• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/7

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
General Intent Crime
can be committed either with the specific intent OR recklessness as mens rea.
-Murder 2
-Murder 1
-Arson
Specific Intent Crime
Can only be committed with the specific intent to commit the crime as a mens rea

-burglary
-larceny
-felony murder
Voluntary Intoxication
cannot be used as a defense to general intent crimes.
-rarely given as a defense
-intent must be formed after intoxication
Justifiable Homicie
a homicide where D's intent to kill is lawful
-self defense (take the life of his attacker becuase he was suffering a deadly attack
-crime prevention (clerk shoots robber)
-crime apprehension
imperfect self defnese
D takes action in response to an honest (subjective) and reasonable (objective) belief of imminent deadly attack using force that she honestly (subjective) and reasonably (objectively) believes is necessary and proportional.

-voluntary manslaughter by imperfect self defense
-d has a "fractured" beleif ie honest but unreasonable belief of imminent deadly attack or proportional force
-use facts to show imminence and proportion
(victims prior history, circumstances of the case, relative size of both parties)

imminence in battered woman cases
(since imminence is an objective standard what about women who are beaten daily and murder their abusive husbands while they sleep?
Involuntary Manslaughter
An unintentional homicide committed without malice but with gross negligence

Gross Negligence: defendant knew or should have appreciated substantial and unjustifiable risk of death or serious harm.
unjustifiable: nature/purpose does it outweight
substantial: likelihood plus magnitutde

defendant needs to have known or should have known risk
-reasonable person test
-easier to satisfy than the purely subjective test of VM
-conduct that is substantial and unjustifiable risk to human life.

ex. speeding through the streets to get to the hospital v. speeding through the streets to catch a movie on time

case. hall

defendant skiing down the mountain.
Attempt
Actus Reus: sufficient acts toward commission of the crime (acts provide evidence of intent.
Mens rea: 1) desire to cause consequences of death
2) even if actor doesnt intend, it is practically certain crime will result.