Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
3 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
- Sjoberg argues study of foundational assumptions of immunity principle to understand problems of modern civ protection - Chali carpenter exp gender essentialism in int advocacy - Women and children are proxied as civvies, worries that this distortion may affect civ protection |
- contends that carpenter has missed gendering immunity principle - Women and children doesnt protect women and neglect men, stereotypes women as helpless and perpetuates gender sub effects of war - feminists see war victimize women, renders the immunity principle ineffective for men, women, children |
|
|
- war touts immunity principle, most evidence shows it to be ineffective - not due to lack of salience why it fails, meant to mitigate brutality of war improve chances of peaceful resolution, one of major diff is distinction bet guilty of enemy offense and innocent |
- combatants defined by appearance, situation, motivation, not objective or anything easy to understand - immunity principle cant distinguish non combatants - Principle of double effect, combo with civ casualties show another problem |
|
|
- the term immunity is impossible, people in a warzone will feel the soical, poli, econ and collateral effects - |
- |
