• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/7

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What is the aim of fordwilgner
To find out if clinicians were stereotyping genders when diagnosising disorders.

What was the research method of fordwilgner and how was the data gathered?

Self experiment field expeirment. Psych given senario then asked diagnosis out of 9 possible choices, and bipolar ratings. IV is gender. DV diagnosis. Male, female or unknown conditions. They were given one of 9 (ASPD OR HPD).

Describe the sample of fordwilgner?

266 psych out of 1000. Mean age 47/exp 15.

What were the findings of fordwilgner?
No gender found BORDERLINE PD. When MALE - ASPD 42% CORRECT - HPD 15% - When FEMALE then HPD 54% CORRECT AND ASPD 15%
What was the conclusion of fordwilgner?
Found a clear bias when diagnosising. FEMALES CLEAR HPD AND MALES ASPD.
Is it reliable of fordwilgnerl?
IV was isolated, case studies could be standardised and eaily replicable. Quantative data collected.
Is it valid of fordwilgner?
Reductionisst in a way. Case studies could not be representative. Low ecological validity.