• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/13

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

13 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Direct Intent

Aim / Desire / Purpose


R v Maloney

Indirect / oblique intent

R v Woollin:


A) was the outcome “virtually certain” as a result of D’s acts?


B) if so, was D aware of this virtual certainty?

Recklessness

R v Cunningham; R v G


A) At the time D committed the AR, D was subjectively aware of the risk.


B) in the circumstances known to D it was objectively unreasonable for D to take the risk. A risk is objectively unreasonable if there is little or no social utility or benefit in taking it.

Burden of Proof

On the prosecution to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.


Wilmington v DPP

Transferred Malice

If D hit V by accident and wanted to hit A, then MR gets transferred.


R v Latimer


But AR & MR must be for same offence.


R v Pembliton

Coincidence of AR & MR

When D has the AR then D must have at the same point MR for the relevant offence.


When AR is a continuing act, then sufficient for MR at any point during continuance (Fagan v MPC)


When AR is a series of acts that make up one transaction then MR at some point.


R v Le Brun : D assault V, then while moving she hits her head and dies.


R v Thabo-Meli : D thought he killed V, but throws off a cliff, then V dies.

Mistake

Mistake as an element of AR may negate MR.


Ignorance of the criminal law is never an excuse, but making a mistake in civil law be. R v Smith

Omissions

There is no duty to prevent harm (R v Smith).

Omissions: Statutory Duty

Duty to act or a duty on a public office holder.

Omissions: Contractual Duty

Duty to act, like gatekeeper overseeing a railway-crossing


R v Pittwood

Omissions: Special Relationship

Such as voluntarily assuming the care of a vulnerable family member.


R v Stone & Dobinson


Parent; husband/wife; Doctor (bland);

Omissions: assuming duty to care

Ruffell - administrating first aid or attempting to will create a special relationship

Omissions: creating a dangerous situation

R v Miller


If D inadvertently sets in motion a chain of events that creates risk of damage, D becomes aware of what is happening and can prevent it, but decides not to, D’s inaction can be the AR of criminal damage.