagan
-funds given with relatively few restrictions on how they may be spent
devolution
delegating to the states more and more authority
state sovereign immunity
legal doctrine holding that states cannot be sued for violating an act of Congress
-11th amendment
U.S. v. Lopez
-1995
-fueled interest in 10th amendment
-Court stated Congress had exceeded its authority under commerce clause
-struck down federal law that barred handguns near schools
states rights
-Printz v. US
-City of Boerne v. Flores
-U.S. v. Lopez
-US v. Morrison
-Gonzales v. Oregon
Gramm Rudman Act of 1986
-struck down
-mandated balanced budget
US v. Nixon
Pentagon papers
state sovereign immunity
legal doctrine holding that states cannot be sued for violating an act of Congress
-11th amendment
U.S. v. Lopez
-1995
-fueled interest in 10th amendment
-Court stated Congress had exceeded its authority under commerce clause
-struck down federal law that barred handguns near schools
states rights
-Printz v. US
-City of Boerne v. Flores
-U.S. v. Lopez
-US v. Morrison
-Gonzales v. Oregon
Gramm Rudman Act of 1986
-struck down
-mandated balanced budget
US v. Nixon
Pentagon papers
-since New Deal, SC far more deferential except for 5 confrontations
executive privilege
confidential communication between president and president's close advisers should not be revealed without consent of president
writ of habeas corpus
court order demanding that individual in custody be brought into court and shown cause for detention. guaranteed and can be suspended only in cases of rebellion or invasion
civil liberties
-protections of citizens from improper governmental action
-Bill of Rights
civil rights
-legal or moral claims that citizens are entitled to make on the govt
-14th amendment
Barron v. Baltimore
-1833
-city of Baltimore put gravel in Barron's wharf and destroyed it
-grounds: under 5th amendment, Baltimore uncostitutionally deprived him of property
-lost; confirmed "dual citizenship"
-dual citizenship meant that Bill of Rights did not apply to decisions or procedures of state govts
Slaughter house cases
1873
-federal govt under no obligation to protect "privileges and immunities" of citizens against arbitrary actions by state govt
eminent domain
power of public agencies to seize private property
Gideon v. Wainwright
right to counsel in criminal trial
-expanded 14th amendment
Mapp v. Ohio
"exclusionary rule"
-expanded 14th amendment
Miranda Rule
convention derived from the 1966
-expanded 14th amendment
Benton v. Maryland
double jeopardy
-expanded 14th amendment
establishment clause
first amendment
-says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
-wall of separation between church and state
Lemon v. Kurtzman
-Lemon test
-criteria for government aid to religious schools
free exercise clause
first amendment
-protects a citizen's right to believe and practice whatever religion they choose
-West Virginia State Board of Ed v. Barnette:Jehovah witnesses
strict scrutiny
-criteria used by SC in racial discrimination cases and other cases involving civil liberties/rights. Strict scrutiny places burden of proof on govt.
clear and present danger
criterion used to determine whether speech is protected or unprotected, based on its capacity to present a "clear and present danger" to society
speech plus
speech accompanied by activities such as demonstrations
-protection is conditional
-restrictions imposed by state/l govts acceptable is properly balanced by considerations of public order
prior restraint
effort by govt agncy to block the publication of material it deems libelous or harmful in some other way; censorship.
-courst forbid it except under the most extraordinary circumstances
-Near v. Minnesot
Near v. Minnesota
1931
-freedom of press from prior restraint
NY times v. US
-Pentagon papers
-
libel/slander
libel is written. slander is oral
-statement made in "reckless disregard of the truth" and considered damaging to a victim because it is "malicious, scandalous, and defamatory."
Ny Times v. Sullivan
newspaper had to deliberately print false and malicious material
exclusionary rule
ability of courts to exclusde evidence obtained in violation of 4th amendment
-Mapp v. Ohio
Bowers v. Hardwick
-roommate let police in
-arrested for sodomy
-SC ruled against Hardwick
Lawrence v. Texas
state legislatures no longer had authority to make private sexual behavior a crime
1st Amendment
-Political speech
-Symbolic speech, speech plus, rights of assembly and petition
-freedom of press
-commercial speech
2nd amendment
right to bear arms
4th amendment
searches and seizure
5th amendment
-due process
-grand juries
-double jeopardy
-self incrimination
-eminent domain
6th amendment
right to cousel
right to a speedy trial
right to confront witnesses before impartial jury
8th amendment
-excessive bail
-excessive fines
-cruel and unusual punishment
equal protection clause
-14th amendment
-guarantess citizens "the equal protection of the laws."
-basis for the civil rights
Civil Rights Act of 1875
Court declared it unconstitutional on the grounds that it sought to protect blacks from discrimination by private businesses
de jure segregation
racial segregation that is a direct result of law of official policy
de facto segregation
racial segregation that is not a direct result of law or govt policy, but is a reflection of residential patters, income distributions or other social factors
intermediate scrutiny
test used by SC in gender discrimination cases
-places burden partially on gov and partially on challenger
Violence against Women Act
defined gender biased violent crimes as a matter of civil rights and created a civil rights remedy for women who have been the victims of such crimes
US v. Wong Kim Ark
anyone born in US entitled to full citizenship
Adarand Constuctors v. Pena
race based policies must survive strict scrutiny, placing the burden on the govt to show that such affirmative action programs serve a compelling govt interest
Bakke v. UC regents
Court permitted universities to take minority status into consideration but limited use of quotas