Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
20 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)
|
Barred Bible reading and the Lord's Prayer.
|
|
Stone v. Graham (1980)
|
Barred posting of Ten Commandments.
|
|
Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)
|
Banned silent meditation.
|
|
Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)
|
Prevented government from deciding what was a religion.
|
|
Bunn v. North Carolina (1949)
|
Prohibits poisonous reptiles in religious ceremonies.
|
|
Welsh v. United States (1970)
|
Expands beliefs that can be used to obtain conscientious objector status.
|
|
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
|
Amish children cannot be forced under compulsory education past the 8th grade.
|
|
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
|
Court protected flag burning.
|
|
Yates v. United States (1957)
|
Speech is protected unless it violates the "clear and present danger rule."
|
|
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
|
Government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless it is likely to incite lawless action.
|
|
Near v. Minnesota
|
Rejects prior restraints on publication.
|
|
Branzburg v. Hayes
|
First Amendment cannot be used as a defense for reporters summoned to testify.
|
|
Miller v. California
|
Defines what constitutes unprotected obscenity for First Amendment purposes and reiterates that obscenity is not protected.
|
|
Reno v. ACLU (1997)
|
Supreme Court held that Internet speech entitled to the fullest First Amendment protections.
|
|
Adderley v. Florida (1966)
|
States may protect their property and withhold its use from demonstrators for nondiscriminatory reasons.
|
|
Grayned v. City of Rockford (1972)
|
Antipicketing laws are unconstitutional but upholds antinoise laws.
|
|
Lloyd Corporation v. Tanner (1972)
|
Protects private property from being used for protest.
|
|
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York (1997)
|
Supreme Court upholds fixed buffer zones around abortion clinics to protect patients.
|
|
NAACP v. Alabama
|
Barred states from scrutinizing petitioner membership lists.
|
|
Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte (1987)
|
Justice Powell argued that women may join the club because it does not prevent the club from carrying out its purposes.
|