• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

marbury vs madison

supreme court to strike down laws of congress that it determined are unconstitutional

Dred Scott vs. sanford

-could not prevent slavery in the territories


-citizens=whites only

baker vs carr

-voided tennessee's congressional district reapportionment plan because it did not take in to account pop growth


-one man one vote (states must not dilute votes of individuals when redrawing congressional district boundaries


*congressional districts must contain about same people

lemon vs kurtzman

-when states violate religion


1. statue must have a secular legislative process


2.the statue's primary effect may not advance nor inhibit religion


3. statue must not foster "an excessive government" entanglement with religion

new york times vs. sullivan

-rights of citizens to publicly criticize public officials without fear of being sued for libel


griswold vs connecticut

american rights are not limited specifically to those in the constitution

buckley vs valeo

-struck down campaign spending limits contained in the federal election campaign act


-federal campaign act violated 1st amendment freedom of speech

citizens united vs. federal elections commission

corporations have 1st amendment rights to spend unlimited amounts on political campaigns

gitlow vs new york

states can't interfere with citizens 1st amendment rights (unless speech expressively advocates the overthrow of the government

roth vs the united states

-works of art were obscene if it appealed to prurient interests

plessy vs. ferguson

separate but equal

brown vs. board of education

overturned plessy vs. ferguson

bush vs gore

-recounting violated the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment

bakke vs regents of university of california

universities can't deny applicants solely because of their race

grutter vs. bollinger

michigans law school Affirmative action program was constitutional because it was narrowly tailored to promote diverse student body

roe vs wade

right to privacy= women's legal right to aborotions

mapp vs. ohio

protects citizens 14th amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures

miranda vs arizona

before being arrested citizen must be reminded of their right to remain silent


-anything they say can be used against them in a court of law


-have right to have a lawyer present