• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/25

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

25 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

BROADLY SPEAKING WHAT IS A GIFT?

The immediate transfer of property rights from the donor (person making the gift) ---- to the donee (person receiving the gift) w/out any payment or other consideration.

IS A PROMISE TO MAKE A GIFT IN THE FUTURE ENFORCEABLE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION?

NO - Because no consideration is paid; no


contract arises between the parties – therefore, a promise to make a gift in the future is unenforceable w/o some form of consideration.

WHAT ARE THE THREE TYPES OF GIFTS?

1. Inter Vivos Gifts




2. Testamentary Gift Transfers




3. Gift Causa Mortis

WHAT IS AN INTER VIVOS GIFT (Latin for “between living people”)?

An Inter Vivos Gift is an ordinary gift of personal property that one living person makes to another, like a gift at a birthday party.




It is effective immediately and irrevocable.

WHAT ARE THE THREE ELEMENTS OF AN INTER VIVOS GIFT?

1. Donative Intent




2. Delivery




3. Acceptance.

EXPLAIN DONATIVE INTENT.

The donor must have a present mental capacity and must intend to make an effective gift of her property; and intend to make an immediate transfer of property.





HOW IS DONATIVE INTENT APPLIED TO TITLE?

Donative Intent applied to title:




The donor may intend to immediately vest title in the donee, and reserve a right of possession until some future date.

EXPLAIN THE DELIVERY ELEMENT?

The property must be delivered to the donee, so that the donor (owner) parts w/dominion and control





WHAT ARE THE THREE TYPES OF DELIVERY?

1. Manual Delivery




2. Constructive Delivery




3. Symbolic Delivery

WHAT IS MANUAL DELIVERY?

Manual delivery occurs when donor physically transfers possession of the item to the donee




Traditionally, manual delivery of a gift is required if practicable.




EXAMPLE: A manually delivers a pen to B by handing him the pen

WHAT IS CONSTRUCTIVE DELIVERY?

An act that amounts to a transfer of title by operation of law when actual transfer is impractical or impossible.




EXAMPLE: the delivery of a key to a desk (with intent to give) amounts to constructive delivery of the contents of the desk

WHAT IS SYMBOLIC DELIVERY?




NOTES: NC doesn't recognize this; and in many jurisdictions, symbolic delivery is allowed only if manual delivery is impracticable or impossible.





The donor physically transfers to the donee an object that represents or symbolizes the gifted item, like the letters in Gruen.




EXAMPLE: A note from E stating “I give my 100 shares of Apple, Inc. to F” may be enough to


deliver the shares to F.





WHAT IS ACCEPTANCE?

The donee must accept property; although acceptance of a valuable item is usually presumed




(Sometimes acceptance is disputed)

WHAT ARE TESTAMENTARY GIFTS?

Individuals transfer their property when they die through a valid will or inheritance.




NOTE: This type of gift only valid if it satisfies the Statute of Wills, which requires a writing signed by the donor and witnessed by 2 ore more people.

WHAT IS A GIFT CAUSA MORTIS?

A gift of personal property made by a living person in contemplation of (imminent) death.



IS A GIFT CAUSA MORTIS REVOCABLE?

Yes. Donor make revoke at any time before her death.




In most states, the gift is revoked automatically if donor does not die from anticipated peril

HOW IS A GIFT CAUSA MORTIS VALIDATED?

To validate a gift causa mortis, a donor must die as anticipated; and you MUST die from the


anticipated illness/peril

WHAT ARE THE FOUR ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS FOR A GIFT CAUSA MORTIS?

(i) Donative intent; (ii) Delivery; (iii) Acceptance; and (iv) The Donor’s anticipation of imminent death

EXPLAIN ELEMENT IV - DONOR'S ANTICIPATION OF IMMINENT DEATH.

Imminence: Donor must be suffering from an actual illness that threatened her life. The mere abstract fear of death from a future cause (e.g., fear of flying, fear of death in war, etc.) is not sufficient. (CONT. ON NEXT CARD)

DONOR'S ANTICIPATION OF IMMINENT DEATH CONT.

Death as Anticipated: To validate a gift causa mortis, a donor must die as anticipated. However, considerable liberality has been given to this concept in more recent decisions.

EXAMPLE OF DEATH AS ANTICIPATED.

Example: A victim of an auto accident is placed in an ambulance. In fear of death from the injuries sustained in the accident, she attempts to make a gift causa mortis. En route to the hospital the ambulance is struck by a train and the donor is killed. Can it be said that the donor died “as anticipated”? The more modern authorities would say YES.

GENERAL RULE FOR RECOVERY OF A GIFT CAUSA MORTIS ?

Recovery - General Rule: One who attempts a gift causa mortis in contemplation of death will have made a valid gift as long as she fails to recover, though the precise cause of death is different (See Brind v. International Trust Co.)

GIFT CAUSA MORTIS CASE:


BRIND v. INTERNATIONAL TRUST CO.

Donor died of causes other than original expectation.




Was it a gift in anticipation of death OR in anticipation of a particular cause of death? (Prof Mac – it’s the death not the cause that determines if the gift is effective)



BRIND v. INTERNATIONAL TRUST CO. (CONT)


WHAT IS THE MAJORITY RULE?

Death must result from anticipated peril:




(i) Majority Rule (Inflexible): Must die exactly from the actual anticipated peril in order for a gift causa mortis to be valid.





BRIND v. INTERNATIONAL TRUST CO. (CONT)WHAT IS THE MINORITY RULE?

(ii) Minority Rule (Flexible): As long as you die while you are still recovering – Prof. Mac




Court generally disfavors GCM's: main concern is potential for fraud ------> Courts see it as an attempt to get around statute of wills